Hey DS how would the crowing of a new emperor even occur in this world? I assume normally it would be hereditary but the whole war situation has caused things to go pear shaped? Why would the priest be worried about the temple being demolished?
Yes, the war had left the government resource-starved and fragile and the emperor dying without a clear successor or even two or three successors to choose from led to the collapse of the imperial government.
There are a number of ways that someone can become the new emperor, but they all involve being able to consolidate enough power that one can declare oneself the emperor without anyone being able to meaningfully dissent. It's a big King of the Hill game.
Wu History
Wu Hon Yin can recall learning about the history of the Yi Dynasty in his tutoring. It is unusual in that the ascension of the first Yi Emperor was relatively bloodless. After the collapse of the Faa Dynasty due to massive internal corruption leading to a military coup, Yi Mut Ko was the appointed judge who led the trials and investigations into the corruption charges. After his work was done, he advised the military government under General Hung to transition back to a civilian government. Yi Mut Ko's wisdom, grace, and virtue, traits that prevented his promotion within the Faa government, made him the perfect candidate for the new emperor.
A few nobles protested his peasant background and other government officials recognized his wisdom but thought he was better suited to a minister position rather than emperor. The military that supported Yi was able to quell those nobles and regional governors who protested by raising their own armies. Yi was able to convert many of his other detractors through diplomacy, including his composition of a book on judgement that convinced many of his capability. It is said that he won the support of one governess by performing a spontaneous poem before her court. When Yi Mut Ko's support across Jin stabilized, he was crowned the Yishen Emperor, the father of the Yi Dynasty.
I just remembered! We have to determine how we want to approach natural 1s and 20s. The only standard rule on them is that a natural 20 on an attack roll is a critical hit.
I prefer natural 20s on ability checks to not be automatic successes and natural 1s on attack and ability checks to trigger a saving throw. On failure, the roll becomes a fumble, aka critical failure. What do you people think?
Joined: Oct 17, 2013 Posts: 3486
Preferred Pronoun Set: He
Meh, I don't care much either way about crits and fumbles.
As for company structure, we are small enough that it probably makes sense for us not to have a formal command structure. It is hard to hold a leadership role when there is no chance for distance between you and your followers. Maybe we have an informal voting system in place when we have disagreements though, and a tiebreaker method in place?
Actually, thinking about it, it would not be a save but a reroll of the attack or ability check. I am thinking this:
If a creature rolls a natural 1 on an attack roll or an ability check, that creature rerolls that attack or ability check, aiming to hit the same AC or DC.
If the reroll is successful, there is no fumble. The creature may still succeed on the original roll (such as if the natural 1 is modified enough to hit the AC or DC).
If the reroll fails or is a natural 1, there is a fumble, meaning a negative effect as determined by the DM.
So, you can get randomly screwed by a natural 1, but the easier the original roll was, the easier it is to avoid a fumble.
The other thing I am interested in is a 'variant' from the DMG, where if a player fails an attack roll or ability check by ~1, the DM may bump it up so that the AC/DC is hit, but with a minor setback. Like, your sword swing manages to hit but you lose your balance and your movement is halved for a turn. This won't always apply but if people are open to it, I'll use it from time to time.
I really should have remembered to ask all this before starting.
Question for the party: are we the kind of mercenary company that is good and trustworthy, or backstabbing our own contractors is not out of the realm of possibilities?
_________________
Yes, I'm from Brazil and no, I'm not an annoying ****.
Joined: Oct 30, 2013 Posts: 7305 Location: England
Well I for one am all about the honour system so when I give my word I tend to mean it - especially if the contract in question was given to fellow religious types.
Of course that said if our contract was given in bad faith or our contractors tried to betray us I wouldn't be opposed to running them through. Pretty sure word of honour doesn't count when given to dishonourable men.
_________________
Welcome! I'm Garren and I'll be your designated villain for the evening.
Regarding the chest: You all have bags, presumably, to carry the money. You can abandon the chest at any time by taking a few minutes to distribute the money amongst yourselves. You can also just put your chest in one of your bags or strap it to a bag.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum