Joined: Nov 10, 2013 Posts: 17750 Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Cucho, it's an excellent question. At home, there's no issue of course. But in a bathroom stall, you gotta pick up your phone and put it in your pocket before you walk over to the sink. See? Big problem. Also while you're wiping said ass, where does the phone go? I can't have it in my pocket then cuz the pants are on the ground, right? And not all stalls have a spot for you to put the phone on a ledge, so the only spot (my Toronto office is like this) is the FLOOR of the stall which 100% has fecal matter. So i put the phone standing up to minimize the risk and surface area touching the floor.
Hey, sorry to tangent but Timh’s opening there reminds me of something I recently realized but that no one talks about :
As Timh has pointed out, most of us are on our phones on the toilet during poop and poop-adjacent activities. Most people wash their hands after.
Those phones aren’t getting cleaned at all. The phone is touched non stop during and after poop and poop-adjacent activities.
And then in a restaurant when a person comes back to the table, where does the phone go? BACK ON THE TABLE. Right on the linen, beside utensils and food
There has GOT to be some fecal matter on the phone no?
And this is PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE in society. No one bats an eye.
There is poop on the dining table.
I agree.
However; there is poop all over the restaraunts. That slice of fruit in your drink? Studies show 90% of fruit garnish have fecal matter on them. Your salad has fecal matter in it too. It comes from the fields. The workers don't get paid breaks, are paid by the bushel, and are often clear on the other side of the field as the portapotty. If they gotta go they just cop-a-squat. When they're done they keep picking fruit. That's what the study I read said.
Also, assuming my hands are cleanish going in, and I put the phone back in my pocket before wiping my ass, there really shouldn't be any fecal matter transfer from my hands to the phone.
Joined: Nov 10, 2013 Posts: 17750 Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Right so you gotta wash all produce really thoroughly, I knew that. And the few restaurants I worked at, we had these great power hoses that would rinse stuff
Different topic that bugged me enough to type it out. I've jsut finished up book one called The Last World War of two books by Timothy Imholt and Michael Garst. The only problems I had with the book was you could clearly tell that the writers did very little to no research and one phrase that just annoyed me ( "our stealthiest bombers").
So in the book the US is attacked with two nuclear weapons from Iran, that's fine with me the targets were a Lockheed-Martin factory in Texas and another donated in Detroit. Apparently there are no other factories/companies that could supply the US military.
Then the writers for whatever reason choose to go with the Green Berets instead of either the Navy Seals or Delta despite those two groups being better for the actual missions depicted in the book.
Going back to the nuclear weapons, they did no research on how long the fallout would last or anything related to it beyond radiation burns/sickness and the damage caused. They decided that an indefinite 15 mile quarantine zone would have to be put in place around the bomb zones.
Then during a combat sequence they had US pilots getting into close combat with the Iranian air force and losing because I guess we didn't train them and our aircraft suck? Then they ordered the pilots not to get into close combat and they start winning again lol. This is also putting aside that Iran also used nuclear weapons to take out three military targets in Israel including their nuclear weapons because they had them all in one place for some dumb reason. Then for some reason both Egypt and Syria with Iran going through Iraq (with no issues somehow) decided to invade Israel.
If it weren't for the fact that book was readable via kindle unlimited I would have been upset over paying for it. With all the above said, the editing/proof reading were good no errors in that department. And now to copy and past all that into the review.
_________________
"angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly connection to the starry dynamo in the machinery of night," -GINSBERG
Joined: Nov 03, 2013 Posts: 7271 Location: Your Head
Identity: Im not a cat
In Civ 7 leaders will be unconnected to countries so you could be Queen Victoria of the Shawnee for example. This also allows them to use "leaders" that never really led a country like Machiavelli for example. I think this is awesome. In single player, where i play, I see no downside to this. In multi player I could see some issues arising with specific meta choices.
Yo Barno, can you share some bullet points on what could happen economy wise with Trump? I'm reading sime tweets about tarifs and sounds like Brexit all over again.
Joined: Nov 10, 2013 Posts: 17750 Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Sure thing Cucho. First of all, here's a quote from J.P. Morgan that really helps:
Quote:
"Presidential policy does not exist in a vacuum. There are a lot of other things going on in the world that will influence the direction of markets." - Jack Manley - J.P. Morgan Asset Management
We published a piece yesterday called What the Election Outcomes means for your Portfolio. I'll post some snippets from it that I think are relevant and interesting for most. And i'll bold some of the key stuff that I think will be of interest too.
Spoiler
With Republicans likely taking control of the Senate as well, the odds of a Republican-controlled federal government in 2025 are rapidly being priced into the markets. This prospect is expected to usher in an era of more inflationary policies due to factors like tax cuts, increased fiscal spending, pressure on the Federal Reserve, and new trade restrictions.
Initial Market Reactions
• Equities surged, particularly in small-cap and cyclical sectors are expected to benefit from the anticipated domestic economic boost • Government bond yields sold off aggressively, especially on the long end, as higher inflation and borrowing needs could create a supply/demand imbalance • Bitcoin reached new highs on expectations of a more favourable regulatory environment to cryptocurrencies under the Trump administration • Renewable energy stocks fell while Fintech surged on the expected policy shifts • Homebuilder stocks sold off as hopes for mortgage relief faded
• The U.S. dollar strengthened on the back of divergence in global monetary policy and economic growth rates • The Mexican Peso fell to 2-year lows on fears of new tariffs and trade restrictions
Equity Team
Overall, the 2024 election results point to a continuation of the populist, America-first policies of the previous Trump administration, with potentially significant implications for the economy, markets, and U.S. global standing.
While a "Red Sweep" of Republican control across the federal government could initially benefit small-caps and certain sectors expected to benefit from lower corporate tax rates like financials and industrials, there are still important differences from the 2016 environment that temper the outlook.
Unlike 2016, when the economy was still recovering from a deep contraction, today's later-cycle backdrop is characterized by high inflation rather than deflation. Bond markets may not embrace further deficit expansion under a Trump presidency in the same way they did previously. This could pose risks to cyclical equities that have priced in additional rate cuts.
Additionally, the ability of multinational corporations to repatriate overseas cash—a major boon in 2016—is less of a factor this time around. The ramifications of potential corporate tax cuts to 15% may also be more muted for domestic-focused American companies compared to their multinational counterparts.
Overall, while a unified Republican government could drive certain near-term market rotations, the longer-term implications are more complex given the different economic backdrop compared to 2016. We would caution investors about automatically extrapolating the prior playbook into the current environment.
Fixed Income Team
This clear-cut outcome removed fears of contested or delayed results, driving rates higher and fueling equity market gains as results emerged overnight. . Overnight, U.S. rates sold off sharply, with the yield curve bear-steepening amid inflationary concerns related to tariffs and increased deficits under Trump's economic plan.
Risk assets, including credit and equities, rallied on expectations of deregulation and accelerated growth. U.S. equities surged by 3–5% on the result day, while investment- grade credit spreads tightened by 5–7 basis points, pushing spreads back toward historical tights. Canadian interest rates, meanwhile, outperformed U.S. interest rates on expectations of diverging policy paths between the Bank of Canada and the Fed, given concerns that U.S. protectionist trade policies might negatively impact Canadian economic growth.
Arbitrage Team
The Arbitrage Funds are expected to benefit significantly from the new Trump administration. Antitrust regulation under Biden, headed by Lina Khan at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Jonathan Kanter at the Department of Justice (DOJ), has been biggest challenge in decades to the merger arbitrage strategy. These two regulators have been challenging more mergers and zealously pursuing novel antitrust arguments. While they have been largely unsuccessful in the courtroom, they have had a cooling effect on Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) activity and have dragged out many announced deals, reducing arbitrage rates of return and increasing volatility.
We expect Khan and Kantor to either resign or be replaced in relatively short order in the new administration and a return to normalcy in US antitrust enforcement and an uptick in M&A activity. We are already seeing some evidence of this with many merger arbitrage spreads tightening immediately post-election.
Do I want Trump to do a bunch of **** up **** to prove my concerns were correct and well-founded? Or… Do I want Trump to be a decent President, and prove that my sources of information are **** terrible?
Joined: Nov 10, 2013 Posts: 17750 Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
You want the second thing
I am absolutely floored by how many people, including my mom, want the first thing
I thought of you when I was writing up the economic impact of the election cuz you, more than anyone I know, have expressed pain and anxiety over lack of government intervention around inflation. I do strongly believe trump and this administration will do a ton of stuff regarding inflation policy. So I think you’ll be pleased on that front.
—-/
Btw Cucho, I don’t think that write up is great. I didn’t write it this time, I just did a few edits. I think it’s all over the place and trying to do too much, but that was the ask this time around. The merger arbitrage aspect is really interesting to me even tho it doesn’t impact the majority of people. It’s just a highly impacted area by the election result.
Tarifs will be problematic and a drag but it won’t be Brexit level stuff or even close to it, despite what media frames as important. The currency movements will be a really big deal. US dollar will Strengthen, Canadian dollar is gonna really get hurt lol
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum