I was watching SuperJJ play a very similar list to that one this morning, only one or two cards different. I'm trying to recall his 4th gold card, he wasn't using Renew.
Just looked it up; Geralt:Aard. Interesting; generally Regis:Higher Vampire and Caretaker are more common in that slot.
I actually sat down last night to play and quickly went 3-0 in casual with Queensguard, felt good. Is it seeing any play in ranked? Can it hang? I'm off Friday so I have to decide on a deck for my ranked climb by then. Skellige is my jam but this doesn't feel like the patch for me if what I'm reading above is true.
Queensguard suffers from many different factors, making it not a good choice right now IMO (and it hurts me to accept it)
-Wanting to win round 1, but absolutely not having the tools for it. King Bran, Draig Bon-Dhu and others just leave you behind on tempo too much.
-Not having a fifth good Bronze in general. What are your Bronzes aside from Priestess, Queensguard, Raider, Warmonger and the 1-of Skirmisher? Pirates are underpowered without Ships and vice versa, but you ain't got the space to fit them all. Swim tried running Whale Harpooners, after some testing I was rather underwhelmed though; and a card like Clan Torrodach Shieldsmith just feels so mediocre...
-Horrendous match-up versus Monsters as well as meh match-ups versus ST and NR.
Interesting.
I still think it's very rare that I can't generate 16+ points with Scorch, though. It feels criminally underutilized.
Agree it's underutilized. It's not so much that I can always generate 16+ points, but even if I can't, it pulls its weight. It bypasses armor, and the most popular decks all have units vulnerable to it.
The meta snapshot is interesting. After all my games with Eredin I think NR is the hardest matchup (armor counters weather), followed by move ST (3x bronze weather clear and plenty of ways to escape the damage). On the other hand I haven't lost to Emyr ever since I started blacklisting WH Hounds instead of Biting Frost, and Dagon is very beatable. In fact looking at the Dagon list I don't really understand why it's so effective vs. Eredin. It's only got two rows of weather, it's fully vulnerable to weather spam, it makes big minions that die to stuff like Scorch. Heck, the vaunted Toad Prince + Manticore + Katakan play just ends up feeding 34 points to said Scorch. Harald the Cripple as one of the worst matchups also doesn't make sense. I don't think I've lost a single game against Axemen - they're completely reliant on the two gold weather cards, so after the first one I pass, and clear the second with Abaya, and the game is mine.
I suppose I should play more on the ladder. Is there a difference between the pro ladder and the normal ladder? I know Ordev said there's no reason at all to play on the normal ladder, but for some reason after winning on the pro ladder I don't seem to be gaining MMR (?)
Scorch is interesting, but most of the time Merigold's Hailstorm just generates more points (especially if you can move units around) and most decks don't have the room to run both. That being said, try it out.
Can't really give much input on Eredin vs. Dagon as I'm not playing either deck myself; my thought process is that Eredin might have problems dealing with carryover and Dagon having generally slightly better tempo plays to dominate the rounds. That being said, I don't know what your Eredin list looks like.
Harald having a good match-up vs. Eredin makes sense seeing how Harald always has access to Whale Harpooner plus Lacerate.
Regarding the ladders, I think if you are still building your collection and don't have ambitions I'd suggest just playing the normal ladder as you get your rank-up rewards there (pro ladder doesn't count into normal MMR since the pro ladder uses a very own MMR system).