It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 4:47 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 6:44 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 5416
Location: somewhere btwn Achilles and the tortoise
Preferred Pronoun Set:
Looking at the spoiler, it seems like Green doesn't really know what it wants. Throwing in some land love—for example, Landcycling —could help give it more of an identity. Are people on board with this idea?

_________________






Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 1:38 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 1398
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him
I still hate typecycling. If you want a land faction, it's fine, though—there's already a few isolated cards, I think, and they could use a home.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 3:06 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 5416
Location: somewhere btwn Achilles and the tortoise
Preferred Pronoun Set:
I just think Green is too spread out atm. It doesn't seem to know what it wants. TP's been talking about allies. That could be a Thing. (The rationale being that it shoots home the ETB creatures deck.)

_________________






Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 4:22 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 1398
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him
I don't think adding more themes is a good way to unspread a color. :V


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2015 12:27 am 
Offline
Conqueror of Eldangard
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 14139
Location: Kamloops, BC
Identity: Male
I would argue Allies are just a purer expression of an already present theme.

In regards to the topic at hand, I think a land faction would be a bad idea. A few land themed cards would be nice, but you have to go waaaay oput of your way to make lands a focus of an MTG set. Most blocks have a few artifacts/instants/creatures matter elements, but outside of Zendikar "lands matter" just doesn't exist.

_________________
Cato wrote:
CotW is a method for ranking cards in increasing order of printability.

*"To YMTC it up" means to design cards that have value mostly from a design perspective. i.e. you would put them in a case under glass in your living room and visitors could remark upon the wonderful design principles, with nobody ever worring if the cards are annoying/pointless/confusing in actual play

TPrizesW
TPortfolioW


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 13, 2015 1:21 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 5416
Location: somewhere btwn Achilles and the tortoise
Preferred Pronoun Set:
OT, but I think Desert Shimmer should have its cost reduced to , and that Gale of Denial should become:

Spellsnuff
Instant
Counter target spell unless its controller discards an instant or sorcery card.
"One way or another, spell will have its feast."
Seron, head transmuter


I don't think the spell deck should have a card focused on countering the spell deck.

_________________






Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group