Why are we limiting people by color? If someone wants to make a 5 color zombie deck... I say let them. I'm really not liking the color restrictions in these contests, I think they hinder creativity.
I explained my point of view when i created this contest. The idea of the contest is a challenge for deckbuilders to create a deck under some restriction, in a way that they are comparable so that we can at least in theory optimize an archetype. My original idea was to have fixed colors every round, but now i'm giving some freedom when we have more restrictive themes.
It's only partially a creativity contest but mostly an optimized archetype contest, even if i'm aware that it would require more effort and a different way to evaluate them rather than the poll. For completely free creativity there is the entire constructed subforum.
Maybe should be assumed, but to be sure... are embalm creatures legal as they would create "zombie tokens" from the gy?
Yeah they do.
I get the point, but I think color restrictions are uninteresting and bad. Other types of restrictions are far more fun (and you've already had multiple people wanting non esper zombies). Do you actually have a reason for not changing the rules other than saving face?
Edit: Ok, that came out really salty. Sorry, I have a headache this morning. I appreciate you hosting the contest, I just thought last round was a bit too homogeneous and color restrictions contribute to that. I'd really like to see people accomplishing similar goals in very different ways and I think eliminating color restrictions will help and make these contests more fun.
Np, luckily i'm not able to draw and make comics, so i can accept also salty feedbacks
The contest should be homogeneus, we should have people discussing about changes on the same idea, if we take as example the last poll i liked a lot people discussing about the amount of lands with huge differences (19 lands/ 25 lands) between decks that can be called rakdos aggro, and also about specific choices like Key to the City, Glorybringer, etc. If a person or one of the deckbuilders tests all these decks he can see how a card underperforms or is a brilliant idea.
If we have no restrictions we can have let's say monoblack aggro, azorius embalm tokens, jund zombies. What would be the discussion by putting them all together? Only "hey your idea is cool", "this deck is sweet or sucks", but no comparison and no way to improve everyone's lists and decide which performed better. We are not looking for the sweetest idea, it should already be on the subforum somewhere, but taking one idea and trying to improve and optimize it.
Now you can tell me that my themes suck, or that testing 10 similar decklists can be boring, i can accept it. As for the themes, i try to differentiate them, mostly jank, but also something related to the actual expansion and also spike. As for the decklists i always felt that 6/7 decklists were a good amount, but if people send me lists i cannot say "you're too late, optimized too much your list but we are already 7". Again i'm not monopolizing the subforum, there are threads with sweet ideas and long discussions, but without being homogeneous there is no need to compare stuff and make a contest.
Edit: also you can tell me that the way to test them is not a good way and i agree, as i was discussing yesterday with Gem, but it's not easy to find a right method and keep it enjoyable for anyone who wanna join it. It's up to people to find a way to test them, feel how the differences behave and create a discussion with the deckbuilders.