It is currently Sun Dec 01, 2024 6:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 888 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 45  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 8:24 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 7260

_________________
"Everything looks good when your opponent passes 4 turns in a row" -- rstnme
"Something that does not look good when your opponent does nothing is not a thing" -- me


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 8:32 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 09, 2013
Posts: 7454
Location: Mountain View
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him
Zenbitz wrote:

There's a third leak, too, of a land that taps for ◇: http://www.mtgsalvation.com/forums/magi ... comment=32

No one's identified the artwork as being from anywhere else, so that gives these some believability, although they are very bizarre.

The first popular theory was that ◇ can only be paid for with colorless mana, but the fact that a land produces it (instead of producing :1:) means it must be it's own thing.

_________________
if someone said this about me i'd make it my signature


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 9:14 pm 
Offline
YMtC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 14370
Seriously, yeah, WTF I WANT these to be fake, or something relatively explicable (like the "must be paid with colorless" theory) but... yeah.

I would say this could ruin magic, but looking carefully Wastes does not have a type (meaning it doesn't bring about the development hell of Barry's Land). I doubt Grey Diamond will be a legit 6th color, though. Probably more similar to what I wanted snow mana to be.

EDIT: Where I was going with that is that I would say that this has magic-ruining potential, but then I think DFCs had more threat and they turned out beyond fine.

_________________
"Enjoy your screams, Sarpadia - they will soon be muffled beneath snow and ice."

I have a blog. I review anime, and sometimes related media, with an analytical focus.

I'm a (self) published author now! You can find my books on Amazon in Paperback or ebook!
The Accursed, a standalone young adult fantasy adventure.
Witch Hunters, book one of a young adult Scifi-fantasy trilogy.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 17, 2015 9:39 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 06, 2013
Posts: 1413
I'm guessing it is similar to snow.

_________________
Obsessed with hexproof.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 1:29 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 2979
The first popular theory was that ◇ can only be paid for with colorless mana, but the fact that a land produces it (instead of producing :1:) means it must be it's own thing.


I don't think those are opposed at all. I think this is simply finally making a concrete distinction between "Colorless Mana" (which is something that can be produced) and "Generic Mana", which defines cost. That they were both represented by the same grey-circle number was an inconsistency, and it disallowed using "must be paid in colorless" in a cost without extra rules text on-card. Finally disassociating the two allows them to squish the inconsistency (one piece of iconography representing two distinct concepts) and opens the design space of must-be-paid-using-colorless costs.

I do think this will come with massive but trivial errata to past cards, much like the creation and eventual change of the tap symbol. Now, any cards that add colorless mana to your mana pool will use this symbol rather than , and the iconography will exclusively mean "Generic mana; this is a cost can be paid with one unit of any type of mana".

That's my expectation, anyway.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 1:52 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 09, 2013
Posts: 7454
Location: Mountain View
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him
Yeah, I'm accepting mark's theory as a real possibility at this point. I think it's either that or it's a (very parasitic) type of mana only used in this set.

One has the downside of causing errata for a somewhat common template used since Onslaught (and used in this block already), but the other has the downside of being really awkward game design.

There are a few cards that produce :4:, but nothing that would get too crazy-looking with the new symbol. The only real casualty of getting rid of "add :1:" is the infinity symbol on Mox Lotus, which will never get errata anyway. ):

_________________
if someone said this about me i'd make it my signature


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 4:10 pm 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15599
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
MAYBE THIS IS OBLIGATE COLORLESS MANA OR MAYBE IT IS ITS OWN THING

IT WOULD BE WEIRD IF IT WAS THE FORMER BUT ALSO IF IT WAS THE LATTER

this has been "razorborne accurately summarizes the last hundred posts in this subforum in all caps"

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 4:15 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: May 09, 2014
Posts: 4575
different mana type would be absurdly parasitic but still less parasitic than yugioh

_________________
"That winter, the fireplace was never without a crackling blaze in its belly. The boiled wine we drank was undoubtedly middling and cheap, but she said, with a smile, "I've never had wine this good before." And though I didn't say anything, I felt the same way."


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 18, 2015 4:17 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 09, 2013
Posts: 7454
Location: Mountain View
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him
In this thread: People are surprised that a set starring Kozilek is weird.

Ragnarokio wrote:
different mana type would be absurdly parasitic but still less parasitic than yugioh


I agree. Yu-Gi-Oh is by far the most parasitic Magic expansion. I tried to play it with other Magic sets and it didn't work at all!

_________________
if someone said this about me i'd make it my signature


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2015 8:46 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sep 24, 2013
Posts: 8786
Maro says "[Colorless mana matters is] a Kozilek thing. Ingest and Processors were an Ulamog thing."

Possibly implying the ingest mechanic won't be in OGW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 8:47 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '11
YMtC Pro Tour Champion
YMtC Idol Winner
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 10665
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/my/mine/himself
Kozilek confirmed for only pure eldrazi. btfo Ulamog harlots.

_________________
[Warchief] Custom EDH Project
you're like the kind of person who would cast Necropotence irl


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 12, 2015 10:11 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 2979
Did Emrakul mosey on over to Innistrad? Is the Shadow over Innistrad spaghetti-monster-shaped? Are we going from Victorian-era gothic horror in Innistrad to Lovecraftian horror?


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 2:47 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 10, 2015
Posts: 3569
Location: California
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
I think we will get a land in OGW at common that is identical to Darksteel Citadel except it isn't an artifact and that it swaps for

_________________
Is it just me, or does Bruse Tarl look like an 1890s Barnum circus strongman who'd hawk strength tonic patent medicines on the side?


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 5:12 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 7801
You mean Wastes?

_________________
magicpablo666 wrote:
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 23, 2015 6:32 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 10, 2015
Posts: 3569
Location: California
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
AzureShade wrote:
You mean Wastes?

I mean Wastes, but indestructible.

_________________
Is it just me, or does Bruse Tarl look like an 1890s Barnum circus strongman who'd hawk strength tonic patent medicines on the side?


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 3:53 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Nov 03, 2015
Posts: 44
Preferred Pronoun Set: she/her
I bet we will not get Snow-Covered Wastes, and that's a shame.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 1:57 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 303
Location: El Paso TX
Identity: she
rocketnia wrote:
I bet we will not get Snow-Covered Wastes, and that's a shame.



This.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 3:21 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sep 24, 2013
Posts: 8786
So far we haven't seen any of these mechanics in OGW

Landfall, Awaken, Converge, Rally, Ingest


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 5:25 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 4316
I'm hoping that at least one of them returns judging from maro's answer to your question( that I also tried asking , thank you for managing to get it answered).


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 5:51 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Sep 24, 2013
Posts: 8786
No problem. I assume that rally is gone, replaced with cohort. I assume ingest is gone cause this set is about Kozilek and that converge is gone cause it clashes with colorless, but Awaken and Landfall will return.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 888 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 ... 45  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group