You really think I give a about four votes?

vote:Fable

There's 5 and I still don't care. The argument never had anything to do with people voting for me it had to do with whether or not I could actually cause chaos within the game and I realized I couldn't at least not in the same way as Mylen.

Please read carefully.

I never said the argument had anything to do with how many votes you had. I said how you reacted (conceding the argument) was the direct result of attention/votes (<-- this is right here) on you.

@Fable
Tunneling implies KoD is ignoring other information to pursue you and you alone. That is not what KoD is doing.



The amusing and terrible conception of pseudo-randomly picking two people to vote for is hardly any better than any other system relying on random chance to pick lynch candidates.

Rubik has crazy conspiracy theories about me. Hardly the sort of person to trust as the game progresses. Though I will admit he's less important than Fable given the outright disrespect to the sanctity of the game with the attempted bribery, if you can call that measly pittance a bribe.

Day 1 being Day 1, there is likely not to be much going on besides people trying to avoid attention and people trying to figure out why each person is trying to avoid attention and make something of it, slap some feeling on there for good measure, and call it a reason to vote. Not counting my own disdain vote, though you can read into it differently if you so desire.

@KOD

What?

It had nothing to do with how many votes I have but it was because of my reaction...to how many votes I have.

What the actual ?

Nothing you're saying makes any sort of logical sense and this is most blatant case of straw pulling I've ever seen.

@Io

You have no idea how much I hate that you get to hide behind this.

Which part am I hiding behind?

You tell me who KoD has even glanced at this game besides me? KoD has gone after me from the games start and for you to say otherwise is you taking advantage of the situation so you can keep the spotlight off you.

I didn't say KoD wasn't going after you. He's just not ignoring other information to do so. He's not tunneled in, seeing you and only you.

You didn't answer my question. From the start of the game what other person has KoD looked at besides me? He voted me right after the game started that has kept on me the entire time for no other reason then "just because" and then found his arbitrary reason to justify it afterwards.

@Fable:

Perhaps if you read the posts carefully and followed the flow of events properly you'd be on the same page. Failing that, I can only explain as slowly as I can for you to get caught up. Beyond that, I got nothing for you other than to say you're being obtuse on purpose.

So, shall we try from the beginning?

I started this (more or less) by poking you by saying Myl is more chaotic than you. You contested that. I referenced you as support for what I declared (ex. you liking Myl's suggestion more, you saying you were waiting on others to get stuff going despite you saying you would do stuff). This is all encompasses the chaos argument wrt to you and Myl.

Turning the page (do keep up), we arrive at your concession post wherein you indirectly admit Myl is more chaotic than you. This particular post wraps up the argument wrt to Myl being more chaotic than you; however, I focus on this as it is uncharacteristic as far as I am concerned with your reckless style. Strictly speaking, you're playing safe (refer back to my post where I already covered this if you want to continue arguing about points I already covered). The mention of why you would do this encompasses the votes on you and a desire to diffuse the situation (as I have already covered).


TL;DR: In short, you're playing dumb on purpose.

io


Damn.

Savage.

Wrong.

You want to start from the beginning you start with your vote for me on page 3. You clearly intended to after me from the beginning and furthermore you only think it was uncharacteristic for me to concede that mylen beats me in terms of chaos because the only person I've ever been on a team with on here is you and we are ever ever going to agree on anything. I have no problem conceding points/ agreeing with a logical person of which you are not.

@Fable again:

And this is how I know you're making stuff up Fable. Let's get down to it shall we?

1. Concerning my pregame vote: The vote doesn't count. Cry less.

2. Concerning the actual start of the game: I mention this because it is important. Guess what my first post was after the game started? Not a vote on you. There's actually a flow of posts that lead up to me voting you, but I'll cover that in the next point.

3. Concerning my actual vote on you: This vote came about after CL voted you and I got in on it. You would do well to reacquaint yourself with those posts least you keep making stuff up (hey, I thought you didn't make stuff up?) during the course of this discussion.


Here's a short description to kind of refresh you (even though you'll probably make stuff up anyway):
- CL gave a reason to vote you citing your thoughts as suspect.
- I tell CL I'm behind him on this one and vote you.
- Prior to both of those votes, the beginnings of the argument wrt to who is more chaotic between you and Myl happens.
- Within my post where I voted you, I get into the argument fully by backing up what I stated. You'll notice it isn't only a "just because". Quite frankly, just because isn't even present (it likely appears much later -- I def remember writing those words to poke at you). And what a wonder poking you has done.

@Fable:

Sorry, but I already showed why what you just posted is wrong.

Nice try though.

If I were you, I'd rethink that reward for my lynch.

Because, and let's be honest, isn't not in the rules that you can't bribe people. And I do believe you're right about people wanting money. You just have to make it worth their while Fable.

You can't do that with a "measly pittance".

Damn double negative.

*it's not in the rules

So basically the first chance to vote for me you did and your using a stupid argument over chaos as your excuse. Any way you break it down it looks like you were planning to go after me from the beginning.
vote:KoD

I didn't want day 1 to be about this but I have no choice in the matter. Clearly we arn't going to make any progress until either me or KoD is dead.

Also yeah the sweepstakes is off. It would be much more rewarding to lynch you myself rather than offering a bounty.

I prefer to think of it as behavioral analysis when it comes to why I vote you, but opinions opinions.

Still think I'm playing it safe?

Do I think you're still playing it safe?

To be completely honest, since you're asking that you must be referring to what occurred previously (otherwise you wouldn't say still). Since what occurred previously is something that hasn't been discussed since then (other than this particular instance of asking if you're still playing it safe), I have to say yes. You are still playing it safe since you conceded the argument from back then.

If you're talking about something else, you'll need to be a bit more specific.