They all seem like bad townies. That's the problem PopPa.
Kind of.
Mafia strategy isn't a truth, it isn't easily quantifiable. It flows and changes based on how people play. While we can say they are playing like bad townies, and we're probably right, I like to think that maybe we're just a bottle of Araujo Eisele California next to a case of Bud Light.
I think that being a bad townie is something that we see as a problem. While normal mafia veterans want to see a vibrant game, they kind of get stuck in the expectations they have. "Don't do this, don't do that". Long arguments between two players of semantics intimidate newer players who want to learn. The fact that we have bad townies is a good thing, not necessarily for town in a particular game, but as an overall aspect of our metagame. Having bad townies means we have a bunch of sets of eyes, we have a lot of perspectives. It also means that we have a lot of players who are willing to learn.
Yes, we make sacrifices in a game by not punishing them, but at the same time I don't think it's an appropriate action to see "bad townies" as an inherently bad thing.
An issue arises when analyzing what a "bad townie" is. Is it someone who plays like how mafia is perceived to play? Is it someone who doesn't analyze their posts before posting? Is it someone who isn't using good mafia strategy? Perhaps it's some combination of these, but none of it actually matters.
While I did perhaps shortcut by my statement of seeing Ambar as just a bad townie what I really meant is that I get the feeling that he is genuine, and I don't want him lynched simply because he's perhaps not the greatest player. I don't think his statements are irrelevant on whether we lynch him, but I do think that, like most things in mafia, it's about reads and feelings. I don't think it's appropriate to weight everyone's actions on the same scale.
If PK were to come in here and act like Ambar, we are faced with the choice of treating him the same as Ambar or treat him differently. I personally prefer to treat different contexts differently, because that's how I see things, and because I don't care about any particular game. I'm not a conventional player, so I've perhaps gotten biased agaisnt policies of pursuing certain actions, but also my intense studies into competitive gaming and game theory has taught me that there aren't absolutes in strategy.
So yeah, I don't see being a bad townie as being a problem per se, but rather I think it's a call to analyze players with different contexts in mind.
I don't think Ambar is mafia because of how I feel, not because of any evidence I can claim to make in his defense.