That's a good point I guess about 4th vs 5th. I just think that the 4th vote just opens a lot of doors. Scum could hammer and then claim they didn't know how many votes there were. Town could hammer and actually not know how many there are. lot of downsides for a random vote.

Votecount 1.5
Aaarrrgh (2): DaRkStAr, M0nster
DaRkStAr (2): KingofDominaria, Hello World
JayDreven (1): Ragnarokio
Ragnarokio (1): Naga

Not voting: Aaarrrgh, JayDreven

Day 1 Deadline is on Saturday at 7 PM EST. With 8 players alive, the Majority is 5 votes.

Approx. 24 hours remain to the Day (at time of writing).

There is currently a tie for the most number of votes. Per the rules, if the deadline is reached and there is still a tie, no one will be Lynched.

The Mod has been satiated by Naga's involvement and rescinds his prodding.

@JD: That is indeed correct. I stand corrected on my assessment of the events.

Also, the stated argument, in your post, isn't invalid. My stated argument of DarkStar having the Jeep tell against him twice is though. Invalid, that is. The first instance of the Jeep tell is still valid.


@Naga: What shot? I read Monster's post.

unvote
vote: argh

Any explanation Rag?

jeep tell is bad and getting bad vibe from argh and dont want tie

Is it here like in among us, where nonvoting also counts?

The wagon on me hadn't failed at the point of dark's jump therefore the argument that he's jumping from a failed wagon to any other wagon IS invalid, especially considering he's second vote on Aaarrrgh. Secondly the other instance of jeeping was blatantly false. Meaning the only thing on dark was that he was third on my wagon, which is far less scummy than either HW's blatant wagoning today or Rag's fourth vote combined with urging to hammer "for the lulz".

I'm going to Vote: KoD

His two smear campaigns based on "mistakes" today combined with his jumping off Aaarrrgh when that wagon garnered some speed seem to be the scummiest things today in my eyes.

Voting "No Lynch" would equate to a skip in most games here. Simply not voting is more just not putting an opinion out.

Ah thanks, didn't know about that.

Ugh, I don't want to die, but pushing for a D1 lynch of a new player doesn't feel great. Which I guess means that my best option is to

Vote: KoD

I guess, since we're close to deadline and I don't know how active I'll be before then, I should also take this opportunity to claim a minor power role. I will not give any details unless that would be absolutely necessary to prevent my lynch.

I guess Aaarrrgh will vote me and then we have a tie. That's totally fine by me.
I think lynching anyone on D1 without any real evidence and with just 3 votes makes not much sense.

Nevermind, I am reading Aaarrrgh's post right now..
I am always open to unvote, so we have tie again.
What do you guys think?

Also, I just realized that I never claimed my No Lie Policy this game! It is active, and to the best of my knowledge everything I have said so far this game, as well as anything I might say in the future, except in such cases where it would confirm my alignment (it the alignment of anyone else) without a mechanical basis for that confirmation, is true.

i woll vote to prevent ties

Can you explain why?

death good for info

Oh we have a swerve coming in.

Unvote, Vote: Arrgh