Really?

You're going to attempt to goad me by prodding my ego?

is it working?

In my assessment of this wagon HW and Darkstar are likely town. Monster isn't bold enough to be called scum yet, but still could be. Rag is undoubtedly Ancient Egyptian aligned Grand Cult Master.

@Rag:

Also, DarkStar was the third vote on the wagon. The Jeep tell tells me that DarkStar is scum; however, I have some humanity left in me that would make me feel bad for tunneling him over this.


Incidentally, Arrgh is looking like absolute fire over there with his attempts at trying to remain chill.

No I am not scum and I tell you why...

My second name is Scumhunter3000 !!!!

But what it it's one of those ironical names like little john?

My john is definitely not little!

Btw I am always open to change my vote to one of the 2 or 3 players that are super inactive.

Votecount 1.3
JayDreven (4): M0nster, Hello World, DaRkStAr, Ragnarokio
Aaarrrgh (1): KingofDominaria

Not voting: Aaarrrgh, JayDreven, Naga

Day 1 Deadline is on Saturday at 7pm EST. With 8 players alive, the Majority is 5 votes.

JayDreven is now at L -1 (meaning, he is one vote away from being Lynched by Majority Vote and ending the Day early).

KoD, might not want to push someone over a procedural scumtell, but I have no such qualms. Besides, the JD wagon happened way too quickly, and as such I would prefer there to be an alternative.

Vote: DaRkStAr

Not that I care too much at this point. I just want us to have some variety.

my keyboard broke im inactive for abt 1 week replace if needed sry

And that right there is classic scum Arrgh. He openly states no issue with pushing someone over a procedural scumtell (an agreement with the issue against JD), yet veers away from hammering JD. All because he wants a new wagon on someone else.

This accomplishes contribution to the discussion at hand while not hammering, thus avoiding the major attention that goes with it.


Arrgh is scum. Let's vote him into oblivion.

I fully agree with KoD.

Unvote

Vote:Aaarrrgh

KoD's logic checks out. Plus, I was starting to feel uncomfortable with how many people quickly backed my JD wagon over an admittedly weak hunch.

Vote: Aaarrrgh

Here's half a vote for aaarrrgh, make of this what you want
Unvote

Second part of the vote when I get more sure that he's scum, still not use to this whole "sheeping kod" thing, but I suppose among us might have helped him fixing his game.

Wait, that was serious? interesting.

I speculated to Dusky after the last game that I was taken out first because Monster either read me completely or she worried about me being the opposing team after tevish's mafia. Her early vote this game could be an extension of the latter. *Shrugs*

Worth mentioning, Rag has notified me of her inactivity due to outside game circumstances. Her activity will be super light for a week, after which she should return. She's promised to follow along and make the occasional post as best she can. She shouldn't be lumped in with the other "inactives".

Also, for what it is worth, nobody's activity has been sub-par from a Mod standpoint. Rule 6 states you have to be absent for more than 48 hours without notice before the Mod gets cranky, and nobody has violated that rule as of yet (I've been checking). Course, none of that should stop you from lynching whoever you want for whatever reason you want, and you can define "super inactive" however you want to fit that end. I'm merely pointing out that I'm satisfied with player activity as a Mod.

Hold on. You think that I'm scum because I didn't hammer JD, but you also think that the JD wagon was bad (which presumably means you think scum wanted it to happen)? That doesn't add up, and you look super opportunistic to me. Time to be slightly less chill.

Unvote; vote: M0nster

OH HEEEEELL NO! You're not going to do me like that! Hold on, let me get my Red Pen™ so I can show people how blatant your misrepresentations of me are in that terrible post of yours.

No, I said I think you're scum because KoD's logic checks out. Let's review KoD's logic, shall we?
As you can clearly see, KoD (and by extension, me), thinks you're scum because you have no qualms with a JD Lynch, regardless of its merits, yet are unwilling to stand by it with your vote because you'd prefer to start a brand new wagon that has very remote chances of going anywhere and likely is just to appear as though you are contributing without actually doing so. Apparently, KoD says this fits right into your meta as scum, which I happen to agree with based on my limited (singular) experience of being scum with you. You fence-sit as scum to try and fly by the wayside avoiding attention as long as you can. I called you out for as much in our scum chat when we were scum together in that game before last, and I see the pattern repeating here. I'm just jealous KoD pointed it out before I noticed it. So, to be clear, it is your fence-sitting and attempts to appear relevant without actually being relevant that is getting you this negative attention, NOT specifically your refusal to hammer JD. Moving on.

Here you misrep me again. NO, I did not say the JD wagon was BAD, I said it was a weak hunch (which, it is, and I admitted as much the minute I voted him; check my post if you don't believe me). What I found unsettling was how many other people were willing to quickly jump on the bandwagon based on a weak hunch. I was comfortable placing my vote on JD in a vacuum of knowledge based on my weak hunch, but why were no less than THREE other people also willing to throw their votes on him based on the weak hunch of someone else who's motives they can't possibly know for certain? So, again, to be clear: the JD wagon wasn't BAD, and I'm not harping on you because you were UNWILLING TO HAMMER. The JD wagon WAS weak and the rapid support of it was SUSPICIOUS, but that has nothing to do with you being voted for being a FENCE-SITTING BYSTANDER WHO'S TRYING TO LOOK BUSY AND PRODUCTIVE WITHOUT ACTUALLY BEING SO.

And through all these mistruths you spewed my way, you still haven't taken a second to address KoD's initial concerns of you in the first place. You'd rather try really hard to twist perspectives and point fingers my way than to answer for your own behaviour. THAT'S opportunistic (relevant, since you're so concerned about people being opportunistic). So, in conclusion, let's correct your post. After all, that's what the Red Pen™ is for...


Now, you see? Doesn't it feel better to be honest when you post? I think that's enough Red Pen™ for now.

If I could vote you a second time, Aaarrrgh, I would, but since I can't, I'm just going to sit here and be slightly less chill about it. #micdrop