As for the logic. There is no incredibly great flaws. I targeted you at random. I didn't like how you responded. That's all. It's what every town does it during day one. Completely random. I also didn't like how Cereal_Killer and you were interacting; and not simply for the fact that you were both against me (I have my own policy against revenge lynching), and that didn't help your case in my book.

As for which lynch would have been better, it's strictly logical. Statistics. Certainly, during day one all the numbers are gonna suck, and I pointed that out. Unfortunately, nobody likes bluntness in mafia; not that anybody trusts anybody else anyways. And you are misinterpretting my use of active. I'm not talking about active (posting a lot) versus inactive (not posting a lot). I'm talking about active (doing something) versus reactive (following others).

Now in my example, obviously a rock isn't going to post anything, but that was an exaggeration for effect. There's a difference between posting something of value, and posting things to look like your posting value. We brought this up against Confused at one point. It's not that reactive is bad, but if that's all you do then that's when it's bad.