This is pretty similar to the mercenary tokens in Thunder Junction, just with an added toughness buff and the ability to activate them the turn they enter. Brimstone Roundup and Prickly Pair suggest you're getting a real deal if you can get 3 munitions for 2 mana. Munitions are no good on the defense and have no surprise factor, but it's a permanent, transferable and divisible +3/+3. Even if these just sac'd to make +1/+1 counters I'd suggest cutting the munitions your card makes
Munitions are complicated, but not much moreso than merc tokens, so it seems printable. I could see something a whole lot like munitions getting printed.
Flavorfully, munitions get used up, so I'd have gone with weapons or some abstract "charging up" for the flavor basis.
6



I don't feel like seals have enough utility to see print in the same numbers as the other trinkets. This would be a fine design as a standalone enchantment, but it's hard to envision the necessary level of graveyard themes and enchantment removal overlapping in more than one future set.
Edit- oops. I missed that seals can sacrifice themselves. My thoughts ont he particular card are mostly unchanged, but this makes the concept of the trinket you invented better. Looks like I'm bumping you up from last place.

7?



Untapping is a clean and simple thing for a trinket to do. I wish it happened at sorcery speed to keep board complexity down. If you have the biggest creature on the battlefield easy untapping basically gives it vigilance and means you don't have to decide between offense and defense. I worry that's not great for gameflow.
The flavor of the token is solid as is the card that makes it.
7



A little odd that these are enchantments with a colored activation cost, but it fits perfectly as a faction mechanic. Was this made with the Orzhov in mind?
Thankfully you put the sorcery speed restriction on this. It's not a good idea to have a lot of instant-speed combat tricks on board. If anything this sort of feels like the opposite- you're saving up tokens for when you cast your best creature later in the game- this is a clear control strategy.
The card itself has decent flavor and gives you another use for your tokens, a la Sweettooth Witch. Having two trinket-sacrifice abilites on one card (effectively 3 total) is a bit much but not horrible. It would have been cooler if one ability cost and one cost .
7


A mill token? I'm torn. On one hand, this is a great way to shoehorn mill onto cards that fit into non-mill decks so there's actually enough mill in a set to make a proper archetype. On the other hand it's a little weird that you don't just mill right away- there's rarely a strategic reason to hold off on the mill like there is with a combat buff or mana. But then I guess that applies to food as well.
Yeah, I'm sold.
The undermine/secret link isn't as strong as investigate/clue, but I don't hate it. I wouldn't have gone that route, but I don't hate it.
THe card as a whole fits together. Flavorfully, you've got the espionage angle and mechanically, you're buying time for milling.
9


Surprised the flavor is Ravnican, when the mechanics feel like something out of Ikoria.
The +1/+1 counter doesn't feel entirely necessary to the design. I don't know that it hurts this particular card too much. I can see how this gives you incentive to use up your potions instead of accumulating 5 potions of 3 different types waiting for the right moment. I'd still prefer the cleaner design without the counter. That would just leave more room for design.
Obviously this points to a bunch of other potions existing. That would do a lot to eat up a set's complexity, but is also really, really cool.
Powerwise this seems in line with Corrupted Conviction &co.
Flavor's pretty good. Although "pulverize" doesn't feel like the Golgari way. Those guys would drain your vital fluids or something.
8



I really like the concept here. A somewhat soft take on a prison deck. is a bit much to pay though, particularly when it's quite likely the thing you don't untap is a land and you effectively pay . In the early game that's just back-breaking. That's kind of the problem with the execution on this particular card too.
If I'm distracted going into the start of turn 3, I likely have to spend every resource I have to break the distraction. If I don't have a 3rd land and I have to tap one, I simply cannot pay the cost to become undistracted. Just like that I'm down a land and a turn behind for probably the rest of the game. A lot of decks will have trouble actually blocking the Vizier, so it's either play removal real fast or be locked out of the game. And you're oppoennt's drawing an extra card on top of all this too.
Even if you upped the casting cost to you'd have to downgrade the evasion or limit it to only planting a counter on undistracted players for this to be printable. Maybe you remove the distraction to draw the card? Perhaps it's mandatory a 2 or more counters?
Any way you cut it, a card with this much griefer potential should never be this pushed.
There's a cool idea here, but the card just doesn't deliver. I'd look at Ossia's pester mechanic for ideas on rebalanceing.
7

Basic, clean, and... wait, these things don't sacrifice. That's kind of crazy. I know sorcery speed limits things but wow, 1W to have a floating and divisible +3/+3 forever? That seems kind of not okay. You can spread, you can stack, you can change your mind. It's pretty nuts. Equipment is probably the most comparable trait. Three Leonin Scimitars that equip for free but don't give their plusses off turn? for two mana to get them and just have them?



This one needs a lot of odd tech to work. The card is sort of sensible: it's a selectable Raise Dead/Cremate-sans-cantrip, but the seal tech seems rather forced here. All seals do on their own is break, and "create a seal exiling..." is a really odd construction. Also, since you MAY put the card into its owner's had, I don't think there's any reason to ever not immediately sac the seal, since you can return your card or perma-exile your enemy's right away?



This is fairly clean and sensible. I think putting a mana cost on the potion was a good idea, since arbitrary untaps can get kinda odd. "Enters or attacks" is a bit strong, butI think these days it's probably needed that this produce the steady stream of potions. All in all, a fine include.



The extra "Sac a blessing" tries to use the tech, but I don't think Blessings would make it as +1/+1 counters with extra steps. The card as a whole isn't the worst, but I don't think the mechanic would really make it to print like that, which borks the whole thing



Vapor Snag says this probably could have cost a single blue. A "Sac to mill" trinket seems pretty reasonable. 2 mana and the trinket to mill 3 is harsh, but I guess foods seem pretty undertuned as well until you start to amass them and mess with math.



I worry about the complexity of having multiple kinds of potions. The card is nice, though, paying to get a pretty handy rider on top of Village Rites, which is alreayd a decent card. Given that your ability potions can be used right away, this thing could swing a combat to hell for two mana by eating one chump blocker and granting deathtouch to make another trade... but it does need a fairly specific setup to go for big gotcha, so that's fair. It might be a wee bit undercost, like maybe it could be BB because of the versatility of being able to save the potion rather than just stapling Coat with Venom onto Rites, but it's nice even if I feel like the tech is questionable.



I'm in love, but it feels so, so, taboo. Distractions are a hillarious damned if you do, damned if you don't setup. Now, there is some ambiguity: if a player is not totally tapped down, but they are distracted, do they have to leave something tapped? If so, it gets really nasty should they build up (which they are just expensive enough to remove to make plausible) since you could draw go and then not be able to untap a dang thing next turn if your tapped stuff count is less than your distraction count. Not even Winter Orb does that. I feel like maybe they should work like Tangle Wire and force their controller to tap something down at the beginning of their upkeep. Since that trigger will go on the stack, it'll do its job even if the victim pays before it resolves, but it would be a little clearer and mean you could chip away at your distractions as long as you have two mana to your name. The body delivering those distractions, a 1/1 skulk for 2, seems ideal. Fast enough that it might start getting in while crippling, reasonably evasive, the works. The card draw might push it a little over the top; if I'm staxing a player out because they have to spend all their mana to be able to untap next time, or leave their mana up to bop a distraction, I'm already kind of winning. And, of course, that's with only Vizier as a distraction source. If the mechanic expanded at all it could create a very nasty lock very quickly. Great job playing to my favorite corners of the game, and the design feels very nicely tuned for a Commander that's getting faster on the whole but... yeah I don't know how healthy this is.

1: Otu
2: Dudibus
3: Lily
4: ty
5: ELC
6: Confused
7: Rag