It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 7:43 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2015 2:18 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Posts: 4649
Location: Alchemist's Refuge
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
So at FNM last night, a couple of questions cropped up that I wasn't sure the correct answer to, and neither did the TO (who is acting Head Judge and had me acting as Floor Judge). I'll include the ruling we went with for each question.


Question 1: If Anafenza, the Foremost blocks a Deathmist Raptor, and neither creature has first strike, will the Deathmist Raptor be exiled?
I ruled that Deathmist would be exiled, since both creatures leave the battlefield at the same time (so the logic is that Anafenza's replacement ability can still apply to the opponent's creature).

Question 2: Player A has only one enchantment, Silkwrap, which has exiled Player B's Avatar of the Resolute. Player B has only one creature without a counter on it, and casts Dromoka's Command choosing the modes "Target player sacrifices an enchantment" and "Put a +1/+1 counter on target creature" choosing Player A and his creature as the targets. Does the Avatar of the Resolute enter the battlefield with a +1/+1 counter on it?
Both I and the TO ruled that it didn't, because instructions are followed in order on Dromoka's Command. So the Silkwrap leaves the battlefield, which returns the Avatar to the battlefield immediately after it gets sacrificed (since the exile has a duration, and that duration ended). Which would be before the +1/+1 counter is placed on the creature that didn't have a counter already on it.

Were these rulings correct?

_________________
Former Rules Advisor (RA program ended 5-3-16)

Up High, Down Low, Whoops, Too Slow.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2015 2:43 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 07, 2015
Posts: 312
Your rulings were correct.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2015 2:59 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 09, 2013
Posts: 7454
Location: Mountain View
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him
Edacade wrote:
Question 1: If Anafenza, the Foremost blocks a Deathmist Raptor, and neither creature has first strike, will the Deathmist Raptor be exiled?
I ruled that Deathmist would be exiled, since both creatures leave the battlefield at the same time (so the logic is that Anafenza's replacement ability can still apply to the opponent's creature).

Deathmist Raptor will not be exiled, but only because Anafenza's ability says "from anywhere."

Comprehensive Rules wrote:
603.6c Leaves-the-battlefield abilities trigger when a permanent moves from the battlefield to another zone, or when a phased-in permanent leaves the game because its owner leaves the game. These are written as, but aren’t limited to, “When [this object] leaves the battlefield, . . .” or “Whenever [something] is put into a graveyard from the battlefield, . . . .” An ability that attempts to do something to the card that left the battlefield checks for it only in the first zone that it went to. An ability that triggers when a card is put into a certain zone “from anywhere” is never treated as a leaves-the-battlefield ability, even if an object is put into that zone from the battlefield.

603.6d Normally, objects that exist immediately after an event are checked to see if the event matched any trigger conditions. Continuous effects that exist at that time are used to determine what the trigger conditions are and what the objects involved in the event look like. However, some triggered abilities must be treated specially. Leaves-the-battlefield abilities, abilities that trigger when a card leaves a graveyard, abilities that trigger when a permanent phases out, abilities that trigger when an object that all players can see is put into a hand or library, abilities that trigger specifically when an object becomes unattached, abilities that trigger when a player loses control of an object, and abilities that trigger when a player planeswalks away from a plane will trigger based on their existence, and the appearance of objects, prior to the event rather than afterward. The game has to “look back in time” to determine if these abilities trigger.
Example: Two creatures are on the battlefield along with an artifact that has the ability “Whenever a creature dies, you gain 1 life.” Someone plays a spell that destroys all artifacts, creatures, and enchantments. The artifact’s ability triggers twice, even though the artifact goes to its owner’s graveyard at the same time as the creatures.

When we check if anything triggered, Anafenza is already in your graveyard, and we don't get to look back in time, since her ability isn't a leaves-the-battlefield ability.
Your ruling was correct.

Edacade wrote:
Question 2: Player A has only one enchantment, Silkwrap, which has exiled Player B's Avatar of the Resolute. Player B has only one creature without a counter on it, and casts Dromoka's Command choosing the modes "Target player sacrifices an enchantment" and "Put a +1/+1 counter on target creature" choosing Player A and his creature as the targets. Does the Avatar of the Resolute enter the battlefield with a +1/+1 counter on it?
Both I and the TO ruled that it didn't, because instructions are followed in order on Dromoka's Command. So the Silkwrap leaves the battlefield, which returns the Avatar to the battlefield immediately after it gets sacrificed (since the exile has a duration, and that duration ended). Which would be before the +1/+1 counter is placed on the creature that didn't have a counter already on it.

Your ruling here is correct. Unlike the old Oblivion Ring triggers, the creature exiled by Silk Wrap returns immediately, while Dromoka's Command is still resolving.

_________________
if someone said this about me i'd make it my signature


Last edited by CommanderJim on Sat Dec 05, 2015 3:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2015 3:16 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Posts: 4649
Location: Alchemist's Refuge
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
adeyke wrote:
Your rulings were correct.


Ok, I can rest easier knowing I didn't fudge up a couple of games. Thanks.

Deathmist Raptor will not be exiled, but only because Anafenza's ability says "from anywhere."

Comprehensive Rules wrote:
603.6c Leaves-the-battlefield abilities trigger when a permanent moves from the battlefield to another zone, or when a phased-in permanent leaves the game because its owner leaves the game. These are written as, but aren’t limited to, “When [this object] leaves the battlefield, . . .” or “Whenever [something] is put into a graveyard from the battlefield, . . . .” An ability that attempts to do something to the card that left the battlefield checks for it only in the first zone that it went to. An ability that triggers when a card is put into a certain zone “from anywhere” is never treated as a leaves-the-battlefield ability, even if an object is put into that zone from the battlefield.

603.6d Normally, objects that exist immediately after an event are checked to see if the event matched any trigger conditions. Continuous effects that exist at that time are used to determine what the trigger conditions are and what the objects involved in the event look like. However, some triggered abilities must be treated specially. Leaves-the-battlefield abilities, abilities that trigger when a card leaves a graveyard, abilities that trigger when a permanent phases out, abilities that trigger when an object that all players can see is put into a hand or library, abilities that trigger specifically when an object becomes unattached, abilities that trigger when a player loses control of an object, and abilities that trigger when a player planeswalks away from a plane will trigger based on their existence, and the appearance of objects, prior to the event rather than afterward. The game has to “look back in time” to determine if these abilities trigger.
Example: Two creatures are on the battlefield along with an artifact that has the ability “Whenever a creature dies, you gain 1 life.” Someone plays a spell that destroys all artifacts, creatures, and enchantments. The artifact’s ability triggers twice, even though the artifact goes to its owner’s graveyard at the same time as the creatures.

When we check if anything triggered, Anafenza is already in your graveyard, and we don't get to look back in time, since her ability isn't a leaves-the-battlefield ability.


Forgive me if I ignore your insight on Question 1. Anafenza's second ability isn't a triggered ability (doesn't begin with the words "When," "Whenever," or "At" ), and thus doesn't follow the rules you've quoted. :P It's a static ability which generates a replacement effect. But nothing under entry 614 was really clear about whether a creature with a replacement effect dying at the same time the event described was trying to happen allowed it to be replaced.

Edit: Although, based on your quotes, this is probably the one you'd say applies:
Comp Rules wrote:
614.4. Replacement effects must exist before the appropriate event occurs—they can’t “go back in
time” and change something that’s already happened. Spells or abilities that generate these effects
are often cast or activated in response to whatever would produce the event and thus resolve before
that event would occur.


So if my ruling was correct like adeyke says, then that means that Anafenza's ability does exist prior to the event "creatures are destroyed due to lethal combat damage." And thus replaces the event "Deathmist Raptor is destroyed (moved from the battlefield to its owner's graveyard) for having damage equal to or greater than its toughness marked on it" with "Deathmist Raptor is exiled for having damage equal to or greater than its toughness marked on it."

Edit2: Correcting my poor wording of state-based actions.

_________________
Former Rules Advisor (RA program ended 5-3-16)

Up High, Down Low, Whoops, Too Slow.


Last edited by Edacade on Sat Dec 05, 2015 3:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 05, 2015 3:39 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 09, 2013
Posts: 7454
Location: Mountain View
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him
Whoops! Yeah, your ruling was correct. I saw "from anywhere" and immediately thought of Profane Memento without realizing Anafenza has a replacement effect, not a trigger.

_________________
if someone said this about me i'd make it my signature


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group