Nice! I agree with most, though wouldn't Chandra be a Shaman and choose Flames?
in this context, definitely not. Shamans are a spiritual class, literally. Chandra's flames are from herself. If anything else, she'd be a kineticist specializing in fire.
Quote:
Problem I'm hitting mostly is the idea of neglecting so many class features due to them not applying. While I'm not forcing players into being templated from Nissa, if characters like Nissa and Kiora (tho maybe Kiora's not a druid, but just a summoning-type wizard) don't change into animal forms, that's no less than 3 major class features ignored.
well that's why I chose Hunter and Summoner for those two. Neither use Wildshape, but have some of the right mechanics for the character as they are.
Quote:
Nissa doesn't do that either. What's a good solution? I'm sure I may run into similar problems with other established characters, but for now Nissa the Wildshape-less Druid is causing me troubles.
Hunter focuses on the animal companion and working in conjunction with it, not having a wild shape at all.
There's a archetype in one of the books that lets you choose plant beings instead of an animal, so I'd apply that template to it.
Well I'm using 5th Edition D&D in conjunction with Plane Shift: Zendikar atm, and 5th Edition is very rudimentary with classes atm (presumably that's supposed to be a good thing?) there's only Barbarian, Bard, Cleric, Druid, Fighter, Monk, Paladin, Ranger, Rogue, Sorcerer, and Warlock. And recently Mystic (psionics user) thanks to Unearthed Arcana. Nissa definitely fits Druid flavorfully, but with SUCH a focus on Wild Shape, she doesn't do much with it. So while realistically I think she's a Druid with some Ranger skills, she might as well be a Ranger with some Druid skills, or not even a Druid at all, unfortunately. Considering VERY few MTG creatures/characters (even ones labeled as druids) actually turn into animals, the Druid class is basically moot.