No Goblins Allowed
http://862838.jrbdt8wd.asia/

The Name of the Set Will Go Here: A Card Repository
http://862838.jrbdt8wd.asia/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=17829
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Rush_Clasic [ Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:49 am ]
Post subject:  The Name of the Set Will Go Here: A Card Repository

This thread is just for gathering and cataloging information for the set. If you wish to talk about the set or make suggestions, please discuss it in the origin and idea thread

Name: (glass set)
Size: 250 cards (101 Commons, 80 Uncommons, 54 Rares, 15 Mythic)
Theme: A world made of glass, inhabited by creatures made of and related to glass.
Mechanical Focuses: CMCs, artifacts, multicolor and/or color matters

Creature Type synopsis

Author:  Rush_Clasic [ Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Name of the Set Will Go Here: A Card Repository

Commons (49/101)

Author:  Rush_Clasic [ Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:52 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Name of the Set Will Go Here: A Card Repository

Uncommons (6/80)

Author:  Rush_Clasic [ Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: The Name of the Set Will Go Here: A Card Repository

Rares (1/54)

Mythics (0/15)

Author:  TPmanW [ Sat Feb 11, 2017 7:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Name of the Set Will Go Here: A Card Repository

Chemical Blaze should probably only deal damage = to highest cmc. Against control, or just any multiplayer deck (oh god commander) this can reasonably hit for half your opponent's life total.
Also, no recombinant ooze? You my friend do not know a gem when you see one.

Author:  Rush_Clasic [ Wed Feb 15, 2017 12:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Name of the Set Will Go Here: A Card Repository

TPmanW wrote:
Chemical Blaze should probably only deal damage = to highest cmc. Against control, or just any multiplayer deck (oh god commander) this can reasonably hit for half your opponent's life total.

It's honestly fine if it can hit for half damage. Hitting for full damage is the real difficult thing to balance. It's not hard to imagine how that works: just having Emrakul, the Aeons Torn and Through the Breach in your hand does it, and that's already another viable combo to have in the same deck! Not sure where exactly the balance for this one exists. It might be highest, like you suggested, or discarding the hand, or just costed at 6RR. But for now, I like it.

TPmanW wrote:
Also, no recombinant ooze? You my friend do not know a gem when you see one.

It might be fine. Might even be exactly what I need. I suspect I'll have some sort of p/t = cmc sort of card, but I'd like to not trample too much on the feet of Magic history in doing so. I'm not really focused on rares at the moment, despite having two in the file.

Author:  TPmanW [ Wed Feb 15, 2017 10:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Name of the Set Will Go Here: A Card Repository

TPmanW wrote:
Also, no recombinant ooze? You my friend do not know a gem when you see one.

It might be fine. Might even be exactly what I need. I suspect I'll have some sort of p/t = cmc sort of card, but I'd like to not trample too much on the feet of Magic history in doing so. I'm not really focused on rares at the moment, despite having two in the file.

Fair enough, no sense locking down the ability onto a particular card yet.
Not getting the historical reference.
I actually figured it could be an uncommon. Originally I submitted it as a rare, but feedback said uncommon could work.

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/