It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:32 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 7:39 pm 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 14139
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
I'd love to see WOTC split the product line into booster packs for drafting and something else for collecting/constructed.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2016 8:17 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 28, 2016
Posts: 3552
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
1) A category cards aren't "metagame staples", they are just overwhelmingly good for a given archetype. I mean, Lightning Bolt is A card for every red deck in Modern, Inferno Titan is an A card only in red big creatures decks, and Stone Rain is an A card, but for only one archetype.
2) Bannings help, but they are like helping your irrigation system by spitting on earth. Due to the nature of a bell-shaped curve, the optimal amount of bans in a format is... 50% of the card pool. LITERALLY 50%. If you ban the upper half of cards in a power curve, you get the biggest variety of playable cards, because "playable" becomes equal to "average".
Limited is no better then Constructed. In Constructed, you can experiment and lose. In Limited, you can't experiment at all. It's like poker - a game of evaluation. Only good when you're drunk, and the stakes are insane.
The solution is clear - flat, FLAT power level. It is hard, because ANY card significantly better then the cap is not just an A card, but also a source of a dominant deck and a format ruinator. But there is no easy way of creating a balanced game with 1000 moving parts.

_________________
nice quotes from this forum

War of the spark will have so many Planeswalkers, they won't even be planeswalking anymore.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 3:59 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 07, 2013
Posts: 3433
TPmanW wrote:
I'd love to see WOTC split the product line into booster packs for drafting and something else for collecting/constructed.


Constructed demand creates the market that helps offset the price of drafting. Without that, many people would draft much less. It's not logical, but it works for the same reasons that make people buy lottery tickets.

_________________
Go draft, young man, go draft!


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 4:17 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 07, 2013
Posts: 3433
Limited is no better then Constructed. In Constructed, you can experiment and lose. In Limited, you can't experiment at all. It's like poker - a game of evaluation. Only good when you're drunk, and the stakes are insane.
The solution is clear - flat, FLAT power level. It is hard, because ANY card significantly better then the cap is not just an A card, but also a source of a dominant deck and a format ruinator. But there is no easy way of creating a balanced game with 1000 moving parts.


We've now had at least two blocks where experimenting in Limited was doable, and even profitable at the beginning of the format. I still remember fondly decking people with Fleeting Memories, and playing a sealed pool with Aethersquall Ancient, two Dynavolt Tower, Aetherworks Marvel, and tons of red removal. The whole Vehicle thing was a big experiment in evaluation and deck construction, spawned a lot of debate, provided some valuable new insights into Limited play. At first, everybody was enthusing about RW aggro vehicles being the thing to beat in draft; then BW was the big dog; then people started winning with classic control decks featuring Minister of Inquiries as the win condition. Even now, with Kaladesh limited more or less explored, people still manage to draft and win queues with surprising decks.

Which brings me to your second point. A flat power level would kill the game in short order. The exploration of a new Limited format is why I play the game. Evaluation is an essential skill for Limited Magic, but it's a very different game than poker. In poker, you play the players, not the cards; in Magic, you draft to your strengths, thus raising the power level of all decks at the table, and making life interesting.

_________________
Go draft, young man, go draft!


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 02, 2017 1:38 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 7260
Yeah, I don't understand your critique of limited at all. You CAN experiment, but it's definitely a gamble, because you never know what cards get opened, even if you can accurately guess how they will get passed.

_________________
"Everything looks good when your opponent passes 4 turns in a row" -- rstnme
"Something that does not look good when your opponent does nothing is not a thing" -- me


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:16 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 7801
MaRo talks Frontier:

Quote:
henro88 asked:
So, the biggest tournament organizer in Japan found that there was demand for a new non-rotating format and went and created it. We've seen Commander go official, and we've heard comments from you about Tiny Leaders - why is WotC so quiet about Frontier? It's been going strong for a few months now.

markrosewater said:
We’re aware of the format and like all formats we’re keeping an eye on it.


Quote:
teakles asked:
RE Frontier, do you personally like the idea of a new non-rotating format, or do you think a format that rotates less frequently than standard is a better option?

markrosewater said:
I’ve said for a while that there eventually needs to be a format in between Standard and Modern. My guess is non-rotating is better than slowly rotating.

My only issue with Frontier is I’m not sure its starting point is correct. I wouldn’t have included Khans block because I don’t think you want fetches in the format.

_________________
magicpablo666 wrote:
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 10:24 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 28, 2016
Posts: 3552
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
AzureShade wrote:
MaRo talks Frontier:

Quote:
henro88 asked:
So, the biggest tournament organizer in Japan found that there was demand for a new non-rotating format and went and created it...

The Casual.

_________________
nice quotes from this forum

War of the spark will have so many Planeswalkers, they won't even be planeswalking anymore.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 11:25 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 7801
AzureShade wrote:
MaRo talks Frontier:

Quote:
henro88 asked:
So, the biggest tournament organizer in Japan found that there was demand for a new non-rotating format and went and created it...

The Casual.
I don't follow.....Commander was a Casual format created for casual reasons. "Frontier" is meant to be a competitive constructed format that isn't Standard or Modern.

_________________
magicpablo666 wrote:
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 12:02 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 28, 2016
Posts: 3552
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
That was a joke.

_________________
nice quotes from this forum

War of the spark will have so many Planeswalkers, they won't even be planeswalking anymore.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 12:15 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 12283
AzureShade wrote:
MaRo talks Frontier:

Quote:
markrosewater said:
My only issue with Frontier is I’m not sure its starting point is correct. I wouldn’t have included Khans block because I don’t think you want fetches in the format.

hard to argue over that.

_________________
At twilight's end, the shadow's crossed / a new world birthed, the elder lost.
Yet on the morn we wake to find / that mem'ry left so far behind.
To deafened ears we ask, unseen / "Which is life and which the dream?"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 8:47 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Posts: 299
banning fetchlands would look even worse, unless they used the "matches take too long with them" rationale


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 9:15 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 7801
Yeah, but fetch-lands come at a barrier to entry cost and allow for easier builds of "good stuff" decks that mine from more colors.

I expect that, if Wizards is going to jump on a new "Post-Modern" or "Frontier" format to bridge Standard and Modern, they'll probably do it around 2020 and start the cut-off at Origins. By that point there will be about nine blocks to choose from with a diverse card pool, all designed under the two-set model. I assume that, in order to keep the Modern crowd appeased with certain reprints, things like fetch-lands will just end up in Modern and Legacy Masters sets from here on out.

_________________
magicpablo666 wrote:
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 10:37 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 7260
Waiting until their are enough sets post Khans implies that they are not going to reprint Zendikar fetches in standard for a long, long time.

The price of Scalding Tarn is one of the top 5 reasons modern is so annoying. I guess they could print them at uncommon in EM2/MM3, that would be pretty hilarious. Maybe rare is OK, drop the zendikar fetches from $80-40 to $20?

_________________
"Everything looks good when your opponent passes 4 turns in a row" -- rstnme
"Something that does not look good when your opponent does nothing is not a thing" -- me


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 10:42 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 7801
I'm reasonably certain that Fetches will never be a Standard thing ever again (outside of the rare Master Piece/Expedition lottery). There are now other avenues to reprint them to help ease demand while making tons of money and not overly influencing the singles markets that LGS venues depend on.

_________________
magicpablo666 wrote:
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 11:30 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 28, 2016
Posts: 3552
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
Rare lands are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo st00pid. They are among the dullest Rares, but also among the most expensive...

_________________
nice quotes from this forum

War of the spark will have so many Planeswalkers, they won't even be planeswalking anymore.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:33 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Posts: 299
AzureShade wrote:
Yeah, but fetch-lands come at a barrier to entry cost and allow for easier builds of "good stuff" decks that mine from more colors.

I expect that, if Wizards is going to jump on a new "Post-Modern" or "Frontier" format to bridge Standard and Modern, they'll probably do it around 2020 and start the cut-off at Origins. By that point there will be about nine blocks to choose from with a diverse card pool, all designed under the two-set model. I assume that, in order to keep the Modern crowd appeased with certain reprints, things like fetch-lands will just end up in Modern and Legacy Masters sets from here on out.

a post-modern format would imply that modern would be functionally replaced, because the game can only really sustain one non-rotating format

but yeah that is probably the cutoff to choose


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 4:37 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 7801
Well yeah, Modern would become the new Legacy, played only by those with real money or well developed collections, and Legacy would be a thing that collectors do for fun in their basements or conventions, playing around with cards too expensive or rare to reasonably field a tournament for, like Vintage is now.

_________________
magicpablo666 wrote:
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 10, 2017 6:46 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 8248
Identity: Spambot
Preferred Pronoun Set: 0, 1
AzureShade wrote:
Well yeah, Modern would become the new Legacy, played only by those with real money or well developed collections, and Legacy would be a thing that collectors do for fun in their basements or conventions, playing around with cards too expensive or rare to reasonably field a tournament for, like Vintage is now.

No, modern would die. I don't think WotC can support modern and frontier at the same time, and I don't think people will play modern after WotC drops support for it.
Replacing modern with a new "modern" doesn't constitute a new format, it constitutes a rotation combined with a name change.

_________________
Any resemblance to actual persons, living or dead, is purely coincidental.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 2:01 am 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 14139
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
I think I would continue to play modern if WOTC dropped support. I stick to non rotating formats and I missed the boat on legacy; no way I can afford a ticket now. Modern dodges the weirdness of the game\s early days while keeping the card pool deep enough that I can find wacky stuff nobody's done before. A new format will need more sets to sway me.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 11, 2017 3:52 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 1853
Location: Belgium
Identity: Wannabe Cyborg
Preferred Pronoun Set: He/His/Him
I'm wondering, would there be a way to have a format with a longer rotation that doesn't have the same problems as Extended had. That would be more likely to attain the stated goals of Frontier.

_________________
"I'm all for screwing with the natural order. The natural order objectively is awful. The natural order includes death, disease, pain, and starvation." --Sam Keeper


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group