It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 7:44 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:43 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 12, 2014
Posts: 84
So I was looking through some books at some of the modules I might want to try playing and I saw a few enemies that had dash in place of where their defense would be. What does that mean?

Does that mean that they simply cannot be attacked by attacks versus that defense, or that any attack against that defense hits?


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:06 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 393
Could you give a bit more information?

Which module and which creature? I'm pretty sure I think you're talking about attacking objects or traps.

_________________
They say my bark is worse than my bite. I wonder what that means.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 5:54 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 7305
Location: England
I have to admit I'm curious about this as well. I know 4E did away with things like constructs and undead not having Fortitude/Will scores so I can't think of a reason why a creature would not have these defenses.

I thought the same as Oakenheart as well but after checking the DMG traps don't have defenses at all so I've got no idea. Your going to have to give us the specific example here. Colour me intrigued.

_________________
Welcome! I'm Garren and I'll be your designated villain for the evening.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:30 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 12, 2014
Posts: 84
I was glancing through Keep on the Shadowfell module since so many people keep mentioning it here and theres a room in there with some statues in it. Theres one big titan statue and two smaller dragon statues and none of them have any numbers beside with and fortitude. I get that a statue shouldnt have a will so I was thinking that, but why not a fortitude? And why would it have a reflex then?


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:50 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 10342
Preferred Pronoun Set: BH/B.H./Bounty Hunter
Hey, we just had the same question come up in our game. Dont know if you were watching the twitch stream when we were talking about it.

The room in question is Area 16 : Chamber of Statues in Keep on the Shadowfell which is down on the second level of the keep. Here's the stat blocks for the baddies :

Image

Dont mind the crummy MS Paint cropping job. I searched around online and didnt find too much from googling various keywords (though I did find several pages complaining about how broken this fight is and how it should be better planned out) so I figured I'd start sifting through both the KotS quick start rules and the Dungeon Master's Guide and finally came upon the answer...I think.

Quote:
Dungeon Masters Guide : Page 66
Damaging Objects
Like characters, objects have hit points and defense scores (except for Will defense; see Object Immunities and Vulnerabilities, below).
An object’s AC, Fortitude, and Reflex defense depend entirely on its size. (As you can tell from the following table, it’s pretty easy to hit an object; so easy, in fact, that many DMs just skip the attack roll unless the situation is particularly dramatic.) An object’s hit point total generally depends on two factors: its size and its material. As a rule, larger or thicker objects have more hit points than smaller or thinner ones. Objects made of stone or metal have more hit points than those made of wood or glass.
Exceptions to this general rule abound. An object that’s big but full of delicate moving parts might have fewer hit points than a smaller, more solid object, because it doesn't take as much damage to render that object functionally useless.

Object Immunities and Vulnerabilities
Usually, it doesn’t matter what kind of attack you make against an object: Damage is damage. However, there are a few exceptions.
All objects are immune to poison damage, psychic damage, and necrotic damage.
Objects don’t have a Will defense and are immune to attacks that target Will defense. Some unusual materials might be particularly resistant to some or all kinds of damage. In addition, you might rule that some kinds of damage are particularly effective against certain objects and grant the object vulnerability to that damage type. For example, a gauzy curtain or a pile of dry papers might have vulnerability 5 to fire because any spark is likely to destroy it.


This leads me to believe that the bad guys that have a dash rather than a defense simply cannot be attacked at all by attacks that versus that defense. I cannot however answer why statues have a reflex.

_________________
"Life is like a Dungeon Master, if it smiles at you something terrible is probably about to happen."

Play-By-Post Games
Phandelver : IC / OC / Map


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 6:51 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 7305
Location: England
Ah Keep on the Shadowfell. That pretty much explains it. KotS was actually written as a module *before* the core rulebooks. Because of this there are a decent number of little discrepancies between what is presented in that module and how the rules as a whole work. I'd assume then that at some point in development Constructs would have been immune to attacks targeting Will and Fortitude but this was dropped before the rulebooks hit shelves. The '-' through the defenses is most likely an artifact of this. KotS actually has a few of these little issues come up - a big one being just how insanely tough Ironfang (I think that's his name - the Goblin chieftain) is compared to monster that would appear in the MM.

Edit - or what Bounty Hunter said.

_________________
Welcome! I'm Garren and I'll be your designated villain for the evening.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 7:24 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 10342
Preferred Pronoun Set: BH/B.H./Bounty Hunter
From what I can tell, all of the stuff Garren just said. KotS doesnt seem to balance well with ...most of 4e...and is full of little things that go against how the rules currently work. Theres several places that should have suprise rounds that dont, or vice versa and the enemies arent really balanced for a level one module. Some fights are a breeze and not even a challenge and others like Irontooth arent fair to the party at all.

Irontooth killed my entire Play-By-Post group (except the one guy who ran away) without even getting to his bloodied value.

Edit : We just ran into another issue, Kalrel has an note next to his AC for something called Shadow Form but nothing on his card saying what it is...turns out it just doesnt exist, per WotC customer support.

http://wizards.custhelp.com/app/answers ... shadowfell

Check out this page for more.

_________________
"Life is like a Dungeon Master, if it smiles at you something terrible is probably about to happen."

Play-By-Post Games
Phandelver : IC / OC / Map


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 7:52 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 7305
Location: England
For completeness sake the reason why your statues have a Reflex save is entirely a balance reason. Depending on build and load out it is perfectly possible for dedicated spellcasters (Warlocks and Wizards specifically) to enter such an encounter without packing a single attack that targets AC (although admittedly unlikely). As such at least one other defense had to be a viable target and Reflex was the least ridiculous option (although still pretty ridiculous).

_________________
Welcome! I'm Garren and I'll be your designated villain for the evening.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 8:17 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 10342
Preferred Pronoun Set: BH/B.H./Bounty Hunter
I dunno man, I think a statue would have a high amount of Fortitude be resistant to things like poison and the like. The warlock I'm playing in my Red Box play by post game doesnt attack AC like you mentioned 90% of my spells target reflex and an odd one or two go for Will.

_________________
"Life is like a Dungeon Master, if it smiles at you something terrible is probably about to happen."

Play-By-Post Games
Phandelver : IC / OC / Map


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 8:17 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 5149
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Identity: Spider-Man
Preferred Pronoun Set: Wtf is a "Jabber address"?
As a seasoned 4e DM (been running it since it was released) I can tell you that if something or someone is "lacking" in a defence score it is because they are immune to attacks of that nature.

THAT BEING SAID, what Garren said about KotS containing out-of-date rules applies here.

Off the top of my head, objects and vehicles (which function a lot like monsters sometimes) don't have a will defence because they can't be targeted with such attacks. I'm sure there are probably monsters as well that have that quality, but I'm too lazy to check right now.

_________________
well played zinger


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:12 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 06, 2014
Posts: 62
What Bounty Hunter said. Enemies or objects that have no score for a particular defense simply cannot be attacked by powers that target that defense.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group