Nobody replied to this and kept on having the fight as thought there was a fight to be fought:
I'm okay with 3CM being moved back into Magic General at this point because I would rather have people posting even if it's slightly off topic. It's still related to Magic anyway. Let's give it a go in General because if the thread dies, it wasn't meant to be anyway. I don't know if 3cm would be better off with a fresh start or moving the thread over. But let's be flexible and try different things.
Huzzah! Thanks, Slobad!
Now, the real reason I came to post here is to say that I am starting a new season, hopefully this weekend. So if you're looking for data about the effects of starting a new thread, just wait and watch for a couple of weeks, and you'll have it, for better or for worse.
Huzzah #2! I assume my trophy is at the engravers as we speak?
Just wanted to make sure you saw the above quote, so you know to launch the new season in General.
Um....... after spending most of the last two hours trying to figure out how to do this game and how to join, I have decided the barrier to entry for people who have not played this before is high enough that I am hopelessly confused at this point in time. Thus, I have an honest suggestion here.
It is a high barrier to entry, just like one's first GP (which I used a flimsy excuse to back out of last fall) or one's first FNM or pre-release. Everything looks scarier before you try it the first time. Hell, I've only just overcome my trepidation about joining the MTGS big league, that makes this board's game look positively house league. I was among those who floated the concept of a reset in the round 20s but at the time, it was a concern that the disruption could be more destructive than the fresh start. While we'll never know if it really would have been, we do know that status quo didn't work. Still unclear if a reboot at that time would have actually thrived.
1) Vanilla 3CM
2) Alternate Formats
3) Possibly a thread for questions and in-depth information
You guys may be used to it, but bluntly put I need to play multiple games of vanilla 3CM in a row before I would ever even consider trying the alternate formats, just so I could get the hang of the game.
It may sound strange, but in fact alt rounds are more new-player-friendly than vanilla. In vanilla, there's a whole lot of tacit knowledge in the loooong-existing meta that only slightly changes with the banlist. There will be a distinct advantage to the players who know all the expected threats because they've seen it all before. An interesting alt round rule puts players on a more level footing because they're all working with an unknown meta. When I was a fledgling at these games I had far more success with alt rounds than vanilla because of this - at alt, I might bring a viable deck they never saw coming. In vanilla, if a deck was truly viable, odds are they've seen a flavor of it before, unless it involves a brand-new just-released card.
3) A thread to post and get some questions answered. Some extension of the primer so that people can learn a little bit of your meta, why some cards are currently banned, why cards were banned in the past, and basically just ask any questions they might have about 3CM in general. Basically, something to look at before jumping in what, at this point in time, looks like a pretty **** intimidating shark tank here.
I agree that an info and discussion thread would be of value. A few people (myself included) have tried writing more detailed primers but never actually reached a publishable state - there's an inherent problem that there's actually so much information one could present, one reaches the point where the wall of text becomes oppressive before the point at which the writer is satisfied that there are no glaring omissions.
When things go live this weekend I will try to have a summary of why the 'usual suspects' are initially banned (CJ, send me your planned initial banlist so I can do some prework on this; I expect it'll be pretty close to the current alt banlist?). As for later bans though - in the most recent season, the banlist mutated simply because top and bottom finishers were allowed to choose new bans and unbans as part of the keeping the meta from being entirely static - but there was no 'reasoning' provided that would make sense to new players any more than "That card was in a top deck once, it was banned because a low finisher had to choose a card from that deck to ban, and nobody's gotten around to using their unban privilege on it yet".
This is all very constructive, and I look forward to fielding any further questions about the format. After all, by the time this upcoming season launches, I will be the reigning champion.