It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 9:49 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Stupid Impact tremors
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:14 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 29, 2014
Posts: 309
when I go P1-1 Icefall regent, into P2-1 Icefall Regent, into P3-1Archfiend of Depravity, You think how can i lose?

simple, cause dash doesn't care about the rare's i pulled, nor the Defeat, or Ojutai's breath and will of the naga really. or even my sidisi faithful, and aven surveyor. All basically vanilla

now i heard the deck existed and i've played plenty of people MB the impact tremors and have NEVER lost to them. so when i seen his tremors , i thought free win. I'll play a game around all his dash creatures getting stuck in his hand, forcing him to invest all this mana each turn meanwhile i advance my board and get the win.
he had the cheapest dashers, like Beserker, scout, even mardu shadowspear. So when i played a threat, he wild slash, draconic roar, bathe , foul tongued , defeat , flatten , twin bolt my guy and still able to dash in.

I was pretty tilted at the lost. with time to reflect I must say i'm actually impressed that his deck of fodder and limited filler 23rd card in draft deck. was built so well to negate all the what i thought was good deck building i was doing. I wasn't able to do any tempo plays . my tempo cards were dead. as were any sorcery speed removal.

anyone else?

_________________
Thurgood Jenkins


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:30 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 07, 2013
Posts: 457
This format has me pretty tilted right now. I may try and hold back from playing until tempest masters can come in.

Though I feel the problem is deeper. It seems in the past year I've gone from somewhat slightly respectable as a player to down right trash. It feels you can hand me the most well tuned deck, take a pile of unplayables for yourself, line up against me and bash my brains in.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:36 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 8960
Location: Brazil
I thought the deck of synergistic Commons winning against Broken_Rares.dec was a sign of a good format, not of a bad one :confused:

_________________
Yes, I'm from Brazil and no, I'm not an annoying ****.

RPG characters


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:43 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Nov 19, 2013
Posts: 481
felbatista wrote:
I thought the deck of synergistic Commons winning against Broken_Rares.dec was a sign of a good format, not of a bad one :confused:


This times 1000. Magic shouldn't be a scratch off ticket game. I'll take 22/23 cards with synergy over 3 bombs and 5-7 fringe cards in a 40 card deck.

I played against a tremors deck yesterday for the first time. It sucked really bad, I 2-0'd him. But I applaud the guy for testing it out.

I tried to make a discard deck on MTGO Saturday night and went 1-1 in an 8-4. It was fun to play with but it also sucked.

You know you are in trouble when you are waiting for your next card and thinking "come on, just give me one more mind rot!"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:46 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 1399
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him
I haven't played this format much and I'm really bad at it, but it seems fun so far and I'm happy the commons aren't ass. It isn't as great as triple Khans was, but that's a high standard, and Dragons replacing Khans packs didn't make things worse nearly as much as Fate Reforged replacing a Khans pack did.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 3:22 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 7260
felbatista wrote:
I thought the deck of synergistic Commons winning against Broken_Rares.dec was a sign of a good format, not of a bad one :confused:

_________________
"Everything looks good when your opponent passes 4 turns in a row" -- rstnme
"Something that does not look good when your opponent does nothing is not a thing" -- me


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 12:45 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 07, 2013
Posts: 3433
The ways you can lose to commons in this format are just so many. Which is excellent. And removal-with-just-any-bears is a very solid deck in this format. I can't remember offhand the last time it was possible to draft ten good to excellent removal spells in a format. That little Imp will kill a lot of people.

_________________
Go draft, young man, go draft!


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 1:16 pm 
Offline
YMtC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Oct 17, 2013
Posts: 3486
Preferred Pronoun Set: He
felbatista wrote:
I thought the deck of synergistic Commons winning against Broken_Rares.dec was a sign of a good format, not of a bad one :confused:

People want their sweet broken Rares to actually increase their chance of winning, making commons better than Rares makes for a lot of bad feels.

Also, I'm not a fan of 9 removal spells.dek being so powerful. I liked the decrease in removal

Still the format can be fun, I just wish green wasn't so underpowered, I want to draft Stampeding Elkherd every time I see it.

_________________
The cake is a differential manifold with group structure.
Knife Life


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:15 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 29, 2014
Posts: 309
Elk Herd is considered strong game, and it's not hard balancing the off color for pack 3, you can usually have plenty of Green/ X playables before P3, then get your Sandblast/Heelcutters/Reach/Lotus path's and the occasion Hunt the weak and if you can snag a couple Whisperer of the wilds it makes Pilgrim of fires strong play


little FYI, Pilgram of Fires is the same mech on Witness of the Ages

_________________
Thurgood Jenkins


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:31 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 2979
Custodian of the Trove is what Pilgrim of the Fires became in the Dragons timeline. (Witness of the Ages was in the Khans timeline.)


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 4:42 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 8960
Location: Brazil
Dr_Demento wrote:
felbatista wrote:
I thought the deck of synergistic Commons winning against Broken_Rares.dec was a sign of a good format, not of a bad one :confused:

People want their sweet broken Rares to actually increase their chance of winning, making commons better than Rares makes for a lot of bad feels.



It's not like you don't have plenty of ridiculous Rares in the Set. The third pack is basically just them and shaft :P

_________________
Yes, I'm from Brazil and no, I'm not an annoying ****.

RPG characters


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2015 10:04 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Feb 13, 2015
Posts: 897
I only draft U/B control at all times.

U/B is good. I'm happy.

_________________
PLAY 3CM IT'S IN MAGIC GENERAL IF YOU DON'T YOU SUCK AT LIFE


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 9:41 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 3673
Identity: Goblin Piker
Format is fine. I've lost over half of my drafts I've done of it, but format is fine.

My issue is more that the colors have glaring issues that can only be solved by opening the right cards. I often struggle with getting enough game winning bombs for UB control, that being the big one for me.

I think red/black with heavy removal is one of the better decks in the format.

_________________
Twitter: (at)MrEnglish22 if you want to reach me
My cube: https://cubecobra.com/cube/list/mrenglish22


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 8:36 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 29, 2014
Posts: 309
Jman22 wrote:
Format is fine. I've lost over half of my drafts I've done of it, but format is fine.

My issue is more that the colors have glaring issues that can only be solved by opening the right cards. I often struggle with getting enough game winning bombs for UB control, that being the big one for me.

I think red/black with heavy removal is one of the better decks in the format.


that is a very strong arguement, I've noticed in all my U/B builds, i'm having to MB a mindscour dragon, or Scion of Ugin as bomb win cons, sometimes 2x ojutai summons and a lotus path djinn will work. but i've never had the bomb for those color combo's you kinda have to go evasive flyers with your non-exploit creatures, while red has Sabertooth and efreet that punch hard at common.

_________________
Thurgood Jenkins


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 10:19 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 07, 2013
Posts: 3433
Might that be because UB is overdrafted?

In some other color combos, you mostly go for them if you open a bomb, or a great uncommon. Maybe Pacifism, from a weak pack. Like jman said, looking just at commons and uncommons, some combinations are simply weak in Dragons. But many people will go for UB just on principle, because it's the best deck (?). That can leave the players that open UB bombs without a deck, and players that don't open them, with a weak deck that can't really win the game despite all the card advantage. What does that mean anyway, when you keep drawing Palace Familiars, and they keep dropping Glade Watchers and Elk Herds?

This is of course true for any color combo, but not many people force UW or GW. If the cards come, fine; if not, let's look at red or black instead. On the other hand, blue and especially black are deep, and it's sometimes hard to see you're being cut on both of them.

_________________
Go draft, young man, go draft!


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 1:11 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Nov 19, 2013
Posts: 481
The idea of drafting a specific deck most of the time seems crazy to me.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 2:38 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 7260
I would not describe blue as deep in this set.

_________________
"Everything looks good when your opponent passes 4 turns in a row" -- rstnme
"Something that does not look good when your opponent does nothing is not a thing" -- me


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 28, 2015 6:31 pm 
Offline
YMtC Champ '12
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 5218
Location: California
I've finally got a hang of this format. The Tremor deck, and the BR aggro deck in particular, seem best in my experience when you do just what Johnny said: MAKE IT CHEAP! If I'm not playing 16 lands max in my BR deck, I've done something wrong. I don't even like drafting 3-drops until I have to, and I love most of the 2-drops AND 1-drops. Tremor itself is a tricky card, and I don't like it unless I have a lot of ways to abuse it, but I've definitely ton 10+ damage with one.

_________________
Dies to Removal | Karados


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 29, 2015 8:57 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 29, 2014
Posts: 309
any twitch stream watchers here? Yall see Trey Van Cleaved Impact tremors deck last nite, 3 MB copied of tremos, all the cheapest dash creates and a curve topout of 2 sabertooths, he had limited removal like a roast and maybe a tail slash. I was real interested in watching the out come, I thought he played well but went 0-2 and lost to lose calm both games, he was a little sour where he knew his opp mained a Lose calm and would be dead to it if he didn't leave an extra blocker back, when he was playing for the next turn magmatic chasm win

_________________
Thurgood Jenkins


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group