imagine a card that said "you may put a land card from your hand onto the battlefield untapped." would that work the way I want it to with elfhame palace?
| No Goblins Allowed http://862838.jrbdt8wd.asia/ |
|
| theoretical wording question http://862838.jrbdt8wd.asia/viewtopic.php?f=56&t=19851 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | razorborne [ Sun Oct 08, 2017 8:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | theoretical wording question |
imagine a card that said "you may put a land card from your hand onto the battlefield untapped." would that work the way I want it to with elfhame palace?
|
|
| Author: | adeyke [ Sun Oct 08, 2017 9:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: theoretical wording question |
No. The Palace is entering the battlefield, so its replacement effect would apply. |
|
| Author: | razorborne [ Sun Oct 08, 2017 9:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: theoretical wording question |
adeyke wrote: No. The Palace is entering the battlefield, so its replacement effect would apply. unfortunate. how about "Lands you control enter the battlefield untapped."? never mind I just reinvented amulet of vigor
|
|
| Author: | Aaarrrgh [ Mon Oct 09, 2017 2:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: theoretical wording question |
I was going to suggest "put a land card onto the battlefield and untap it", but then you could combine it with anything that triggers of of lands entering the battlefield (like any landfall ability) to tap a land that normally enters untapped twice, couldn't you? |
|
| Author: | razorborne [ Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: theoretical wording question |
Aaarrrgh wrote: I was going to suggest "put a land card onto the battlefield and untap it", but then you could combine it with anything that triggers of of lands entering the battlefield (like any landfall ability) to tap a land that normally enters untapped twice, couldn't you? nah, triggers don't go on the stack until the current effect finishes resolving. that'd work.
|
|
| Author: | Aaarrrgh [ Mon Oct 09, 2017 3:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: theoretical wording question |
Right. Well, then I suggest that wording for your hypothetical card. You're welcome. |
|
| Author: | rocketnia [ Thu Nov 16, 2017 6:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: theoretical wording question |
I realize this is a pretty old thread, but here's my approach to making this work: If a land you control would enter the battlefield tapped, it enters untapped instead.
You may put a land card from your hand onto the battlefield. If it would enter the battlefield tapped, it enters untapped instead. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|