[quote=Bounty Hunter]
The only thing that the interstate system has to do with missiles is that when it comes to the vertical clearance of bridges and such. Originally the clearance was set at 14 feet which was sufficient for all military vehicles and equipment to safely travel under but after the launching of Sputnik that number was changed to 17 feet to allow for movement of things like the Atlas intercontinental ballistic missile which could not be transported via the rail network.
Rather than continuing to spread rumor and old wives tales gang, lets actually stick to linking facts! Or at least fact check something before simply copy/pasting it from some random site.
For more information on the Eisenhower Interstate System refer to the following:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/interstate/faq.htmhttp://www.fhwa.dot.gov/interstate/interstatemyths.htmhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interstate_Highway_Systemhttp://www.history.com/topics/interstate-highway-system[/quote]
In my defense, I knew it had something to do with missiles and I was partly right
President Eisenhower supported the Interstate System because he wanted a way of evacuating cities if the United States was attacked by an atomic bomb.
President Eisenhower’s support was based largely on civilian needs—support for economic development, improved highway safety, and congestion relief, as well as reduction of motor vehicle-related lawsuits. He understood the military value of the Interstate System, as well as its use in evacuations, but they were only part of the reason for his support.
But thanks for the links
as I was false in part but not all so i get half credit
__
Random fact about msyelf: I have a small interest in WW3/Cold War/Cuban missile Crisis and related fields.