Yeah, I don't get it. I'm used to having my face stomped in by meta netdecks. Secret Paladin, Dragon Priest, and most Face Hunters destroy me. Of the "top decks", Patron was the one I could actually beat, and generally had the most fun playing against even if I lost. Surely it wasn't somehow the most powerful and dominant of the lot? Likely, it was simply the one that had an easy kill switch.
But then, if long-term problems punctuated by random and arbitrary nerfs and buffs that often fail to address the actual issue wasn't the order of the day, it wouldn't be Blizzard. I love the company most of the time, but they balance games by the
Look at me, I'm the DCI methodology.
The reasons the decks you listed stomped your decks is because they are burn and tempo decks, which heavily punish you for not maximizing every turn. Secret Paladin and Dragon Priest just have an insane curve, and Face Hunter puts you on a hard clock unless you have heals and taunts.
Patron is the best deck for a few reasons.
It is a combo deck that's combo activator is
Whirlwind effects, all it has to do to do decently against aggro is play
Armorsmith. Aggro decks are supposed to punish control decks, and the way Patron plays makes that much harder. It would be like if the best combo deck in MTG's combo relied on playing
Lightning Helix and cards similar to it.
It is consistent.
Battle Rage is a pretty abusable, and
Acolyte of Pain is just as natural of a fit as Armorsmith. It also is filled with
Grim Patron activators and doesn't necessarily need all its combo pieces to win.
Warrior just has some of the best tools for controlling the board, two great weapons and
Execute.