It is currently Sun Dec 01, 2024 2:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 320 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 16  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:33 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 17, 2014
Posts: 1700
divinevert wrote:
how ****'ing great were Portent and Ponder doe?

Reprint those, Magic.


Tbh I would be happy with just about any of the good/decent 1cmc filtering spells. Serum Visions, Preordain, Sleight of Hand.......just something.

_________________
My new Twitch channel: https://www.twitch.tv/paradigmenigmata

Xbox Gamertag: LingeringEnigma


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 3:47 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 8960
Location: Brazil
felbatista wrote:
Modulo wrote:

Strongly disagree on that notion. Card selection, as provided by Telling Time, is incredibly important in control decks because you need to line up the correct answers to the opposing threats - not just the answer you have in hand.
Top-level control decks run Anticipate for exactly that reason, and while I agree that Anticipate is better than Telling Time most of the time, this doesn't change the fact that card selection is mandatory. I am okay with cutting one Telling Time because Cycling does provide a little bit of card selection as well, but it's not enough to fully get rid of Telling Time.




Uh, except you're not exactly disagreeing with me. Early game card selection is super important to a control deck, and I never said otherwise. In fact, it's so important that we had to use a bad card like Telling Time (Which is a lot worse than Anticipate, or Azorius Charm, or Think Twice) for that role. The role TT fulfills is mandatory, but the card itself isn't, when we have other options to do the job, which wasn't the case before, but it is now.


I think that is kind of the point though.

That early game selection is very important to the deck, to the point where we are running a meh card (TT). The thing is though, I honestly am not sold on the idea of us having other options. Censor is definitely a lot more flexible, but in regards to that particular role (early game selection) it is even worse than the meh card we are already running. I don't know if the added flexibility of the counterspell side of the card is worth losing out on the better card selection early on.

This is why I am currently thinking a 2/2 split is the best answer. We would still have 2 copies of TT for that early game filtering (and 2 copies of Censor to provide the same effect if needed), while still trying to keep as many copies of Censor in as we can to up the chances of getting them early when we really need the tempo advantage from the counterspell side.

I don't think Censor can completely replace TT, as much as I hate to say it. Although I do think the addition of Censor means that TT is no longer an automatic 3 of for us.


If you get to counter something with Censor on T2, you're giving up the filtering, yes. But you're trading it for something better (removing a threat). Replacing TT with Censor is like saying "I'm willing to filter at a little worse rate for the opportunity to get a significantly better deal a good percentage of the time". That said, early game card filtering is so important that I'm willing to start with a 3/1 split in favor of Censor.

All this conversation and we had yet to mention T2 Fatal Push your 2-drop, Cycle Censor. You're basically casting 2 spells on turn 2 (your removal and your filtering), and that kind of card velocity is how you win a game of Magic.

_________________
Yes, I'm from Brazil and no, I'm not an annoying ****.

RPG characters


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:04 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 28, 2015
Posts: 5102
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: uhhhhh
felbatista wrote:
All this conversation and we had yet to mention T2 Fatal Push your 2-drop, Cycle Censor. You're basically casting 2 spells on turn 2 (your removal and your filtering), and that kind of card velocity is how you win a game of Magic.


Since you're largely holding back from reviewing in the "Let's All Review" things, are you as bullish on Drake Haven as I am? It's not an Esper Draw-Go deck card, but I think it will find a home in some competitive decks this season.

_________________
KLD Season King of the Hill Winner.
EMN Season King of the Hill Winner.

The one true King of NGA Magic Duels on Xbox One.

You want some? Come get some. You don't like me? Bite me.

Day 1,000 of the never-ending Vert monarchy.

viewtopic.php?f=38&t=16077

Magic's a simple game, 2 people take turns playing cards and in the end Divinevert wins 2-0...


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:12 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 8960
Location: Brazil
divinevert wrote:
felbatista wrote:
All this conversation and we had yet to mention T2 Fatal Push your 2-drop, Cycle Censor. You're basically casting 2 spells on turn 2 (your removal and your filtering), and that kind of card velocity is how you win a game of Magic.


Since you're largely holding back from reviewing in the "Let's All Review" things, are you as bullish on Drake Haven as I am? It's not an Esper Draw-Go deck card, but I think it will find a home in some competitive decks this season.


I agree, it's not a card for every deck. You need to build around it to a certain extent, and when you do that the card is incredible. Of course at this point you'll be trying to build around a Rare, and that has its own problems. What I ultimately think will make or break the card is if you'll be able to find redundancy for the effect somehwere else, or if said theoretical deck will be able to cycle enough cards to draw Haven often enough, because the power is certainly there.

I'm a big fan of the card, but I don't know if it will find a home.

_________________
Yes, I'm from Brazil and no, I'm not an annoying ****.

RPG characters


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2017 4:20 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 17, 2014
Posts: 1700
felbatista wrote:
felbatista wrote:


Uh, except you're not exactly disagreeing with me. Early game card selection is super important to a control deck, and I never said otherwise. In fact, it's so important that we had to use a bad card like Telling Time (Which is a lot worse than Anticipate, or Azorius Charm, or Think Twice) for that role. The role TT fulfills is mandatory, but the card itself isn't, when we have other options to do the job, which wasn't the case before, but it is now.


I think that is kind of the point though.

That early game selection is very important to the deck, to the point where we are running a meh card (TT). The thing is though, I honestly am not sold on the idea of us having other options. Censor is definitely a lot more flexible, but in regards to that particular role (early game selection) it is even worse than the meh card we are already running. I don't know if the added flexibility of the counterspell side of the card is worth losing out on the better card selection early on.

This is why I am currently thinking a 2/2 split is the best answer. We would still have 2 copies of TT for that early game filtering (and 2 copies of Censor to provide the same effect if needed), while still trying to keep as many copies of Censor in as we can to up the chances of getting them early when we really need the tempo advantage from the counterspell side.

I don't think Censor can completely replace TT, as much as I hate to say it. Although I do think the addition of Censor means that TT is no longer an automatic 3 of for us.


If you get to counter something with Censor on T2, you're giving up the filtering, yes. But you're trading it for something better (removing a threat). Replacing TT with Censor is like saying "I'm willing to filter at a little worse rate for the opportunity to get a significantly better deal a good percentage of the time". That said, early game card filtering is so important that I'm willing to start with a 3/1 split in favor of Censor.

All this conversation and we had yet to mention T2 Fatal Push your 2-drop, Cycle Censor. You're basically casting 2 spells on turn 2 (your removal and your filtering), and that kind of card velocity is how you win a game of Magic.


Fair enough. It is a hard call to make honestly, being able to filter for colors or silverbullet answers early can make or break you, but I definitely get your point about functioning as an answer as well and the tempo/CA advantage that can potentially provide early on. I guess I could see going in favor of Censor though with the current meta, where there are a large amount of significant things being dropped on T2/T3 that demand answers.

_________________
My new Twitch channel: https://www.twitch.tv/paradigmenigmata

Xbox Gamertag: LingeringEnigma


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:07 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 11, 2015
Posts: 1082
Location: Somewhere in Time
So as a rough draft, I think this is the base I'll start testing when Amonkhet drops;

Creature(2)
1x Disciple of the Ring
1x Torrential Gearhulk

Instant(23)
3x Fatal Push
2x Blessed Alliance
3x Censor
1x Pull From Tomorrow
2x Grasp of Darkness
3x Spell Shrivel
2x Scatter to the Winds
2x Anguished Unmaking
3x Glimmer of Genius
2x Confirm Suspicions

Sorcery(2)
2x Languish

Split(1)
1x Commit // Memory

Enchantment(2)
2x Cast Out

Planeswalker(4)
1x Liliana, the Last Hope
1x Gideon, Ally of Zendikar
1x Jace, Unraveler of Secrets
1x Ob Nixilis Reignited

Land(26)
2x Prairie Stream
2x Shambling Vent
1x Plains
2x Sunken Hollow
3x Island
3x Swamp
2x Isolated Chapel
2x Drowned Catacomb
2x Glacial Fortress
4x Evolving Wilds
3x Aether Hub

I really, really wanted to include Telling Time, but I just couldn't make room. I have a feeling I will make cuts for it somewhere after testing; it isn't the best card in the world, but filtering is huge. Depending on what the meta looks like I could see myself dropping Scatter to the Winds and adding in the last Grasp of Darkness and maybe a single Never // Return too.

_________________
My Decks:
Spoiler

'Where is the fighting man?
Am I he?
You would trade every truth
For hollow victories'.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 6:50 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 28, 2014
Posts: 4373
That's a fair point, if we drop Scatter, surely the mana requirements gets easier? Nothing requires until turn 5 then. Do we really need them since they were mostly for lategame countering of threats like PWs that Cast Out now hits?

_________________
^ NGA's resident embodiment of "Poe's Law".


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 9:48 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 11, 2015
Posts: 1082
Location: Somewhere in Time
It could well be that I go:

-2 Scatter to the Wind
+1 Spell Shrivel
+1 Grasp of Darkness

However I'm wary that there are potentially a number of green based decks (Gruul and Simic specifically) that could go big and Spell Shrivel would be less appealing in that match up. I'm sure other people will want to try out all these fancy new control tools too and long games with no creatures would make these changes suck, regardless of if we have access to Cast Out. I think I'll stick with Scatter for the time being and see how things play out.

_________________
My Decks:
Spoiler

'Where is the fighting man?
Am I he?
You would trade every truth
For hollow victories'.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:10 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 10, 2013
Posts: 17753
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
The new avatar works for me


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 10:16 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 11, 2015
Posts: 1082
Location: Somewhere in Time
The new avatar works for me


Everything works on you Barney. You're easier done than said.

_________________
My Decks:
Spoiler

'Where is the fighting man?
Am I he?
You would trade every truth
For hollow victories'.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 2:58 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 28, 2015
Posts: 5102
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: uhhhhh
People are cutting Sorin now huh

_________________
KLD Season King of the Hill Winner.
EMN Season King of the Hill Winner.

The one true King of NGA Magic Duels on Xbox One.

You want some? Come get some. You don't like me? Bite me.

Day 1,000 of the never-ending Vert monarchy.

viewtopic.php?f=38&t=16077

Magic's a simple game, 2 people take turns playing cards and in the end Divinevert wins 2-0...


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:09 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 11, 2015
Posts: 1082
Location: Somewhere in Time
divinevert wrote:
People are cutting Sorin now huh


My list is a draft but I had to cut something from the top end. New tools mean we're tight on space. No way I'm cutting Confirm or Gearhulk so it's a walker. Jace, Ob and Sorin are all competing for spots: testing will tell what I settle on.

_________________
My Decks:
Spoiler

'Where is the fighting man?
Am I he?
You would trade every truth
For hollow victories'.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:20 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 19, 2015
Posts: 1855
I kinda agree on cutting Sorin. Most expensive walker, worst +1 and the -X is not as needed anymore with the better answers to walkers.

_________________
My decks can be found in my deckbuilder archive. Enter here!


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 3:43 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 10, 2013
Posts: 17753
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Worst +1??? I'd like to introduce you to Saheeli Rai...or Tezzeret....or Nahiri


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:05 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 19, 2015
Posts: 1855
Worst +1??? I'd like to introduce you to Saheeli Rai...or Tezzeret....or Nahiri


None of these are run in Esper tho.

_________________
My decks can be found in my deckbuilder archive. Enter here!


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:17 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 10, 2013
Posts: 17753
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Oh... ok then Gideon's +1 is objectively worse

#nothingbutnet


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:29 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: May 05, 2015
Posts: 2821
Location: zz
Identity: Nah.
Preferred Pronoun Set: ---
Modulo wrote:
I kinda agree on cutting Sorin. Most expensive walker, worst +1 and the -X is not as needed anymore with the better answers to walkers.


Meh, Sorin is still a strong planeswalker. His +1 has potential to drain our opponents and his -X can allow us to gain life, which is relevant agaisnt aggro and ramp.

Image

_________________
GameCenter ID: zzmorg82_

Link to my smilies: https://imgur.com/a/HJMsX


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 5:45 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 17, 2014
Posts: 1700
zzmorg82 wrote:
Modulo wrote:
I kinda agree on cutting Sorin. Most expensive walker, worst +1 and the -X is not as needed anymore with the better answers to walkers.


Meh, Sorin is still a strong planeswalker. His +1 has potential to drain our opponents and his -X can allow us to gain life, which is relevant agaisnt aggro and ramp.

Image


Personally I prefer Sorin over Jace.

Jace does a damn good job of filtering for us, but that is about all he does. His -2 gains more value now that we can run more cheap counterspells, but it still likely isn't hugely relevant. His ult doesn't do a great job of closing out games for us either.

Sorin may not filter nearly as well for us, but he still does the job decently while also providing direct damage to the face, more effective removal (read not bounce) that hits both creatures and PWs and gives us some more life gain, and his Ult can actually put someone on a clock, which Jace's doesn't.

While Sorin's -X doesn't seem as necessary anymore with Anguished Unmaking, Cast Out, and Never//Return all available to us, having Sorin around to answer PWs could mean being able to save those other more wide-reaching removal spells (like Cast Out and UA) for other non-creature/non-PW permanents that tend to be a thorn in our side (Tutelage, Visions, Dynavolt, etc). *shrug*

I don't think having that redundancy on PW removal is a bad thing, because all of them have functions outside of just being PW removal. Sorin does a lot more than just function as PW removal, same with Cast Out and UA. Never//Return is a little more narrow, but could still function as GY hate or a chump blocker in a pinch.

_________________
My new Twitch channel: https://www.twitch.tv/paradigmenigmata

Xbox Gamertag: LingeringEnigma


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 7:48 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 28, 2015
Posts: 5102
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: uhhhhh
It's irrelevant, since Sorin should be should stay and Commit should go.

_________________
KLD Season King of the Hill Winner.
EMN Season King of the Hill Winner.

The one true King of NGA Magic Duels on Xbox One.

You want some? Come get some. You don't like me? Bite me.

Day 1,000 of the never-ending Vert monarchy.

viewtopic.php?f=38&t=16077

Magic's a simple game, 2 people take turns playing cards and in the end Divinevert wins 2-0...


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2017 11:49 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 28, 2015
Posts: 5102
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: uhhhhh
Not for nothing, but in the defining match of the Xbox King of the Hill, Sorin did 18 of my 20 damage dealt.

And killed a Disciple of the Ring for good measure.

_________________
KLD Season King of the Hill Winner.
EMN Season King of the Hill Winner.

The one true King of NGA Magic Duels on Xbox One.

You want some? Come get some. You don't like me? Bite me.

Day 1,000 of the never-ending Vert monarchy.

viewtopic.php?f=38&t=16077

Magic's a simple game, 2 people take turns playing cards and in the end Divinevert wins 2-0...


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 320 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ... 16  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group