Despite telling me that I don't care about the game, I have done more quality solving in the last few hours than KoD has this entire game.
Yeah, if by solving you mean focusing strictly on yourself to try and prove yourself to us with arguments that can go either way.
I've underscored the danger inherent in you being a powerwolf. Yes, you can field the argument of, "Why would I focus on CL when, as scum, I would be happy either either KoD or Faerie?" Positing that, though, requires WIFOM logic because, surprise, none of us know how you'd play as a wolf. And even if you give us *some* games to go by, that doesn't strictly mean that, in this game at this time, you wouldn't do the exact opposite of what it is you're claiming.
But let me back up a moment and focus elsewhere as I have done at various points in the game. Let me stop focusing on you. Let me focus on Faerie once again.
Faerie, as I have commented on numerous times, has had a logic progression that has been weird to me wrt to CL and JD. Remember, she, like you, didn't vote at all on D1 which allowed for the two wagons that day to rand (Arrgh vs CL). She had posited a pool of four people that included Dusky, CL, myself (I think), and JD (or it may be someone else entirely as I'm forgetting off the top of my head the exact four names). But what I do remember is going into D2, after JD was killed, she openly commented on how she would have voted JD D2 if he were still alive, but instead went for CL. This came about because she talked about how, during the night I suppose, she came to the conclusion on how scummy JD was (and I guess CL). This despite the fact that of the wagons on D1 Arrgh was one and CL (he was in her pool of four) was the other wagon. And she didn't vote there.
So when she talks about voting JD if he were still alive, and going after CL next it came off as weird. Weird because why not vote CL since you're somewhat suspicious? Why not save Arrgh since you're not suspicious? It was that lack of action, yet context given on the people, that seemed odd. Course with the rand that occurred, both Zinger and I felt CL had to be town and scum didn't care who was killed (an obvious error given CL's alignment).
But Faerie did claim the ability to restore a passive. Plus, Zinger had lost his passive midday (D2) while voting for me while I was trying to push him. For Faerie to actively hinder Zinger while agreeing with Zinger, more or less, against me seems odd to say the least. Course, Faerie did end up restoring Zinger's passive given that Zinger was able to double vote me D3. So she proved her claim.
I may not have liked how she logically progressed herself, but mechanically she's proven her ability as she's claimed it. So that, as far as I am concerned, is a point in her favor. Oh, I did entertain the idea that perhaps she could disable and reenable passives, but what purpose would it serve her to actively hinder Zinger against me? It would make much more sense for someone outside of us (like you or Tevish or even CL) to be the source of the passive disable.
So, again, Faerie is fine for the most part. I certainly wouldn't put her above you given everything you've generated today. I also won't put her above Tevish because, due to my paranoia, Tevish just stands as the one I'd swing at for being too agreeable to me. Make no mistake though. As Dusky put it simply, Tevish responded much better than you which is why I'm content with you being lynched over him today.
I'm not considering Dusky or Silver.