It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 8:01 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Backing up?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:33 am 
Offline
YMtC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Oct 17, 2013
Posts: 3486
Preferred Pronoun Set: He
At... lets say Professional REL, can you declare you are going to cast Fireball for 3 targeting your opponent's face, and then decide to take it back before you tap your mana for it (You have 4 untapped mountains)?

_________________
The cake is a differential manifold with group structure.
Knife Life


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rules Q&A
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:40 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15598
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
Dr_Demento wrote:
At... lets say Professional REL, can you declare you are going to cast Fireball for 3 targeting your opponent's face, and then decide to take it back before you tap your mana for it (You have 4 untapped mountains)?

if this is in relation to the thing in YMtC, I'm not sure the answer applies because there can be no strategic benefit in doing so here. maybe you could draw some parallels in a case where you declare it and, before choosing targets, your opponent shows you a counterspell from their hand, introducing new information, but then that's still different because it's non-mechanical information and one could argue that your opponent had a reasonable expectation that you were going to finish casting the spell you'd announced.

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Rules Q&A
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:47 am 
Offline
YMtC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Oct 17, 2013
Posts: 3486
Preferred Pronoun Set: He
Well, that is actually on your opponent for out-of-order sequencing (I think, I vaguely remember similar scenarios being described to explain... something, maybe backing up the game?). Regardless, even if it isn't a one-to-one correspondence, I figure the answer and reasoning behind it will be at least tangentially useful.

_________________
The cake is a differential manifold with group structure.
Knife Life


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backing up?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 4:14 am 
Offline
YMtC Idol Winner
User avatar

Joined: Sep 26, 2013
Posts: 1067
Generally, if you immediately decide not to do something after all, with little to no hesitation, you're going to be fine to back it up, no matter what REL you're playing in.

It's when you hesitate that problems may arise, because if you've had a chance to gain information about your opponent's responses (or lack thereof), a judge may be asking you pointed questions about why you changed your mind. Fishing is for the lake (or possibly the ocean), not a Magic tournament.

_________________
Level 2 Magic Judge
:w: ~ :u: ~ :b: ~ :r: ~ :g:
Knowledge knows no bounds.

And so people say to me, "How do I know if a word is real?" You know, anyone who's read a children's book knows that love makes things real. If you love a word, use it! That makes it real. Being in the dictionary is an artificial distinction; it doesn't make the word any more real than any other word. If you love a word, it becomes real.
--Erin McKean, Redefining the Dictionary


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backing up?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 10:16 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 25, 2013
Posts: 2891
Preferred Pronoun Set: Please don't refer to me
You should just ask zammm about the YMtC scenario DD.

_________________
A light in the darkness, trying to hide.


Winner of the 1st NGA Constructed Super League: PopularPariah


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backing up?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 1:37 pm 
Offline
YMtC Idol Winner
User avatar

Joined: Sep 26, 2013
Posts: 1067
YMtC scenario...?

_________________
Level 2 Magic Judge
:w: ~ :u: ~ :b: ~ :r: ~ :g:
Knowledge knows no bounds.

And so people say to me, "How do I know if a word is real?" You know, anyone who's read a children's book knows that love makes things real. If you love a word, use it! That makes it real. Being in the dictionary is an artificial distinction; it doesn't make the word any more real than any other word. If you love a word, it becomes real.
--Erin McKean, Redefining the Dictionary


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backing up?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:06 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Posts: 4649
Location: Alchemist's Refuge
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
Insipid Statement --
Sorcery
You may have an opponent choose X less than or equal to the number of lands you control as you choose X. If you do, Insipid Statement costs less to cast.
Search your library for a card with converted mana cost X, reveal it and put it into your hand. Then, shuffle your library.


razorborne wrote:
isn't Insipid Statement just free Sylvan Scrying?

also it doesn't work since the game can't force you to make mana.

:duel:


Fairly certain these are what spurred this question.

_________________
Former Rules Advisor (RA program ended 5-3-16)

Up High, Down Low, Whoops, Too Slow.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Backing up?
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 2:22 pm 
Offline
YMtC Idol Winner
User avatar

Joined: Sep 26, 2013
Posts: 1067
Free first-turn Mox/Black Lotus/Academy/Workshop/Chalice of the Void tutor? Seems good.

Yeah, having the opponent set the cost and then trusting the player to pay that cost really doesn't work at all, because you can't force the player to produce the necessary mana. You'd immediately run into the kind of "But if I have Suppression Field and Goblin Test Pilot, I can just keep trying and refuse to pay until the random target's what I want to hit!" shenanigans that would get players who tried it into trouble in competitive play, only this is just one card with no setup required.

_________________
Level 2 Magic Judge
:w: ~ :u: ~ :b: ~ :r: ~ :g:
Knowledge knows no bounds.

And so people say to me, "How do I know if a word is real?" You know, anyone who's read a children's book knows that love makes things real. If you love a word, use it! That makes it real. Being in the dictionary is an artificial distinction; it doesn't make the word any more real than any other word. If you love a word, it becomes real.
--Erin McKean, Redefining the Dictionary


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group