@Nik:
The thing with Fred is because of his comment to me near the end of D2 when he said, "you know I will," in regards to him coming and posting. He posted, just nothing useful. That's why I said what I did to him because he should put effort into at least something for me. Other than that, not relevant.
And yet again, you're not confirmed except in your own mind.
All Neo has to go off of is:
1. N1 - He was told that he had been drinking. He was told that you didn't leave your house.
2. N2 - He was told he had been drinking heavily. He was told that he definitely saw his target leave their house.
The mod flat out told Neo that not everything about his role would be revealed to him. So the full extent of his role is not known to any of us. Because of this, we don't know (this is a fact and can't be disputed) exactly ***how*** Neo's role works. Does him drinking mean he is good at his job or bad? Does him not drinking make him good or bad at his job?
For all we know, the fact that he drank means he gets a negative for his result and a positive for when he doesn't drink -- Meaning that since he didn't drink the first N1, he must have got a positive (the person actually left their house), and on N2 when he did drink he got a negative (the person didn't actually leave their house -- he just imagined it). That's just one scenario for how his role might work. Perhaps the drinking is not relevant in any sense and his role just alternates with his results each day.
Point is, as I maintained in a previous post, you're as confirmed town as a baby face scum that was investigated by a paranoid cop. You maintaining otherwise simply means you are town and are just affirming Neo's one result (which begs the question why are you alive instead of Zinger? Because the wolf wanted to kill off a relative unknown compared to you and allow you to spread your whole I'm town mentality everyone?). Or it means you are the wolf trying to wear the "confirmation" from Neo as townie pants so you can ride it to the end (at least this explains why the wolf would let a "confirmed" townie live. Because the wolf is that "townie".).
And your what-if scenario with Pariah being the guard and Neo being the wolf -- you were part of the discussions for that. The general opinion of everyone is that it is too risky for the wolf to do that. Furthermore, more so than everyone's opinion on it is the actual ***fact*** that it literally is too risky for the wolf to claim the guard in that scenario. Does the wolf know that Pariah is the guard? No. Do we know? No. Pariah never said what he was. He could have been the guard. Or the hunter. Or the healer. Or Pariah could have simply been vanilla flavored townie. Now tell me, what is the chance that the wolf would grow such a big pair and claim that knowing full well he would be banking his chance at winning the game on such slim odds that Pariah was the guard? I'll tell you. No chance in hell. Snowball's chance of surviving on the surface of the sun. Zilch. Nada. Now what was the point of this what-if scenario that you should be familiar with? Faith in Neo? Neo asked me at the start of today if I disbelieved his result. Or something like that (maybe he asked if I thought he was lying?). I don't think he's lying one bit. I fully believe he is town aligned and that he is the town guard power role. What I also know for a fact is that no one here knows the *****full scope***** of Neo's role. Not even himself. Not even you. As I've iterated many a time, without more data we don't know fully how his role works. All you are doing is making the very dangerous assumption that you are confirmed town simply because ***YOU*** "confirm" his result on you was accurate AND that his next result must be accurate as well since it is different from his result on you. All the different scenarios aside from how his role could work, you are NEGLECTING one very important thing -- the heavy drinking he did. No one, especially you, knows how that drinking effects his result in any way, shape, or form. You'll have to excuse me for bringing you down to reality, but you are NOT confirmed town in anyway.
At this point I need to backtrack to address some aspect of the above paragraph in regards to a comment of yours:
Quote:
I don't have more info regarding his role. I am merely surmising what we do have. He was not told he drank too much on N1. He was told he did on N2. The role could work entirely differently than we expect, but it seems to me that if he knows he drank too much last night, he probably didn't on the first night. Ergo, the result is more likely to be valid on that night.
You are right that there are any number of possibilities, but to ignore the simplest explanation in the belief this role is really complex seems rather like intentionally ignoring it. Obviously, giving the simplest explanation for why I wasn't killed last night is I'm scum, both of these things can't possibly be true. Still, I find it strange you are ignoring this.
I don't know if you get this, but I will try to be forward in explaining it so you understand. We all have the same info in front of us in regards to Neo's role. Yes, he was told he drank too much on N2 and nothing was said about drinking on N1. And yes, we were told he didn't see you leave your home on N1 and that he is definitely sure that someone left their home on N2. What do we draw from these conclusions? Well, IF we take you at your word, then sure his N1 result is accurate. Perhaps the alcohol has no effect on him and he really did see someone leave their home on N2. But here is the problem: We have to trust your word in regards to his N1 result. This is why your staunch belief that you are confirmed town is flawed in a serious way and why you don't seem to understand the issue at hand here when you butt heads with me.
It all simply boils down to the fact that there is not enough data on Neo's role to make accurate assumptions. Simple as that.
Now, about the safe scum idea of mine. I apply it by looking for connections not based on what a person openly says (and taking their word on what they say). What this means is I actually don't consider what you are saying here because, if you are the scum, you will only lie. Instead I look for what fits. Like an intricate puzzle. Everyone was on board with the idea that the wolf wouldn't claim a power role because it was too risky. This is safe scum ideology to me. It fits. This is why I can fully believe Neo is town. But what else then when considering safe scum? Well, safe scum idea aside, as far as this game has gone you bothered me with your switch to me D2 about being suspicious. Especially since you put more effort into describing me as suspicious rather than Lilan (again, you were very broad and vague which is a factor for me focusing you). But this along doesn't fit. I mean sure, I find it odd that you'd play WIFOM and use what I said about Rubik and Fred during D1 as a reason to view me as suspicious D2 due to Rubik having been sired. After all, you could be lying about who you would sire. But anyway my "casual dismissal", as you put it, was convenient for you to be suspicious of me. Perhaps you sired him and used that line of logic to justify it. WIFOM.
But that is my own feeling in regards to you and how you came across me on D2 while keeping D1 (and how not aggressive you were to me). What threw me into going after you was not a feeling, but, and this is back to the safe scum idea, the fact that you were not killed during the night and Zinger was. Wolf could have tried to kill Neo since there MIGHT be a healer, but the wolf didn't risk wasting his night kill on the chance that there is a healer in this game. Wolf is playing safe, not risky. Why wouldn't the Wolf kill the person that is trying to be confirmed as town though? I mean let's consider a scenario where you are indeed town and the wolf is someone else. Ok, you're town and were watched by Neo. You confirmed Neo's result. Wolf has a choice: Let you live knowing full well you are town and that the town is going to treat you as such (After all, you did celebrate being confirmed); Or, kill you to reduce the number of "confirmed" people in the game. Obviously killing you would leave four others for the wolf to hide in while the sixth person (Neo) would be the only confirmed. But rather than do that, the Wolf is going to lower his chance of survival by lowering the pool of suspects to look at (this helps the town) by killing off one of the unconfirmed people rather than you -- Zinger. Effectively the Wolf has lowered his life span.
Now I've mentioned before that I am playing with WIFOM since I am assuming the Wolf will make a particular move (as you have assumed) in regards to who to kill. But my idea is consistent with the Wolf playing safe. Yours is not. It makes far more sense for the wolf to kill one of the confirmed townies (you in this case). You were not killed, Zinger was. This means only one thing (two technically): The wolf must be the "townie" that wasn't killed. The other, technical, one is that the wolf is being risky, but I have no reason to suspect the wolf will play risky. Why should I? The Wolf has been playing safe up to now. No reason to assume otherwise.
Now, to the meat of the matter. I have more meat with my bone than you do. My reasons to view you as the wolf are fully justified since it is mostly based on fact rather than feeling. The fact that you did not die last night, the fact that you are not confirmed town, and the feeling (spawned from your numerous perspective flips) you generated by how you have acted. Speaking of those feelings, odd thing with what you just said.
Quote:
I can point to certain posts that gave me weird vibes if you like, but I'm not going to try to force evidence if I don't believe it is there.
In that post you speak theoretically rather than factually. Could you twist posts from someone? Sure. Have you? No. Course I'm not twisting posts to provide foundation for my case. But it is odd that you would go from viewing me as the suspicious one to viewing Lilan as the suspicious one and then turn around and say "I'm not going to try to force evidence if I don't believe it is there." Let's be frank, you and I, Nik. After I voted you today, you changed your tune so quick to Lilan without any sort of meat at all. Just broad and vague words. And to top it off, while theoretically speaking of Lilan, you don't even provide any kind of posts to twist or anything to support your suspicion of her because you, and I quote, "not going to try to force evidence if I don't believe it is there." Yous say you are suspicious of her because [blank], yet you say won't force evidence because you don't believe it is there. You're contradicting yourself. Lilan was your target for suspicion, but not even you believe there is proof for that suspicion. Just "weird vibes." At least I have provided evidence, that I didn't even have to twist, for my suspicion of you.
Oh well. In the end, you're just the wolf to me.