It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 5:46 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2016 7:01 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 5416
Location: somewhere btwn Achilles and the tortoise
Preferred Pronoun Set:
This has always confused me.

_________________






Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 13, 2016 7:20 pm 
Offline
YMtC Idol Winner
User avatar

Joined: Sep 26, 2013
Posts: 1067
Because then it doesn't work with Zombify, Quicksilver Amulet, Chord of Calling, Flicker, or anything else that can cause a creature to enter the battlefield without being cast. You'd also be able to do things like counter a Clone by Murdering its target.

_________________
Level 2 Magic Judge
:w: ~ :u: ~ :b: ~ :r: ~ :g:
Knowledge knows no bounds.

And so people say to me, "How do I know if a word is real?" You know, anyone who's read a children's book knows that love makes things real. If you love a word, use it! That makes it real. Being in the dictionary is an artificial distinction; it doesn't make the word any more real than any other word. If you love a word, it becomes real.
--Erin McKean, Redefining the Dictionary


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2016 6:18 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 5416
Location: somewhere btwn Achilles and the tortoise
Preferred Pronoun Set:
But it's, like, a replacement effect, right? Someone (I think DS) once told me it doesn't target because replacement effects never do. Is that true? And if so, why?

_________________






Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 14, 2016 6:33 pm 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15598
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
But it's, like, a replacement effect, right? Someone (I think DS) once told me it doesn't target because replacement effects never do. Is that true? And if so, why?

that's true, yes.

the basic answer is that replacement abilities don't use the stack. same reason mana abilities never target. for an obvious example of why that's a problem, consider frost titan. I have a Frost Titan. you play Clone. as is, you can copy my Titan just fine. but if Clone targets, then it triggers Titan's ability. but by the time that ability resolves, there's nothing to counter because the replacement effect has already happened.

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2016 6:05 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 07, 2015
Posts: 312
The replacement effect itself targeting is a nonsensical idea. Only things on the stack can target. The primary purpose of targeting is to give the opponent the relevant information for deciding how to respond. So a non-targeted spell that has a targeted replacement effect wouldn't work at all.

On the other hand, it's perfectly reasonable to have a targeted spell that a replacement effect that refers to that target. And I think that's the idea being discussed. They could change the rules to allow creature spells to target and they could then make it so Clone enters the battlefield as a copy of the creature it's targeting. It would just mean it wouldn't interact well with cards like GrifterMage listed and would just be messier in general.

Right now, all Aura spells target (and there are special rules for dealing with them entering the battlefield without being cast) and no other permanent spells target. Making it so that some non-Aura permanent spells also target would just muddle things.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 15, 2016 6:38 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15598
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
adeyke wrote:
On the other hand, it's perfectly reasonable to have a targeted spell that a replacement effect that refers to that target. And I think that's the idea being discussed. They could change the rules to allow creature spells to target and they could then make it so Clone enters the battlefield as a copy of the creature it's targeting. It would just mean it wouldn't interact well with cards like GrifterMage listed and would just be messier in general.

I assumed the point was less "hey let's have creature spells that target!" and more "hey why can you clone your opponent's Slippery Bogle?"

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group