@Lilan: I'll pull up the two relevant posts.
NumbersQuote:
I know you bro.
The wagon on Ahl Ambar reeks of classic Day 1 wagon on town. Has from the start. I'm surprised people are still jumping on it. Well maybe not Confused. But we are less than 48 hours in and Ambar is sitting at L-2. Clearly if we want to find scum today, we just need to look to the five that are on this wagon, as at least one of them is likely to be scum.
KoDQuote:
Of course I'd be in a game with a bunch of people I've played with before. Ahylis just puts the icing on the cake for me.
I have a problem with your post JD (Numbers, but I'll refer to him as JD).
My problem is that you invoked, within your post, the idea that we will likely lynch town as opposed to mafia. I have no stats to speak of, but I'm sure, in general, people will agree when I say that it is true town gets lynched first instead of mafia.
That being said, this is not a law that holds true in all cases. In our particular case, Ahylis ( Ambar , assuming Ambar really is Ahylis) could be the unfortunate mafia scum that will get lynched first.
Only way to know is if he is lynched.
But that isn't the heart of the problem for me. The heart of it is that in bringing this up JD you tactfully neglected to offer more on the thought. Yes, perhaps Ambar really is town. Perhaps one of is voting him is scum. Why, then, not offer more on what you brought up?
My guess is that, assuming from strict paranoia, you could be scum trying to steer the lynch away from your partner in scum. Buy that is only a guess.
The main thing is that you have thrown before us something that will give us pause when considering it. And you've offered nothing else. Just the bare minimum. I find that to be awfully scummy of you.
Notes:
1) My comments towards JD focus on what I consider to be subtle things. If Numbers truly is JD, then I'll give no ground in my thoughts when considering his words for he is skilled at the art of mafia.
2) In regards to what was brought up by JD on Ambar, it could be applied to any wagon that pops up to this point. If such a wagon were developing on a scum, it wouldn't take much for scum to vote their own partner and make an argument, similar to JD's, about it.
At the end of the day though, it'll be speculation until someone is dead. Ambar's death will definitely give some connections. But the same is true of Lilian if she is lynched. Either of these two I am personally ok with dying. If more people keep talking to offer more opinions on what has been brought up, then I may change my mind should what is said be enlightening.
Those are the two posts.
Start with Number's first.
By the time of his post, five votes have accumulated on Ambar. His assessment: Ambar's wagon smells like a wagon on town, and it is likely scum is on that wagon. Look at the people on that wagon.
Now move to my wordy post which follows immediately close to his.
My post boils down to two things only. Number's assertion that Ambar's wagon is a wagon on town, and Number's lack of contributing more to the very people he seeks to cast suspicion on.
Now, when Ambar posted recently asking that we continue talking, all I did was revisit my own reasoning on Numbers. So no, Lilan, it isn't because Numbers, as you put, "defended" Ambar so much so as his roundabout way of "defending" Ambar by proclaiming that the wagon feels like a wagon on town and saying we should scumhunt on the people voting him yet not actually scumhunting himself.
Now, to make a connection.
JDQuote:
No, KoD is asserting I'm scum because he knows how I interact with people. He knows I'm intentionally antagonizing him because I think he's scum. That's why he's been extremely defensive about his Ambar vote and is now lashing out against me. Note his reason is that I'm not offering insights, yet my earlier vote was on an Ambar wagoner. While my next vote was placed in jest to do the above mentioned antagonizing, it is currently on an Ambar wagoner and hasn't moved because of that reason.
There's several things to note here. Some personal, others more general.
I'll start with the personal. Number's asserts that I know he is antagonizing him because I think he thinks I'm scum (this is going to get convoluted quick so I'll stop it right here). That couldn't be farther from the truth. If he's being antagonistic towards me, it is beyond me why he is aside from the most obvious reason in that he disagrees with me just as I disagree with him over many things. You need not look far into many of our posts to find such disagreements from me voiced towards him.
Now since he brought up my Ambar vote, let's talk about it. Here is the main thing everyone should look at when Numbers speaks about people voting Ambar. He isn't specific. He speaks very broadly in regards to the Ambar wagon and how the reasons are lack luster. Not worthy enough to warrant votes. It isn't until much later after much disagreement with me that it is I who he has focused on. As if it was a great trap set for scumhunting that he devised.
Finally, him not offering insights. I'm not sure what he is imagining, but remember my short conversation with Ambar about how giving any reason is not as good as giving no reason at all? I brought up an example, since we were all talking of Lilan at that point, that was mentioned by MoD I believe. Vote because blue eyes. Hardly helpful right? In my example, I mentioned vote because "reasons". After which, as Numbers says, he made a jest post voting MoD because "reasons". How that is supposed to be antagonizing to me idk since I never even addressed it. Truth be told there was no reason to address it since Numbers wasn't exactly involved in what was going on like most others.
So yeah, he hasn't offered insights. It is more like he is taking an opportunity to use the disagreement I have with him as his way of contributing even though he's offered nothing else on anyone else and is still focused on maintaining an argument with me rather than speaking about others. A perfect distraction/excuse from having to contribute more than is necessary if one were scum.