ParadOxymoron-That's a lot of inevitabily on a uncommon bear.

altimis-I don't think aggro cares that much about his own life total unless this set limited decks are very aggressive.

Cato-I don't think that the narrow upside of sometime counting as a 9/9 outweighs the tales about making it have its printed stats in a limited tournament, i don't think that:don't play lands is something an uncommon should say.

Hello World-because counting each permanent each turn and have that number always in mind when choosing what to cast is not taxing at all for the players, amirite?
/sarcasm.

Arqwart-probably too complicated for uncommon.

Shazzeh-3 is a big number for an uncommon sweeper, but has been done before.

vega-those things usually cost more whan you don't need a specific set of cards to trigger them or can be triggered repeatetly by the same card.

TPzombie-Having only a creature with 1 power as the only creature in play seems weird, I guess it's a better goblin electromancer for storm if they reach the mana cost?Games were your opponent is sitting behind a 1/3 while negating everything and occasionally trowing an ember shot or a scorching spearat you while pinging you for 1 every turn sounds miserable.

Confused-the drawback is backbreaking mostly in limited, It could work as an uncommon as a 6/6.

Stein-I guess you could do this with the gruuls in gatecrash, but the effect feels better on a rare.

LilyStorm-I'm not sure this as a uncommon is a good idea.Feels more like a rare.