@KoD
Quote:
BTW, are we at an understanding about the whole "my perspective" bit concerning me prior to Eli confessing? Or do you think I had an entirely different agenda despite the fact knowledge was hidden from us thanks to Eli?
Yeah, I read your big post at the start of day again.
Quote:
I've offered something within the context of the game to backup what I've been saying. Aside from just disagreeing with me due to "bad game design", can you tell me 100% beyond a shadow of doubt that what I've stated isn't the case?
Of course not. Nothing is 100 percent in this game. For me it's all about the mathematics. The bigger percentage wins. Even if it's 51/49
And I've yet to decide how big a percentage your claims will help me.
----------------------------------------------
Alright, so let's see if I have the complete picture of the switching with all claims combined (not going to judge truth/false yet, just an overview):
Game starts. Neo = Cultist, PoPa and Rubik are possessed.
D1/N1 PoPa and Rubik are together in a QT. There is no mention of a 3rd person. A town Rubik (which he was at that point) would have mentioned that third one though.
At the end of N1: Rubik --> Eli
D2/N2: Eil and Neo in a QT. Eli was
not able to make a decision for N2. Was able to make a decision for N3. Choose not to kill.
At the end of N2: Eli --> KoD.
N2/D3/N3: KoD can make decision about N2. Doesn't because he missed it.
At the end of N3: KoD --> ??? (current target. Not me.)
---------------------------------
So given that the claims regarding N2 were both made during this day it seems obvious that the conundrum and final solution of this game sits there.
And we're back at the last few days again. Eli vs KoD.
The problem is that both of you made a claim that is counter-intuitive with either Rubik or each other.
KoD: The choice for kill on N2 if Eli made a choice at N2. This is of course against Eli's claim that he had control over the N2 kill and choose not to.
Eli: The QT that includes Neo, who was confirmed not to be in Rubiks (Rubik had no reason to lie anymore when he was town)
Now to look back at some other stuff: Elis claim
Eli wrote:
I was possessed Day 2 and night 2.
I was in a quick topic with NeoSilk. As I have said, in every post regarding this, a smart player will not try to kill during the night, when its likely a return to town status awaits them. Thus, when my true target was lynched, I opted to make no kill (Sorry Neo, I spent an extensive amount of time privately rule checking that I could team kill during Day 2).
I said before why I think that's weird.
Quote:
I withheld this information day 3, to avoid people quickly trying to piggyback on a set of information I knew only myself, rubik and a possessed player would have.
During D2 Kod and myself were pretty gung ho about trying to confirm Rubik somehow and figure out the game. After all, that was pretty crucial town info since at that time only the (former) Possessed would know about the surroundings of the possession.
Not coming forward D3 if you were possessed D2 wasted a Rubik lynch that was extremely easy to stop just by coming forward at the start of D3. It was by that time obvious that I would not vote for Rubik if his claim was true, and 15377 would also have to come around on Rubik. We would've saved the doc.
Quote:
I personally suspect that Im immune to further possession, but there arent enough days in the game for this to be worth anything.
So with this in mind, there is a world where possession still freely moves, in which case Garren is scum, or a world in which possession has locked down for the long run, in which KoD is possessed.
I remembered something about the free-moving possession. I did some calculations and with 2 possessing ghosts going around:
1 = Neo
D1: 23, 2 town die (45)
D2: 67, 2 town die (89)
D3: ??? (2-1-2. Game is still on but no-one left for possession?)
The conclusion seems to be that repossession
is possibleAnd the locked possession does not match up with any game-altering event. A random ghost lock after N2 makes no sense.
So, to conclude:
Elis claim was after KoDs claim, but contradicts some info give by Rubik and from KoDs claim.
The lack of info at D3 regarding Rubik wasted the towns lynch on the Doc of the game. Unless he didn't have that info because he wasn't possessed.
I might change my mind again soon, but I think it's time to make a stand. Time to make a guess.
Vote: Eli