It is currently Wed Dec 04, 2024 10:18 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 502 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 26  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 4:37 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Aug 05, 2014
Posts: 6083
Location: Here. Always.
I saw you browsing several times before you finally got around to posting. Perhaps he's doing like you and digesting all the pages?

Anyway, the crucial thing about PopPa is that I'm giving him a pass on his lurking because of last game with him. He lurked there as scum, but this time around the content of his posts just feels different. So that's why I'm giving him a pass. Besides, the post where you "contributed" was within the joke phase as far as I was concerned since we were all throwing votes around. That's why I kept bringing your name up (admittedly it was due to Rubik that you even came up since he's focused on lurkers or so it seems).

_________________
Spoiler


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 5:12 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 23, 2014
Posts: 1106
Rubik wrote:
I'm not at all abandoning playing the game and I'm not suggesting that everyone just put their vote on lurkers and sit there. I do, however, think it's important that a few players keep voting pressure on lurkers to encourage them to post.

Zinger, NeoSilk, and SeTiny are all complete deadweight right now. I'd like them to read the thread and give their input on something relevant to the game or I'd like them to replace out for someone who will. There are slightly less lurky players who I'd also like to see more from, but none so bad as these first few.

If you think it's better to ignore the fact that players are lurking until just before the deadline and then kill them instead of giving them a chance to improve, that's your prerogative. It's not my fault that your strategy is bad.


Pressuring lurkers is a process that tends to let people post an "I'm here. Some quick thoughts" and go right back to lurking. It might work if you have two lurkers in a town of 12, but we don't really have the numbers to pressure large pieces of the town when they decide to go off and not participate in the game.

Hence Policy lynching. Regardless of how good it is for the current game, you choose to kill of lurkers in an attempt to stop it from happening both in the current and future games. Putting a vote on a lurker and making his type a quick post isn't probably going to help the situation, just allow people to have to work slightly if they want to lurk.

As a strategy towards winning this game, LaL lynch is bad. As a strategy towards eliminating future lurking, it's good.

Freddeh wrote:
Niklor wrote:
Even the lurkers want to policy lynch lurkers, these days. Poor guys.


I'd been working for the majority of the time this game has been up, and after work Friday all that had happened was a relatively pointless conversation about when lylo would be and trying to direct when the hunter should shoot. I didn't feel the need to rush to talk and I needed some sleep for work, so I did that instead.


Was more making a joke than anything right. Just keep doing your thing, Freddeh.

Freddeh wrote:
Quote:
I was fishing and said as much. I have confirmed KoD's "poor logic." What's your excuse for employing it?


Yeah, yeah, on my re-read I noticed that. I still call it more trapping than fishing, due to reasons already outlined, but whatever.


The only way it could really be seen as trapping is if you think I'm scum and I was trying to get a townie to out their role. And if that's the case...Anyway, it wasn't trapping in the more traditional sense of me trying to put someone in a situation where if they respond without thinking it might out them as scum.

Freddeh wrote:
Quote:
I was a bit sad he was the one to jump on it, but, KoD is right that all it takes is one fool to ruin it. I was anticipating that most people knew how to play mafia, though, and it would spark some discussion. Which it did. Great success.


Which I thought was the obvious intent, and is why I was surprised that KoD was so gung ho over going after you hard for it.


You say you think that was the obvious intent and you want to call it trapping?

Freddeh wrote:
Quote:
Considering the lack of reaction by everyone else, I'm glad someone helped me get the ball rolling. It would be overreactionary if there was anything else going on, IMO, but its hard to overreact when there is nothing more pressing, again IMO.


It became overreactionary when he basically called everyone to action to lynch you.


When I vote for someone, in the majority of circumstances aside from pressure voting, it is because I want them lynched. Why is him voting me and urging the town to also vote for me overreactionary? Was voting me overreactionary?

Freddeh wrote:
Quote:
We should just not talk unless we have something to talk about then. Like D1, screw conversation. Nothing to talk about, we should just roll a dice and lynch someone.

Oh wait, no that's really dumb.

While certain lines of discussion can distract the town from scumhunting, that is certainly not the majority of discussion. Painting trying to get the ball rolling as unhelpful is just...I'm not sure what to call it. I can't think of a reason scum would try to attack discussion.


This shows you have absolutely no idea what I actually meant, so that's probably my fault. What I mean by 'great lengths' I mean stupid stuff like what JD and KoD argued about for like 2 pages of posts in the last game, something that both of them like to do on a regular basis. Obviously I don't mean we shouldn't talk about anything, that's just stupid.

Maybe I SHOULD just lurk this game, because I already have two people that love misrepresenting what I'm saying.


2 pages of argument doesn't prevent the rest of you from commenting or doing your own scumhunting. I will concede it becomes more difficult to keep track of the game the more incredibly active players there are, but discussion shouldn't be spat upon because it made it harder.

Freddeh wrote:
Quote:
@Rubik: Have you forgotten that its been the weekend since the game started actually having relevant discussion? Also, Neosilk doesn't deserve to be on that list, and PoPa does. Until recently Neo had done far more than me, and PoPa has done literally nothing. Setiny was at least a little active on Friday as well, so ruling him out over the first weekend strikes as overreactive as well.


Neo hadn't done all that much.

Freddeh wrote:
I mean, last game sucked and all, but thats no reason to force LaL as the first line of voting, especially when we're not more than THREE DAYS into the game. That said, I fully support LaL if there's a rather obvious lurker/active lurker by the end of the day, and nothing else super scummy otherwise, but stop calling out people that aren't even actually lurking and ignoring people that are.


Based on how the games I've glanced at on here seem to have gone and this previous game KoD keeps referring to, it does seem a LaL is in order.

Lilan wrote:
a policy lynch doesn't mean anything if you're not going to follow up on it

it's called lynch ALL lurkers for a reason

Also, the deadline is in two days. Day 1 is already more than half over.


I am not sure who you are agreeing/disagreeing with, but what you are saying is right, scumbuddy of my soul.

I can't get a read on you Niklor because of two things:
1.) The whole fishing thing has given me a tainted picture of you. After all, it's completely within the realm of possibility for an active scum to fish and hide behind a simple reason such as wanting to end the joke phase or wanting to get discussion rolling.


My own fault. I should play more cautiously, but that's not in my nature. Can definitely see where you're coming from.

2.) You've essentially sided with me against others who attacked me. So far Fred and Rubik have reacted against me. You've not only essentially sided with me, you've defended me on various fronts, and that throws me off because I can't tell if you truly agree with me, or, from a scum perspective, you're just buddying with me so I don't suspect you. Point is, I don't know what to do with you. (Although I won't forget that someone else agreed with me in a sense just not to the extent that you have -- Lilan.)


You seem an entirely reasonable person, KoD. So far, it's been hard to disagree with you. Again, can see where you're coming from though.

Nah, I'm going to lurk as much as normal.


I think our policy lynch has a pretty clear target.

Spoiler


Rubik wrote:
I agree with Neo's previous statement about your case on Niklor being weak (not necessarily the vote attached to the post nor the lack of elaboration, however). Sure your Niklor case was better than having literally no case, but not by much.


But in instances where there is essentially no other case, a weak case is much better than no case as if we kept sitting around having no cases on anyone, the game would probably flatline.

Rubik wrote:
I appreciate the quote, but I'm not going to vote him unless he fails to post anything meaningful. I think a Neo wagon is perfectly fine, but I'm still more interested in eliminating Zinger or Tiny at the moment unless Neo is lying about contributing.


Fair enough.

Lilan wrote:
For the record, I don't think Niklor was fishing, I think he was just making a funny comment on KoD's voting patterns. Day 1 cases have to start somewhere though.

Zinger completely ignoring the angry mob talking about him and making one post and then leaving strikes me as scummier than Neo disappearing after making a weak vote.


I made a funny comment and fished in the same post. Look at me now, Ma. I'm multitasking.

The problem is people don't always have the chance to digest everything and answer in a way that isn't putting their own foot in their mouth, not necessarily because they are lying scum. So, his lack of commentary on what was going on didn't bother me overly much. If he tried to come in later and ignore everything that happened. That would be scummy.

Rubik wrote:
Again: the case is flimsy because Niklor was fishing for entirely harmless information (there is no bastard mime role in this game). Anyone who would somehow slip up on something so minor would inevitably blunder anyways.


While that is probably true, the case can be made that even the most experienced player will make a slip every now and again. Otherwise, a veteran game of mafia would be almost random. I was fairly certain KoD wasn't going to pull a Mono and ruin the game for his faction, but it was a slight risk.

Rubik wrote:
There is always the possibility of misunderstanding, KoD. Communication is inherently imperfect. You can't more or less say "be sure everything you say cannot possibly be misinterpreted" because that would be essentially impossible for anything other than the most basic of exchanges.


You say that, yet argue that fishing for likely harmless information has no potential detriment as long as we don't have really bad players.

I made it to the next page for me. So I will take a break so my posts aren't too heavy.

_________________
"In the end, both heroes and villians are naught but furballs."

9:02 AM - Mown: Honestly though most anime characters don't look that anime.
4:06 AM: Grue: you can't put all ur problems on enchantments


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 5:13 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 23, 2014
Posts: 1106
Also to prevent the accidental closing of the tab and much agony at having to do it all again.

_________________
"In the end, both heroes and villians are naught but furballs."

9:02 AM - Mown: Honestly though most anime characters don't look that anime.
4:06 AM: Grue: you can't put all ur problems on enchantments


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 5:42 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Posts: 3058
Identity: Female
zinger is still a better target than PP though you and tiny are right. PP did slip past my radar and I'd like to see him elaborate on his lurking statement.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 5:50 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 23, 2014
Posts: 1106
NeoSilk wrote:
KoD - he clearly was making a joke about the mute - could you really imagine a game where someone couldn't talk - and you were trying to make it seem scummy.


First off, do you know what fishing is?

Second, if you think I was only making a joke, doesn't that make me a liar right now?

I ran out before a third, sadly.

NeoSilk wrote:
Honestly - I'm not that sure what to think right now. Meta discussions, jokes. With just 1 person, I'd think it's easier to hide even while staying active. I have no plans on being inactive this game. As you can see from my game history, I'm not that active on weekends, ever.


Don't try to be committed to what you signed up for or anything.

NeoSilk wrote:
It's D1, and there's one scum. Reasons are flimsy, especially to start. I find it funny that you were focusing on me, while others have votes flying around without any reasons. Feels a bit like a tunnel to me.


I'd like to see this tunnel you are referring to. It's not like KoD is ignoring other things going on around him to hunt you down.

NeoSilk wrote:
It's easy to hide by lurking, but it's also easy to hide by starting arguments.


So very, very true. The best place to hide is close to the spotlight.

Rubik wrote:
Sidenote: I've just gotten back in town. I've been having to post off of my phone for the past couple days. I should be able to quote posts more appropriately now that I can use a mouse and keyboard again.


I will personally say thanks for all your hard work. Thank you, Rubik, for being the active player.

I'm glad you asked Rubik, but first...

Of course there will be misunderstandings. Of course there will be mistakes. Are you using this as a reason to not act? Please, spare me. What matters is taking action. Taking no action because there may be a misunderstanding is a petty excuse.

Now, as for your tone.


Speaking of tone, I could practically hear KoD berating down from on high.

Established here are your views. You would prefer to scare lurkers into activity rather than kill them, and your view is that this should be done early and not delayed. You'd already prefer to deal with active scum rather than lurky scum.


I can't imagine preferring to deal with scum who lurk, but maybe that's just me.

And this is perfect because what do you do immediately thereafter? You jump behind Lilan for lynching Zinger and agree that he is the ideal lynch. All this despite the fact that he was your joke vote in the first place, but turned into a good person to lynch because lurker right? course, let's not forget that Zinger actually came in and contributed something despite how little it was. And, by your words, there were two others that were deadweight. What about Tiny? Of the three, he's contributed far less in quite a literal sense. Oh right, for some reason Zinger has your attention possibly because you're able to get behind other players who have decided to jump on his wagon, making him a safe one to go after.

This is what I mean about your tone. You contradict your own views because it benefits you.


I am having trouble following all that, though I would tend to agree Zinger, as of this post I am responding to anyway, was lurking. He may promise more in the future, but the future is uncertain. Contributions can also be seen differently, so I am not overly bothered over the vote on Zinger instead of another. I wouldn't personally pick him for the lurker vote, but he isn't a bad choice.

And just for emphasis:

Quote:
I'm not at all abandoning playing the game and I'm not suggesting that everyone just put their vote on lurkers and sit there. I do, however, think it's important that a few players keep voting pressure on lurkers to encourage them to post.

Zinger, NeoSilk, and SeTiny are all complete deadweight right now. I'd like them to read the thread and give their input on something relevant to the game or I'd like them to replace out for someone who will. There are slightly less lurky players who I'd also like to see more from, but none so bad as these first few.

If you think it's better to ignore the fact that players are lurking until just before the deadline and then kill them instead of giving them a chance to improve, that's your prerogative. It's not my fault that your strategy is bad.


Right. Keep pressure on them to get them to post. Yet even when they don't contribute as much as you seem to want, you'll want to kill them anyway. Quite the contradictory person you are.


That one is a bit shifty looking, though.

Rubik wrote:
Quote:
Oh look. Ironically Neo has come back and posted now as opposed to later. And all because I focused on him. Funny how that works. I'm definitely happy with my vote on him.


It could just as easily be because I said that I planned to vote for him if he didn't end up posting content. Or because he intended to do so in the first place. But no, it's got to be you and you alone. :)


Clearly, he posted so I could spam you all with my thoughts after getting a slight backlog built after Lilan showed me the MMO Blob Game.

I don't know why either of you think you had anything to do with it. :V

Lilan wrote:
Tiny has placed a vote too.

Zinger's vote on freddeh was certianly a joke vote referring to the rivalry the two have. Freddeh-scum is zinger's nickname for freddeh.

Zinger's post does not have any more content than most of tiny's, it just arrived later than scheduled.


Not everyone is aware of inside jokes, like me, so it appeared as if Zinger was casting a vote. Until he responds either way, I will assume it was serious.

NeoSilk wrote:
I'm scum cause I didn't post. Now I'm scum since I did?

Makes sense.


I personally think you are scum because you dye your fur blue.

seTiny wrote:
In Niklor's first response to KoD's accusation of he admits to fishing:
Niklor wrote:

He purposely tried fishing for role information with this post by playing dumb and looking for a reaction that would give him an idea as to the kind of role I might have.

[...edited out..] If I could get the ball rolling with a little casual fishing, why not?

Anyone else have some thoughts on my fishing? (As I type this, I see response. How pleasing.)


I've also seen a few posts saying that all the role-information has been given, and Niklor couldn't be fishing for information because of the second post. This was in the setup thread:

15377 wrote:
This game will feature a partial open set up. This means that all possible roles will be listed as part of the OP, but certain key features may be held private if the integrity of the game calls for it.


Emphasis mine. While I doubt a miming ability was part of ths game, 15377 said before the game even started that there could be some stuff left out. So Niklor could have, and admitted to fishing.


I could have been fishing even if the roles were entirely disclosed. Whether or not the setup is fully known doesn't prevent fishing for other's roles. In some respects, it would encourage it, especially if the one fishing is scum. I don't see why you only believe it was fishing if you believe some roles might be fully disclosed.

NeoSilk wrote:
I'm all for discussion, but, can someone honestly say that they believed that numbers would have a power role in this game that couldn't talk? Especially after scum lurked their way to victory last game?


I can't see that role being part of this game, but not because of previous games.

NeoSilk wrote:
I'm shocked that no one jumped on me for my suggestion that we might no lynch on D2. I was kind of throwing that out there to see who would react. I think it's pretty clear that we need to have a lynch today, especially since it could win the game. I am open to the idea of a no-lynch on D2, depending on what type of info we get on N1, especially if it looks like it might give another day. Remember, we do have 3 town power roles, which will hopefully provide us with some actual information over the next few days.


No lynch is not usually useful. Plus, considering the odds of someone converting to scum overnight and then potentially acting strangely in accordance to previous beliefs, a no lynch D-2 seems like a terrible idea.

NeoSilk wrote:
Personally, I like throwing out some questions here. Let's start with the guardsman - if that was you, who would you watch today, and why?

I'd watch Lilan - the copy/vote thing that she's doing seems odd - I can't believe it's a wolf move, since it seems way too suspicious, but it just seems...odd.


Lilan seems to be acting like Lilan, which isn't particularly helpful

Unless I have a strong inkling, I usually act with investigative roles somewhat randomly. Looking at the list, I'd probably choose to watch Lilan, because a part of me associates trying to not be right in the spotlight, but part of the discussion as either a scum or power role move. Which an investigation would likely turn up.

seTiny wrote:
NeoSilk wrote:
Personally, I like throwing out some questions here. Let's start with the guardsman - if that was you, who would you watch today, and why?


This seems like a good way to give the wolf information going into night 1. <insert fishing smiley>


This seems like a good way to give the wolf useless information going into night 1.

Ah, that's what the difference was.

I would have pointed out the fishing, but last game someone asked a similar question and they were town (I believe it was Ambar). Only difference though is that his question was in regards to who you would kill if you were mafia. Neo's question is about a town power role, and it certainly qualifies as fishing if only to avoid targeting likely Guardsman targets.


Obviously part of the Guardsman role could not be disclosed, but since he apparently checks if people used an ability during the night, I don't see why the wolf would need to avoid any target based on the likely Guardsman target.

Given the actual Guardsman, who might be me for all you know, could easily lie about who he wants to go for, I don't see much harm in putting this mostly useless information up front. If the wolf, who also might be me for all you know, wants to dance around trying to outwit our clever discussions about nothing, let him.

NeoSilk wrote:
Last game, asking that, I was trying to look for patterns across people I suspected as scum. For this one, there's only 1 scum now, so there's really no pattern. Really just trying to start a discussion on who's looking at who.


While you can't try to look for scum interacting with scum, you can certainly try to look for players trying to buddy up with another player. Town has no real reason to do this, but the wolf certainly does.

_________________
"In the end, both heroes and villians are naught but furballs."

9:02 AM - Mown: Honestly though most anime characters don't look that anime.
4:06 AM: Grue: you can't put all ur problems on enchantments


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 5:54 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 23, 2014
Posts: 1106
I am rather comfortable with where my vote lies, but will consider who to LaL tomorrow. Currently, thinking either Pariah or Zinger, with Pariah's clear refusal to not lurk being the more problematic post for me as necessitates a policy lynch.

_________________
"In the end, both heroes and villians are naught but furballs."

9:02 AM - Mown: Honestly though most anime characters don't look that anime.
4:06 AM: Grue: you can't put all ur problems on enchantments


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 11:20 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 5149
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Identity: Spider-Man
Preferred Pronoun Set: Wtf is a "Jabber address"?
15377 wrote:
You could Neo, but that bar maiden is quite promiscuous and likes to bite so...
Soooo... Can I chat up the bar maiden? I mean, I know there is a werewolf running around and all and this might not be the best time, but dammit I could die tonight! Is it so wrong to be thinking of baser needs in circumstances as these? :P

Oh you think so Neo? Do explain to me how asking if someone is mute in this game is a relevant question to this particular game?

Way I see it, asking that kind of question and answering it a certain way would reveal to the werewolf who has what kind of role.
There aren't any mute roles. This is a partially open setup in that we know the roles that are out there already. Niklor can't be fishing for something that everyone in the game aught to know doesn't exist. Did you not read the OP?

Lilan wrote:
he is my ideal lynch for today and that will probably not change until he starts contributing
Cute. Have a :cookie:.

Niklor wrote:
I'm sure I can guess any number of reasons you find Freddeh scummy, but could you elaborate a little on it.

For your NLP: Have you ever worn a Tutu?
Freddeh-scum is a nickname I gave him years ago on Px2 because I enjoyed bantering with him and Freddeh-scum just rolls off the tongue so easily, you can't help but smile as you say it! :V I don't particularly find him scummy this game, but I do so enjoy dropping a vote on him as soon as the game starts cuz it's fun to do, and the fact that he was voting me before I even had a chance to see the game was in full swing didn't dissuade me from doing so any. Plus, third person on a bandwagon is usually scum, according to some mafia theory somewhere on the internets, and I think he was around three... maybe. :P It was my first post in the game, what do I need a reason for? I'm still in my own personal random voting stage so, mind your own business! It was just to get Freddeh-scum to notice me anyway. lol

Oh, and while my NLP doesn't apply to anything not in-game related, I will proudly say that I have never had the honour of sporting a tutu. It's on my bucket list, though.

Lilan wrote:
Zinger completely ignoring the angry mob talking about him and making one post and then leaving strikes me as scummier than Neo disappearing after making a weak vote.
This ain't my first rodeo, pal. Angry mob was pissed that I hadn't posted. The best response to such an angry mob is to just start posting and see what happens. Generally, most will drop their votes at that point, and any that don't are putting a spotlight on themselves for being overly aggressive with little justification. Either way, win-win for me. :bored:

This is why I fully believe that Neo is the wolf as he fits what I consider to be a scum's safe approach to playing the game.
It's Day 1. There's been very little discussion and even less facts to throw around. You're looking at a 1 in 8 shot in the dark. It's a crap shoot no matter which way you look at it, and yet you are fully convinced you know who the wolf is? Scummiest thing you've said all Day, KoD.

course, let's not forget that Zinger actually came in and contributed something despite how little it was.
Lilan wrote:
And Zinger's post didn't have any content in it.
It was my first post of the game, give me a break. Joke phase might have been over for you, but as my first post of the game I think joke phase still applied to me. And if you think otherwise, well, you just don't have a sense of humour! :P

Rubik wrote:
I voted for Zinger during the joke vote phase because I wanted to get a reaction from one of the few (if not the only) players who had yet to post in the thread.
Hi. :hand:

Rubik wrote:
Zinger's recent "contribution" was literally nothing more than a delayed joke phase post,
Thank you.

On the contrary Rubik. He has contributed. He just hasn't expanded upon what he's done so far. I believe Niklor was the one who asked Zinger to expand on what he said. In case you don't get what I'm saying here, his vote on Fred is content in and of itself. Further explanation on why he has done so helps though.
:lol:

Unvote

Seriously, I wouldn't even call my vote on Freddeh-scum to be content. You shouldn't either. Get real, man. You're beating a dead horse.

Vote: KindgomofDominaria

Now my vote on you, on the other hand, I would call content.

Lilan wrote:
Tiny has placed a vote too.

Zinger's vote on freddeh was certianly a joke vote referring to the rivalry the two have. Freddeh-scum is zinger's nickname for freddeh.

Zinger's post does not have any more content than most of tiny's, it just arrived later than scheduled.
:teach:

Rubik wrote:
Bolded content: Tiny did some early day joke posts, Zinger did a late day joke vote. The former is someone being absent during a period of interest and not yet returning, the latter is a case of someone arriving after meaningful discussion and still having absolutely nothing to add to the conversation.
Now you're just being harsh. I had things to add to the conversation, but being a late arrival to the game in general surely I was allowed to take some time to formulate what I had to add into complete thoughts and sentences, yes? I hadn't even read the thread at the time I made my first post. Sheesh.

Also, I'll take Zinger arriving at face value then for the sake of this next part. If that is the case, I can't even call him a lurker since he's just started playing the game in a literal sense. This means he has quite a few pages to sift through and actually give an opinion on. All you're doing now is putting him to death despite not even having had as much time as others, say Tiny for example, to contribute.
This is the first amount of logical sense you've made all game, which begs the question: if you've had all this time to be making sense, why did you only start making sense now? Hmm? Probably because 90% of what you've had to say was lycanthrope fueled BS. But hey, at least you've realized my lack of content was from arriving late to the table. Good job.

15377 wrote:
Rubik wrote:
@Numbers: Can the doctor prevent someone from being sired?


A better question, what makes you think I'll answer this? :teach:
Alternatively, Rubik could try asking the Doctor to answer this question. :party:

seTiny wrote:
I've played with Zinger before and his current level of inactivity is odd, but he's always been one of the active ones. Pariah seems content on being a lurker whether or not he's mafia or town. If we were to lynch a lurker I think Pariah makes a better target.
New job will do that. I'm a Fire Ranger now! Plus, my real life name is Josh, which makes this image incredibly funny:
Image

Lilan wrote:
zinger is still a better target than PP though you and tiny are right. PP did slip past my radar and I'd like to see him elaborate on his lurking statement.
[/quote]I'm really not, though.


And with that I am all caught up!


-----------------------------------------


Lots to go on. I personally am of the belief the wolf is trying to hide in plain sight. I doubt the lurkers are the wolf for this reason. Of the more active players, KoD is the one that strikes me as the wolfiest of the pack, with his arguments that seem more contrived than stumbled upon. Didn't help that a few things he said really rubbed me the wrong way. Anyone who is sure of anything Day 1 knows more than he's letting on.

_________________
well played zinger


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 11:26 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Posts: 3058
Identity: Female
good to have you here zinger

less than 24 hours to deadline so lets see who else is on my list

Unvote, Vote: Popular Pariah

Contributed a little while meta and math were still the primary discussions. Hasn't shown up since people have actually started throwing cases at each other, and said that he intends to lurk as much as he normally does. Seems like a good enough place to put my vote.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 11, 2015 11:38 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 5149
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Identity: Spider-Man
Preferred Pronoun Set: Wtf is a "Jabber address"?
Lilan wrote:
good to have you here zinger
:hattip:

Would have been here sooner if it had been possible.

_________________
well played zinger


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 12:00 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Aug 05, 2014
Posts: 6083
Location: Here. Always.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion Zinger. Even if it is stupid.

That being said, D1 or not, I have reason to believe Neo is the wolf.

As for what amounts to content from you, until you came here to claim otherwise, I had no reason to believe what you offered was not content. You saying otherwise now does little to change my mind about my opinion then; even in hindsight, too, my opinion remains unchanged.

As for you question about why I started making sense now -- maybe it's because you're bad at recognizing good logic even when it is in front of you? I won't hold that against you though since I've already got my sights set on Neo for now. You're welcome to take a ticket and stand in line though. I'll get around to you eventually.

_________________
Spoiler


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 12:04 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 31, 2015
Posts: 2574
Location: California
Identity: Rubik
Vote: Popular Pariah

Post your opinions or die. :)


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 1:06 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 25, 2013
Posts: 2891
Preferred Pronoun Set: Please don't refer to me
Lilan wrote:
zinger is still a better target than PP though you and tiny are right. PP did slip past my radar and I'd like to see him elaborate on his lurking statement.

I'm lurking.


Clarified.

_________________
A light in the darkness, trying to hide.


Winner of the 1st NGA Constructed Super League: PopularPariah


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 1:10 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 25, 2013
Posts: 2891
Preferred Pronoun Set: Please don't refer to me
Don't have any opinions yet.

_________________
A light in the darkness, trying to hide.


Winner of the 1st NGA Constructed Super League: PopularPariah


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 1:11 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 25, 2013
Posts: 2891
Preferred Pronoun Set: Please don't refer to me
Vote: Niklor

_________________
A light in the darkness, trying to hide.


Winner of the 1st NGA Constructed Super League: PopularPariah


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 1:11 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Posts: 3058
Identity: Female
why


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 1:13 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 25, 2013
Posts: 2891
Preferred Pronoun Set: Please don't refer to me
It's what I do brocookie

_________________
A light in the darkness, trying to hide.


Winner of the 1st NGA Constructed Super League: PopularPariah


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 1:16 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 27, 2013
Posts: 3058
Identity: Female
i meant why vote niklor


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 1:19 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 25, 2013
Posts: 2891
Preferred Pronoun Set: Please don't refer to me
No particular reason.

_________________
A light in the darkness, trying to hide.


Winner of the 1st NGA Constructed Super League: PopularPariah


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 1:19 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Aug 05, 2014
Posts: 6083
Location: Here. Always.
You should probably contribute way more than the below the minimum that you're trying to offer. Otherwise the people who want lurker blood will have it.

_________________
Spoiler


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 12, 2015 1:20 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Dec 25, 2013
Posts: 2891
Preferred Pronoun Set: Please don't refer to me
I really want to vote zinger because he's always a piece of garbage.


Meh, I really don't have time to read the thread yet so w/e.

_________________
A light in the darkness, trying to hide.


Winner of the 1st NGA Constructed Super League: PopularPariah


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 502 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 26  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group