It is currently Sat Nov 30, 2024 10:02 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Oct 26, 2024 4:38 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 28, 2016
Posts: 3552
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
That's every sanctioned constructed format, if we're taking notes.

_________________
nice quotes from this forum

War of the spark will have so many Planeswalkers, they won't even be planeswalking anymore.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2024 8:28 pm 
Online
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 14140
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
After the D&D set was a disappointment WOTC said they wouldn't make that sort of thing standard legal again.
Then the Lord Of The Rings set was pretty awesome and everybody thought it would have been great in standard. (It helps that nobody liked the standard of the time)
Now we're getting a universes beyond in standard and it's... Spiderman? Wow, Spidey's way more of a stretch than either of the last two.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 27, 2024 10:48 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 13, 2015
Posts: 9132
TPmanW wrote:
After the D&D set was a disappointment WOTC said they wouldn't make that sort of thing standard legal again.

Where did you see that it was a disappointment? Especially after they followed it with the Baldur's Gate set.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 29, 2024 9:58 pm 
Online
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 14140
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
neru wrote:
TPmanW wrote:
After the D&D set was a disappointment WOTC said they wouldn't make that sort of thing standard legal again.

Where did you see that it was a disappointment? Especially after they followed it with the Baldur's Gate set.

I thought everybody hated it? Just in my personal experience, everyone was meh at best on it. I never heard WOTC's official stance on the D&D set, but they promised not to make nonMTG properties standard legal after it came out. From there I assumed the set didn't meet expectations.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2024 2:37 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 28, 2016
Posts: 3552
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
TPmanW wrote:
they promised not to make nonMTG properties standard legal after it came out.
They sure did.

You know, there was a time when there was a promise not to make Mythic Rare a tier for arbitrarily overpowered cards. And when it was first broken, people noticed, and didn't like it, and there was an entire webcomic called Lotus Cobra is Evil shining light on the idea that a generic, super simple and unimpactful but hyperefficient mythic is egregious.

There was a time Sol Ring was on a reserved list. The reserved list was never abolished, but apparently some cards were excluded from it. I am all in favor of abolishing it btw, but no apparently we can't do that because it's a sacred promise but we can remove cards from it because yeah.

What is a promise, really? Do words of a promise hold any meaning unless the decision-making algorithm of the entity uttering those words can be inspected and found to be stably functioning in such a way as to have no way to easily deviate from it, like how liberal democracies with strong rule of law have no easy way to deviate from constitutional promises to population; or unless the entity being promised something has a capacity to remember and rationally and legibly react to breaches of promise, to defect back at the defector in a way that is distinguishable from noise?

Tolarian Community College linked this great article I can't recommend enough: https://every.to/p/breaching-the-trust- ... n-business

_________________
nice quotes from this forum

War of the spark will have so many Planeswalkers, they won't even be planeswalking anymore.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group