Its blatantly close enough to a iconographic depiction of the goddess Lakshmi that Shivam Bhatt objected to it pretty forcefully as appropriation of his religion and culture.
For what it’s worth, Lakshmi is a goddess of wealth, fortune, and fertility—or “bounty,” if you will, so it’s not just a cosmetic resemblance.
If it was a Loxodon of Knowledge or something I'd buy it, but Hinduism is a religion full of multi-handed goofs who collectively have the entire dictionary as their domain and several depictions each, you could make it a celebrant of destruction and suddenly it would be cultural appropriation of some other Hindu god. Having more than two hands and referencing bounty is not blatantly anything, it is equally likely that it draws upon Naga myth.
Wikipedia wrote:
The mythological serpent race that took form as cobras often can be found in Hindu iconography. The nāgas are described as the powerful, splendid, wonderful and proud semidivine race that can assume their physical form either as human, partial human-serpent or the whole serpent. Their domain is in the enchanted underworld, the underground realm filled with gems, gold and other earthly treasures called Naga-loka or Patala-loka. They are also often associated with bodies of waters — including rivers, lakes, seas, and wells — and are guardians of treasure.
Not that it matters, even if it did. Drawing upon cultural symbols, religious or otherwise, is not a sin.
I'd like to see fewer deities show up in the Magic cosmology though, but I don't think Kaldheim is going to comply.