I picked garren for my partner on this mission because he voted yes every time.

Sorry for no formatting, but I'm at work.

Zinger2099 and Garren_Windspear both voted YES.

Mission 1: Success

Leadership passes to Mown

round|nominator|team|Garren|Mown|Neo|Nik|Raz|Rubik|Zinger||Go?|Fails
1.1|Garren|Garren, Raz|{color=green}yes|{color=red}no|{color=red}no|{color=green}yes|{color=green}yes|{color=red}no|{color=red}no||{color=red}no|NA
1.2|Neo|Neo, Mown|{color=green}yes|{color=red}no|{color=green}yes|{color=red}no|{color=green}yes|{color=red}no|{color=red}no||{color=red}no|NA
1.3|Nik|Nik, Neo|{color=green}yes|{color=red}no|{color=green}yes|{color=red}no|{color=green}yes|{color=red}no|{color=red}no||{color=red}no|NA
1.4|Zinger|Zinger, Garren|{color=green}yes|{color=red}no|{color=red}no|{color=green}yes|{color=green}yes|{color=red}no|{color=green}yes||{color=yellow}yes|{color=green}0

made a slight formatting change but not allowed to edit so had to repost.

EBWoP: Three people are needed for Mission 2.

That empty column is bugging the hell out of me.
Well, gut instinct is to invite Garren and Zinger, but I'll take a moment to see if I have any reason to think otherwise.

I put it in as a visual divider between the votes and the results. they were running together which made it harder to quickly scan for information.

Pick me!

So, I guess the vote patterns are either "yes man", "no thanks" or "how2sendpm", which gives me relatively little to work with. Guess we're going with the "these people didn't destroy the first one" route, even though I hold little faith in the actual result.

I can't think of a better pick than Zinger and Garren, but I'm not sure I trust Mown. if I trusted the round 1 result more then I'd probably approve this on the grounds that a fail would confirm Mownscum, but since there's a decent chance that Zingscum or Garrenscum would let mission 1 pass anyway I don't think that's really a good call, so I'm probably gonna vote no but we'll see.

Mission 2

Proposal 1

Leader: Mown

Team: Mown, Zinger2099, Garren_Windspear

There's 48 hours remaining in this voting period.

Imma wait to send my vote for a bit in case Mown wants to try to convince me to trust them

Trust me.

7 people, 2 spies.
3 on this mission, knowing my status, I know there are 2 spies in the remaining 6 player (not including myself). The odds on a spy being on this mission are high, since I'm not on it.
Going to have to vote no.

That's incredibly poor logic. I assume you are to vote no to every mission that you are not on then? Actually mathematically speaking you should vote no for every mission ever because the odds of there being a spy on it are always high.

there are 3 spies

it's pretty sound logic. from a town perspective, given random selection, there is a 5% chance that a mission you're not on as town is scum-free, whereas if you're on it there's a 20% chance. that's 4 times more likely. you should always be much more likely to vote yes to teams you're on.

that said, this isn't random selection. while Zinger and Garren are by no means confirmed town, they did pass the last mission, which says something. while that doesn't necessarily mean you should vote yes, it should be something that factors into your consideration. so, by the way, should this overreaction by Garren, which I'm filing away for later consideration and which is making me less comfortable with this mission than I already was. was leaning no, but I'm gonna go ahead and commit now.

I apologize again for my absence. I am doing my best to at least stay up to date on the game and send the MOD the required PMs. I will hopefully be replacing my lost phone in the next couple days. Fingers crossed.

Also also, a team involving me and garren + any third party seems a good idea to me.

There are about 24 hours remaining in this voting period, and I have six of seven votes in.

The spies are multiplying! Watch out.

No, I'm not going to do that for a long time. But right now, with 0 information, I know that any team that does not include me is more likely to have a spy on it. Until we get more info (which might have to be a failed mission) I'd prefer to play the odds, and hold out for what seems to me to be a better team.