It is currently Wed Dec 04, 2024 10:39 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 7:00 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Apr 03, 2014
Posts: 815
neru wrote:
I think you're generally delving into the issues with D&D alignment.

In 3/3.5, Law, Chaos, Good, and Evil are objective multiuniversal forces. There is nothing about points of view. In 4E and 5E, these are not so much objective forces, but there is a sense of a degree of objectivity because Good and Evil are defined and they would be useless textually if they were solely based on perspective.

Being Good includes true respect for life and consideration for other beings' dignity and well-being to the point of personal sacrifice. Being Evil means destroying life, harming and oppressing others, arbitrarily or for personal gain. Being Neutral means either 1. not having the commitment to do great harm to others nor to make personal sacrifices to help others (aka Unaligned in 4/5) or 2. being committed to maintaining personal and/or universal balance between the two.

Heliod has demonstrated that he is willing to kill for no reason other than personal displeasure. He exalts himself in his actions, which include destruction and murder. That he feels justified or that he may delude himself into imagining he is maintaining order does not preclude his actions being Evil.

Edit: In another way, a zealot who pursues Goodness to the point of losing perspective, not respecting life and dignity, taking immoral means toward a Good end has become Neutral at best and potentially Evil.
Does this not mean Heliod could be Lawful Neutral at best? He's done 2 "inherently" evil acts, and probably plenty of Good acts off-screen, and the evils he has commited did fall into the category of Lawful. This way, an evil cleric could just as easily worship Heliod as a good cleric. Not just can Heliod be interpreted this way, but most of his followers (Elspeth & Kytheon included) were pretty Lawful Good, but I must admit that Heliod's evil actions cannot allow him to qualify as Good.

_________________
:r::w: Milov Lask: Philomancer :planeswalker: :w: Heliana: Cleric :planeswalker: :g: Tsuchigo: Orochi Jade Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Frida Wandern: Culinomancer :planeswalker:
:b::g: Aran: Drow Archer Wizard :planeswalker: :g::w: Zilin Kast: Half-Elf Druid :planeswalker: :u::b: Valin Drom: Egomage :planeswalker: :r: Raff: Crimson Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Chrysanos: Leonin Wildmage :planeswalker: :w::b: Whulsi: Loxodon Healer :planeswalker:


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 8:51 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 3846
Don't let the focus on D&D speculation lead to square pegging and ignoring canon.

Its entirely possible that Heliod did some Good acts in the past, and given the fact that its heavily implied that the personality of Theros gods shifts in accordance to their worshippers' changing views it's very likely that some previous itteration of him was benevolent.

But this current incarnation is pretty clearly Evil. Before murdering Elspeth (and making THREE attempts on her life on the course of Godsend, no less), he waged war against Purphoros because the god of the forge wouldn't bow to him. His antagonism against Xenagos is less because the planeswalker was a threat to Theros and more out of outrightly having his power being threatened. His mentality is that of a very petty child, and almost everyone in story, from gods to Ajani, recognises him for what he truly is: a vile, disgustingly immoral being.

In fact, I'm not even sure if he's Lawful. He might very well be the rare example of a Neutral Evil character.

_________________
Matahouroa
Planeswalker's Guide
The Story

My Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/Carliro
Image

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DKFQ7Q38/ a book based on Lusitanian Mythology


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:20 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Apr 03, 2014
Posts: 815
Don't let the focus on D&D speculation lead to square pegging and ignoring canon.

Its entirely possible that Heliod did some Good acts in the past, and given the fact that its heavily implied that the personality of Theros gods shifts in accordance to their worshippers' changing views it's very likely that some previous itteration of him was benevolent.

But this current incarnation is pretty clearly Evil. Before murdering Elspeth (and making THREE attempts on her life on the course of Godsend, no less), he waged war against Purphoros because the god of the forge wouldn't bow to him. His antagonism against Xenagos is less because the planeswalker was a threat to Theros and more out of outrightly having his power being threatened. His mentality is that of a very petty child, and almost everyone in story, from gods to Ajani, recognises him for what he truly is: a vile, disgustingly immoral being.

In fact, I'm not even sure if he's Lawful. He might very well be the rare example of a Neutral Evil character.
It could be interpreted as him having a problem with Purphoros due to the White-Red conflict...

ANY WAY, then what should mechanically be done? Have a special clause for Clerics and Paladins of Heliod? You may be any Lawful, Evil, OR Good, regardless of HIS alignment?

_________________
:r::w: Milov Lask: Philomancer :planeswalker: :w: Heliana: Cleric :planeswalker: :g: Tsuchigo: Orochi Jade Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Frida Wandern: Culinomancer :planeswalker:
:b::g: Aran: Drow Archer Wizard :planeswalker: :g::w: Zilin Kast: Half-Elf Druid :planeswalker: :u::b: Valin Drom: Egomage :planeswalker: :r: Raff: Crimson Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Chrysanos: Leonin Wildmage :planeswalker: :w::b: Whulsi: Loxodon Healer :planeswalker:


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:36 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 12284
Don't let the focus on D&D speculation lead to square pegging and ignoring canon.

Its entirely possible that Heliod did some Good acts in the past, and given the fact that its heavily implied that the personality of Theros gods shifts in accordance to their worshippers' changing views it's very likely that some previous itteration of him was benevolent.

But this current incarnation is pretty clearly Evil. Before murdering Elspeth (and making THREE attempts on her life on the course of Godsend, no less), he waged war against Purphoros because the god of the forge wouldn't bow to him. His antagonism against Xenagos is less because the planeswalker was a threat to Theros and more out of outrightly having his power being threatened. His mentality is that of a very petty child, and almost everyone in story, from gods to Ajani, recognises him for what he truly is: a vile, disgustingly immoral being.

In fact, I'm not even sure if he's Lawful. He might very well be the rare example of a Neutral Evil character.
It could be interpreted as him having a problem with Purphoros due to the White-Red conflict...

ANY WAY, then what should mechanically be done? Have a special clause for Clerics and Paladins of Heliod? You may be any Lawful, Evil, OR Good, regardless of HIS alignment?

The problem is, the heart of that conflict less in disregarding the freedom of another being that is nominally his equal. He demands obedience tantamount to slavery from literally everything, including Kruphix which is technically his superior.

He doesn't believe in the sovereignty if any life save his own.

_________________
At twilight's end, the shadow's crossed / a new world birthed, the elder lost.
Yet on the morn we wake to find / that mem'ry left so far behind.
To deafened ears we ask, unseen / "Which is life and which the dream?"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:38 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 3846
Just saying, colour alignments don't make conflicts inevitable. Squee didn't despise the mostly aligned Weatherlight crew, for example.

Purphoros wouldn't accept Heliod's authority, and Heliod wouldn't accept another god not bowing before him. Just two aggressive individuals fighting.

_________________
Matahouroa
Planeswalker's Guide
The Story

My Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/Carliro
Image

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DKFQ7Q38/ a book based on Lusitanian Mythology


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 9:48 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Apr 03, 2014
Posts: 815
So then what to do? Heliod is a special case? NE/LE but LG, LN, LE, and NG can worship him?

_________________
:r::w: Milov Lask: Philomancer :planeswalker: :w: Heliana: Cleric :planeswalker: :g: Tsuchigo: Orochi Jade Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Frida Wandern: Culinomancer :planeswalker:
:b::g: Aran: Drow Archer Wizard :planeswalker: :g::w: Zilin Kast: Half-Elf Druid :planeswalker: :u::b: Valin Drom: Egomage :planeswalker: :r: Raff: Crimson Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Chrysanos: Leonin Wildmage :planeswalker: :w::b: Whulsi: Loxodon Healer :planeswalker:


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 10:45 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 3846
\_(ツ)_/¯

Depending on the edition worshippers don't necessarily need to be of the same alignment. 3d had Amaunator in a similar position, with worshippers ranging from Chaotic Good to Lawful Evil, even if the deity himself was Neutral Good.

_________________
Matahouroa
Planeswalker's Guide
The Story

My Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/Carliro
Image

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DKFQ7Q38/ a book based on Lusitanian Mythology


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 11:01 pm 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 14141
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
I think the whole good/evil concept is losing a lot of ground in our culture.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 11:44 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 13, 2015
Posts: 9136
Does this not mean Heliod could be Lawful Neutral at best? He's done 2 "inherently" evil acts, and probably plenty of Good acts off-screen, and the evils he has commited did fall into the category of Lawful.

I don't think it balances it out like that, either in D&D fiction nor in life. Your most generous interpretation, a god who is not self-interested so much as murderously devoted to the established order...is Lawful Evil. A Neutral being simply does not wipe out whole cities of lives, even if they also do benevolent things. If someone is just as likely to murder you as throw you a feast, that being is not a Good nor Neutral being.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 18, 2016 11:53 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Apr 03, 2014
Posts: 815
Then what is Lawful Neutral?

_________________
:r::w: Milov Lask: Philomancer :planeswalker: :w: Heliana: Cleric :planeswalker: :g: Tsuchigo: Orochi Jade Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Frida Wandern: Culinomancer :planeswalker:
:b::g: Aran: Drow Archer Wizard :planeswalker: :g::w: Zilin Kast: Half-Elf Druid :planeswalker: :u::b: Valin Drom: Egomage :planeswalker: :r: Raff: Crimson Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Chrysanos: Leonin Wildmage :planeswalker: :w::b: Whulsi: Loxodon Healer :planeswalker:


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 6:24 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 13, 2015
Posts: 9136
Erebos probably counts here. He is only concerned with the enforcement of the natural order of death. He can be kind but he doesn't go out of his way to do so, nor is he overtly malevolent. I don't think Athreos has much of a defined personality, but he also seems Lawful Neutral, neither benevolent nor malevolent, simply maintaining order.

Ignoring the worse (Grand Arbiter Augustin IV) and the better (Lavinia) elements of Azorius, the Senate is Lawful Neutral as a whole. It is concerned with administration and protection of the law in order to preserve order and nominal peace, but it isn't really concerned about people's dignity or well-being.

The black heroes arguably fall here: Teysa is self-interested but not to the point of malevolence; she will work for the greater good when necessary. It's arguable that she is True Neutral but she is methodical, keeps her promises, and is respectful towards law and authority. Toshi Umezawa can be argued in different ways, but I can see him as Lawful Neutral, a man with certain binding principles and promises, selfish but not malevolent. They both veer towards True Neutral, though.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:16 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 3846
Then what is Lawful Neutral?


Seriously, you're a D&D fan and don't know what "Lawful Neutral" entails?

A Lawful Neutral character is a character focused on a code, either personal or codified as a law, above all else. Heliod is not Lawful Neutral; in the best case scenario, he is taking advantage of order and strcuture for his own ends, a much more Lawful Evil or Neutral Evil approach. A true Lawful Neutral character doesn't use laws as a means, it uses law as a ends.

_________________
Matahouroa
Planeswalker's Guide
The Story

My Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/Carliro
Image

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DKFQ7Q38/ a book based on Lusitanian Mythology


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 11:48 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Apr 03, 2014
Posts: 815
neru wrote:
Erebos probably counts here. He is only concerned with the enforcement of the natural order of death. He can be kind but he doesn't go out of his way to do so, nor is he overtly malevolent. I don't think Athreos has much of a defined personality, but he also seems Lawful Neutral, neither benevolent nor malevolent, simply maintaining order.

Ignoring the worse (Grand Arbiter Augustin IV) and the better (Lavinia) elements of Azorius, the Senate is Lawful Neutral as a whole. It is concerned with administration and protection of the law in order to preserve order and nominal peace, but it isn't really concerned about people's dignity or well-being.

The black heroes arguably fall here: Teysa is self-interested but not to the point of malevolence; she will work for the greater good when necessary. It's arguable that she is True Neutral but she is methodical, keeps her promises, and is respectful towards law and authority. Toshi Umezawa can be argued in different ways, but I can see him as Lawful Neutral, a man with certain binding principles and promises, selfish but not malevolent. They both veer towards True Neutral, though.
But then there was the incident with Vraska, so they must be Lawful Evil.

I'm generally aware of the concept of alignment, but it gets a little foggy figuring out how the two axes work when they are pushed together and pulled apart.

If I recall correctly, wasn't Heliod still deemed king or some form of ruler of the gods? Appointed after his creation? Came to life with this notion? Petulent yes, but if I'm correct and Theran mortals believed the leader of the pantheon was Heliod, and thus Heliod believed it with every fiber of his being, then he was being pretty lawful for a GOD.

_________________
:r::w: Milov Lask: Philomancer :planeswalker: :w: Heliana: Cleric :planeswalker: :g: Tsuchigo: Orochi Jade Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Frida Wandern: Culinomancer :planeswalker:
:b::g: Aran: Drow Archer Wizard :planeswalker: :g::w: Zilin Kast: Half-Elf Druid :planeswalker: :u::b: Valin Drom: Egomage :planeswalker: :r: Raff: Crimson Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Chrysanos: Leonin Wildmage :planeswalker: :w::b: Whulsi: Loxodon Healer :planeswalker:


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 12:45 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 13, 2015
Posts: 9136
If you're referring to the Azorius wrt Vraska, as I said, they as an organization are Lawful Neutral, concerned with keeping order more so than protecting individual rights or considering dignity and well-being. Individual members of Azorius may be Lawful Evil, may even be alignments that aren't Lawful, but the Azorius is itself Lawful Neutral, imo.

The Orzhov Syndicate similarly probably has a mix of people who are genuinely Lawful Good or Lawful Neutral or Neutral Evil or True Neutral, but as an organization as a whole, it's Lawful Evil.

I don't think Heliod cannot be Lawful but: Being a king doesn't make one Lawful, nor does believing one is an authority in one's actions. Heliod, as a protector of law and common agreements and the bonds between mortals, is Lawful. But in his personal actions, he is untrustworthy and capricious. The only saving grace there in terms of his Lawfulness is that it seems like he is always genuinely committed. I did not read the Theros books, but if he is forthright and open even as his heart flips and flops, then I can see him being Lawful with consideration to his portfolio. Lawful allows for hypocrisy and arbitrariness within the overall code of conduct.

Also, Good/Evil, Law/Chaos does not differ for a god as for a mortal. Again, these are objective standards. Having vast amounts of power does not release one from the moral/ethical constraints of D&D alignment.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jul 19, 2016 2:36 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 3846
Heliod's authorithy is recognised by his followers alone; none of the gods see him as their ruler, and Kruphix is in various respects his senior.

I'm myself torn about whereas Heliod is Lawful or not, though he seems to view order more as a means to an end.

_________________
Matahouroa
Planeswalker's Guide
The Story

My Patreon:
https://www.patreon.com/Carliro
Image

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0DKFQ7Q38/ a book based on Lusitanian Mythology


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:41 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Apr 03, 2014
Posts: 815
Should Avacyn have 2 alignments; one for before the madness and one during? Or one alignment that describes her fairly regardless of her mental condition, or considering the way the Sanity Score works, only have one alignment that applies only before her descent into madness? I can see in a campaign on Innistrad the DM appropriately changes up a Cleric/Paladin of Avacyn's abilities (as the church's magic and wards have certainly taken a hit, regardless of whether her human followers have decided to worship her as she was/as she is/what she stood for before)

In MTG's case, it feels like since most cleric/paladin spellcasting would still just be insert-color magic with a divine provider, that the worshippers are more crucial than the god itself, heck, clerics of Emeria/Kamsa can still cast what appears to be "holy magic".

Tbh I think Theran pantheon has an interesting hook/twist that I think should be left intact. I'm not justifying Heliod's actions, but I am defending Good clerics/paladins who worship him, unaware of his pettiness, which would best translate to Evil, and his pettiness coming to light is a sweet plot-twist for players.

_________________
:r::w: Milov Lask: Philomancer :planeswalker: :w: Heliana: Cleric :planeswalker: :g: Tsuchigo: Orochi Jade Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Frida Wandern: Culinomancer :planeswalker:
:b::g: Aran: Drow Archer Wizard :planeswalker: :g::w: Zilin Kast: Half-Elf Druid :planeswalker: :u::b: Valin Drom: Egomage :planeswalker: :r: Raff: Crimson Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Chrysanos: Leonin Wildmage :planeswalker: :w::b: Whulsi: Loxodon Healer :planeswalker:


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2016 10:36 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 13, 2015
Posts: 9136
I don't think anyone in this thread thinks it's not okay for Heliod to have clerics that do not have matching alignments.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 20, 2016 11:46 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Apr 03, 2014
Posts: 815
neru wrote:
I don't think anyone in this thread thinks it's not okay for Heliod to have clerics that do not have matching alignments.
That's seemingly what I'm going for, but is that like a mold-breaker? Someone mentioned another god that's flippy-floppy between editions, but how does that work mechanically that obeys the rules? Do I label him Lawful Neutral as an unseen deity and Lawful Evil as an active character? As in his FAITH is Lawful Neutral (or even Lawful Good if that opens up the freedom to change it, though LN makes most sense, as even his supposedly benevolent actions, like smiting demons could be construed as what happens in the underworld stays in the underworld) and if he were to make an appearance he would behave Lawfully & Evilly? Is there concrete precedence for this?

_________________
:r::w: Milov Lask: Philomancer :planeswalker: :w: Heliana: Cleric :planeswalker: :g: Tsuchigo: Orochi Jade Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Frida Wandern: Culinomancer :planeswalker:
:b::g: Aran: Drow Archer Wizard :planeswalker: :g::w: Zilin Kast: Half-Elf Druid :planeswalker: :u::b: Valin Drom: Egomage :planeswalker: :r: Raff: Crimson Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Chrysanos: Leonin Wildmage :planeswalker: :w::b: Whulsi: Loxodon Healer :planeswalker:


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:04 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 13, 2015
Posts: 9136
The documents WotC released for Zendikar and Innistrad are based on 5th Edition, where clerics are not restricted by the alignment of their gods. 4th Edition similarly does not have such a restriction.

In 3/3.5, clerics do have to be within one step of their gods, but there are also nontheistic clerics. Clerics who ultimately derive their power from their faith and conviction. In the Eberron setting, no gods are confirmed as real and all clerics gain their power from faith. The Lawful Good church has an internal Evil cult, and neither lack access to clerical powers.

So, you can have clerics that explicitly derive power from their deity, which means the deity only has to decide that it is worth giving that cleric some of their power. And you can have clerics that derive power from their faith around the deity, which exists outside of the deity's true self.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:32 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Apr 03, 2014
Posts: 815
Oh.... I've overlooked that the whole time. 5th Edition ignores deity-cleric alignment... Well. Lol That changes a lot.

_________________
:r::w: Milov Lask: Philomancer :planeswalker: :w: Heliana: Cleric :planeswalker: :g: Tsuchigo: Orochi Jade Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Frida Wandern: Culinomancer :planeswalker:
:b::g: Aran: Drow Archer Wizard :planeswalker: :g::w: Zilin Kast: Half-Elf Druid :planeswalker: :u::b: Valin Drom: Egomage :planeswalker: :r: Raff: Crimson Mage :planeswalker: :r::g: Chrysanos: Leonin Wildmage :planeswalker: :w::b: Whulsi: Loxodon Healer :planeswalker:


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 49 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group