@Zinger:
1) The focus is on the implication. Given the scenario (CL is Santa), then the consequence is that I must be Krampus. Why would I ever admit to that? That's why I made a point to say from my perspective, that cannot be the case (as opposed to anyone else looking in which case it is a valid scenario). My focus is on giving my thoughts throughout all of this.
2) All scenarios require assumptions. You're not saying anything new. My 1 and 2 are simply scenarios detailing whether or not CL is/is not Krampus. The assumptions are apparent. The consequences that follow are apparent. You pointing out that assumptions must be made to get to that point is no different than me pointing out that you have to assume different things to get to certain points.
"Given the scenario (CL is Santa), then the consequence is that I must be Krampus."
But that's not true. As I pointed out in my post to you, if you accept the scenario that CL is Santa, and Argh and I are Paranoid and Insane respectively, then
Tevish, not you, could still be the dirty party. My question to you was why would you suggest that
you must be Krampus in scenario 1, when A) Tevish could still be Krampus and you're ignoring that, and B) you ostensibly know you're not Krampus, therefore in your mind, if scenario 1 were proven true, that should confirm Tevish as Krampus to you.
Am I not making sense? Your suggested Scenario 1 doesn't result in a consequence of you being Krampus. It results in a consequence of you or Tevish being Krampus. I don't know why you, as hypothetical Krampus, would not choose to throw shade on Tevish, so I must accept that you're probably confused? Maybe? Probably not alignment indicative... But yeah, don't muddy the waters. You're trying to say Scenario 1 is impossible in your perspective because Scenario 1 = KoD is Krampus, but I'm saying that's just not a given even if we assumed Scenario 1 were true.