It is currently Fri Nov 29, 2024 2:44 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1835 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 ... 92  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:17 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 28, 2014
Posts: 4373
jedc22 wrote:
I don't know if this is the real Lili or not yet, but if it is, it's really rather situational...

Image


Erm...yea. I'd hope that isn't real. Following big Jace in terms of "Insert generic X colour abilities". The discard is ok, the -3 is pretty rough given that pretty much ends her, and that ult feels underwhelming.

In comes the "she's great if you do this" crowd, just not very exciting to me.

_________________
^ NGA's resident embodiment of "Poe's Law".


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:19 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 28, 2014
Posts: 4373
On the plus side...

Image

_________________
^ NGA's resident embodiment of "Poe's Law".


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:22 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: May 08, 2014
Posts: 1506
That lil is a bit.... meh.... I hope it's not real.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:28 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: May 05, 2015
Posts: 2821
Location: zz
Identity: Nah.
Preferred Pronoun Set: ---
jedc22 wrote:
I don't know if this is the real Lili or not yet, but if it is, it's really rather situational...

Image


Didn't a card like this get spoiled 2 weeks ago? That card was fake though.

_________________
GameCenter ID: zzmorg82_

Link to my smilies: https://imgur.com/a/HJMsX


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 10:46 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 10, 2013
Posts: 3347
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: He
zzmorg82 wrote:
jedc22 wrote:
I don't know if this is the real Lili or not yet, but if it is, it's really rather situational...

Image


Didn't a card like this get spoiled 2 weeks ago? That card was fake though.

Yeah it's confirmed fake. I believe Liliana gets revealed in the middle of the week and nothing is really supposed to appear on weekends.
Turn Aside was spoiled yesterday by gameinformer and is kinda off regular scheduling (hence it being the only weekend card).

_________________
Cards have names?
Dunno about the cards but my twitch and youtube sure do: https://www.twitch.tv/wrightjustice and https://www.youtube.com/user/Wasomacosalo


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 11:39 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Posts: 1005
zzmorg82 wrote:
Didn't a card like this get spoiled 2 weeks ago? That card was fake though.


Previous faker one had "summon 50 zombies" instead of 13.
Still fake, still a crappy PW for that sweet, sweet Lili.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 11:49 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 26, 2015
Posts: 186
Identity: Lonely Card-Counter
Eh, I won't buy it til it's on mythic spoiler


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 12:42 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mar 18, 2016
Posts: 5360
Location: Anyway the wind blows
Identity: doesnt really matter
Preferred Pronoun Set: to me
Gotta be a fake. How embarrassing would it be for them to have the PW featured in all the hype videos, one of the power 5, be outshined by a 3 color sidekick PW in the same set?

_________________
Duels Decklists, updated 10/03/19

Yes I’m fine with killing women and children.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 12:53 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 8960
Location: Brazil
Gotta be a fake. How embarrassing would it be for them to have the PW featured in all the hype videos, one of the power 5, be outshined by a 3 color sidekick PW in the same set?


Like what happened with Jace and Nissa in the last two Sets?

_________________
Yes, I'm from Brazil and no, I'm not an annoying ****.

RPG characters


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 12:57 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 06, 2014
Posts: 11033
Identity: ItsreallyDJ0045
Preferred Pronoun Set: I'm male, lol!
felbatista wrote:
Gotta be a fake. How embarrassing would it be for them to have the PW featured in all the hype videos, one of the power 5, be outshined by a 3 color sidekick PW in the same set?


Like what happened with Jace and Nissa in the last two Sets?


Yeah, it's worth remembering that, for whatever reason, WotC believe that multiple color cards should be pushed more than mono colored ones.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 12:59 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 8960
Location: Brazil
DJ0045 wrote:
felbatista wrote:
Gotta be a fake. How embarrassing would it be for them to have the PW featured in all the hype videos, one of the power 5, be outshined by a 3 color sidekick PW in the same set?


Like what happened with Jace and Nissa in the last two Sets?


Yeah, it's worth remembering that, for whatever reason, WotC believe that multiple color cards should be pushed more than mono colored ones.


They believe that because it's the right thing to do. Multicolored cards should be more powerful than monocolored cards.

_________________
Yes, I'm from Brazil and no, I'm not an annoying ****.

RPG characters


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 1:00 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 26, 2015
Posts: 186
Identity: Lonely Card-Counter
Because it's 'easier' to play mono-color cards reliably? Kinda makes sense to me.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 1:12 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 23, 2015
Posts: 279
Identity: Male
I would use the fake Lili, but mostly for her -3 as a Barter in Blood. I, too, would be disappointed with this power level from someone called "the last hope."

_________________
Do you like D&D 5e? Do you cast spells? Consider this... http://www.dmsguild.com/product/238470/Spells-from-Elsewhere


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 1:14 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 28, 2015
Posts: 5102
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: uhhhhh
felbatista wrote:
DJ0045 wrote:
felbatista wrote:

Like what happened with Jace and Nissa in the last two Sets?


Yeah, it's worth remembering that, for whatever reason, WotC believe that multiple color cards should be pushed more than mono colored ones.


They believe that because it's the right thing to do. Multicolored cards should be more powerful than monocolored cards.

Well yeah. Tamiyo requires you to be Bant and basically nothing but Bant.

_________________
KLD Season King of the Hill Winner.
EMN Season King of the Hill Winner.

The one true King of NGA Magic Duels on Xbox One.

You want some? Come get some. You don't like me? Bite me.

Day 1,000 of the never-ending Vert monarchy.

viewtopic.php?f=38&t=16077

Magic's a simple game, 2 people take turns playing cards and in the end Divinevert wins 2-0...


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 1:17 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 06, 2014
Posts: 11033
Identity: ItsreallyDJ0045
Preferred Pronoun Set: I'm male, lol!
Sir_Shadow wrote:
Because it's 'easier' to play mono-color cards reliably? Kinda makes sense to me.


FWIW, I am not convinced that mono cards are easier to play. But multicolor cards do force specific color combinations, which may justify the added power. I can't do it right now, but I read a very interesting article on the subject a while back. The were talking about GG vs GW 2 drops, and why it was actually more difficult for a competitive deck to reliably cast GG cards (obviously or are easier to play than , but that's a false equivalence, you must compare to or ). Basically, they were going over the math, but I can summarize it here:

You need 20 G sources to run GG on t2 vs. 11 G and 11 W to run GW on t2. So on the surface it looks like the GG is slightly easier (it requires a 20 card commitment and the other requires 22). It isn't however, because say you run 4 GW dual lands, you know only need a total of 18 lands to meet the GW card's requirement (4+7+7=18). This would hold true even if you don't follow the hypergeometric distribution theories on how to build decks - and use some other method to build you mana bases, you'd still have some starting point and the dual lands would make GW cards easier than GG, or WW.

On top of that, the majority of the time you are going to run 2 or more colors, so the GG requirement is an even bigger deal, from the perspective of deck building. GG forces you into mono, or maybe dual color decks. GW is believable in 2, 3, and possibly even 4, or 5 color decks.

It gets even more obvious with a card that costs GGG, vs a card that costs GWU - just as an example.

I actually think WotC has it exactly backwards - but for the record the above is the entire reason I believe this to be the case, so if you don't buy into the logic, I unfortunately don't have much to add.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 1:23 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 8960
Location: Brazil
DJ0045 wrote:
Sir_Shadow wrote:
Because it's 'easier' to play mono-color cards reliably? Kinda makes sense to me.


FWIW, I am not convinced that mono cards are easier to play. But multicolor cards do force specific color combinations, which may justify the added power. I can't do it right now, but I read a very interesting article on the subject a while back. The were talking about GG vs GW 2 drops, and why it was actually more difficult for a competitive deck to reliably cast GG cards (obviously or are easier to play than , but that's a false equivalence, you must compare to or ). Basically, they were going over the math, but I can summarize it here:

You need 20 G sources to run GG on t2 vs. 11 G and 11 W to run GW on t2. So on the surface it looks like the GG is slightly easier (it requires a 20 card commitment and the other requires 22). It isn't however, because say you run 4 GW dual lands, you know only need a total of 18 lands to meet the GW card's requirement (4+7+7=18). This would hold true even if you don't follow the hypergeometric distribution theories on how to build decks - and use some other method to build you mana bases, you'd still have some starting point and the dual lands would make GW cards easier than GG, or WW.

On top of that, the majority of the time you are going to run 2 or more colors, so the GG requirement is an even bigger deal, from the perspective of deck building. GG forces you into mono, or maybe dual color decks. GW is believable in 2, 3, and possibly even 4, or 5 color decks.

It gets even more obvious with a card that costs GGG, vs a card that costs GWU - just as an example.

I actually think WotC has it exactly backwards - but for the record the above is the entire reason I believe this to be the case, so if you don't buy into the logic, I unfortunately don't have much to add.


When you say "monocolored cards", you're including cards that cost XC. We weren't talking about the same thing.

_________________
Yes, I'm from Brazil and no, I'm not an annoying ****.

RPG characters


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 1:25 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Mar 18, 2016
Posts: 5360
Location: Anyway the wind blows
Identity: doesnt really matter
Preferred Pronoun Set: to me
felbatista wrote:
Gotta be a fake. How embarrassing would it be for them to have the PW featured in all the hype videos, one of the power 5, be outshined by a 3 color sidekick PW in the same set?


Like what happened with Jace and Nissa in the last two Sets?


Lol, basically true. Although Big Jace in my eyes is better than this alleged Liliana who's supposed to save everyone from the eldrazi invasion.

_________________
Duels Decklists, updated 10/03/19

Yes I’m fine with killing women and children.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 1:26 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 06, 2014
Posts: 11033
Identity: ItsreallyDJ0045
Preferred Pronoun Set: I'm male, lol!
felbatista wrote:
DJ0045 wrote:
Sir_Shadow wrote:
Because it's 'easier' to play mono-color cards reliably? Kinda makes sense to me.


FWIW, I am not convinced that mono cards are easier to play. But multicolor cards do force specific color combinations, which may justify the added power. I can't do it right now, but I read a very interesting article on the subject a while back. The were talking about GG vs GW 2 drops, and why it was actually more difficult for a competitive deck to reliably cast GG cards (obviously or are easier to play than , but that's a false equivalence, you must compare to or ). Basically, they were going over the math, but I can summarize it here:

You need 20 G sources to run GG on t2 vs. 11 G and 11 W to run GW on t2. So on the surface it looks like the GG is slightly easier (it requires a 20 card commitment and the other requires 22). It isn't however, because say you run 4 GW dual lands, you know only need a total of 18 lands to meet the GW card's requirement (4+7+7=18). This would hold true even if you don't follow the hypergeometric distribution theories on how to build decks - and use some other method to build you mana bases, you'd still have some starting point and the dual lands would make GW cards easier than GG, or WW.

On top of that, the majority of the time you are going to run 2 or more colors, so the GG requirement is an even bigger deal, from the perspective of deck building. GG forces you into mono, or maybe dual color decks. GW is believable in 2, 3, and possibly even 4, or 5 color decks.

It gets even more obvious with a card that costs GGG, vs a card that costs GWU - just as an example.

I actually think WotC has it exactly backwards - but for the record the above is the entire reason I believe this to be the case, so if you don't buy into the logic, I unfortunately don't have much to add.


When you say "monocolored cards", you're including cards that cost XC. We weren't talking about the same thing.


I know, that's why I included the explanation. I wanted to make sure we were on the same page, because otherwise were talking cross purposes.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 1:30 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 8960
Location: Brazil
It's worth noting that WotC also pushes cards that cost XCC and such. Much like new Tamiyo couldn't cost 3U, Liliana of the Veil couldn't cost 2B.

_________________
Yes, I'm from Brazil and no, I'm not an annoying ****.

RPG characters


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 03, 2016 1:32 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 10, 2013
Posts: 3347
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: He
felbatista wrote:
Gotta be a fake. How embarrassing would it be for them to have the PW featured in all the hype videos, one of the power 5, be outshined by a 3 color sidekick PW in the same set?


Like what happened with Jace and Nissa in the last two Sets?

This Liliana is just a random pic on imgur though and I have no clue what source this is from. Reddit doesn't even care about it and there's no discussion about it being possible either.

The name and art are clearly correct but it seems like another random mock up put directly to imgur.

_________________
Cards have names?
Dunno about the cards but my twitch and youtube sure do: https://www.twitch.tv/wrightjustice and https://www.youtube.com/user/Wasomacosalo


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1835 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 ... 92  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group