Lynching Silly now is a terrible idea and you all know that, yet you're trying to do it anyway.
Now this is just pure conjecture. Exactly why is lynching Silly a terrible idea? Is Silly our doctor? Are they contributing significant amounts of information to help us discover the identity of the goblins? If I'm missing something please tell me but from what I can see nothing they have done has exactly said 'I'm not a goblin' anymore than anyone else. Who would you say we lynch?
Killing Silly gives zero information beyond his alignment, a info we get no matter who we lynch. Pretty much everyone that is talking regularly is a better target for the lynch, since this gives us way more info. Me, you, anyone. Heck, I even gave you a reason to lynch me some posts ago. I don't even know why you're asking me who do I think we should lynch, since I already casted me vote. From my viewpoint, both C_K and Neo are better candidates, since they are my top suspects, but anyone talking is better than someone not talking. Let Mafia kill them, it's what they want anyway.
We have no more reason to kill him than we have to kill Confused or Squinty or rstnme.
No offense meant but as far as an argument against a random killing goes pointing at other people and saying 'why not kill them' isn't exactly a stellar argument. Can you give me a reason to want to kill confused/Squinty or rstnme more than Silly? I see no reason to change my vote otherwise.
I can't, and that's exactly the point. The only reason people are giving to lynch Silly is because he isn't posting (which is a terrible reason by itself). But the truth is that neither Confused or Squinty or rstnme are contributing much to the conversation too. Why differentiate the treatment? Why Silly is better than any of them?
As a said, none of them are good targets for the lynch. No info kills are what Mafia wants, and that's why I'm looking at Neo, since he tried that twice now.