The thing is that this was supposed to be a close race, it it was not, but the incentives to vote where there.
I keep seeing this a lot and I'd like to point out something using some numbers
From Pennsylvania
Donald Trump 50.4% 3,477,222
Kamala Harris 48.5% 3,342,438
Wisconsin
Donald Trump 49.6% 1,697,237
Kamala Harris 48.8% 1,668,757
That's without the other candidates who were on the ballot who did get votes including Robert F. Kennedy Jr. So, while nationally it wasn't close, in some of the states it was/is close.
Exactly.
The final tallys had a huge difference. The states that have 1 or 2 large Democrat cities vs dozens of rural red counties were the ones that were close and that mattered. Forget the millions of votes difference nationally. It's the small margins she lost by (or lost ground compared to Biden) within those big cities that mattered. That's where 14% Hispanic, 7% Asian and 1% Black swung the race in Trumps favor.
Take Michigan for example. Detroit alone reps 50% of Mich population. The other 50% are rural red counties. Biden lost nearly every single county except Wayne County (Where Detroit is). But he won Michigan. In 2020 Biden got 197k (95%) of Wayne Co. Trump got 7.2k (3.5%) in 2024, Harris got 221k (90%) and Trump got 19.6k (8%)
Even in areas where there was a higher voter turnout than 2020, she lost ground. About 5% in Detroit. Which caused/helped her to lose Michigan by about 90k votes.
I just looked at Wisconsin and Georgia and the same thing happens there. She loses a few percentages in all the big city blue counties and that adds up to a slight loss in each important state. These are all states that Biden stole from Republicans last election.