Yeah, I'd like to see that rule changed. It would end the dumbest aspect of the game, which is good. It would also lead the meta towards teambuilding which I am unsettled on.

This guy gets it.

To be clear, you want what rule changed to what?

Nom... Not chomp.

Don't want to expose myself to an online user's chomp, and don't want to repay kindness (I think Shocky helped me, to lazy to check) with violence, but must respond...

What I want: If you counter-chomp the user who chomped you, you get back whatever points you lost when that user chomped you. Or I guess, the loss might not be officialized until a third user posts and ends the possibility of the counter-chomp-chain continuing. Effectively it's the same thing; it's just the book keeping that changes.

Chomp!

*Waits for ruling*

Chomps, but sort of tentatively.

So, something like this?

Player A has 2 points
Player B has 0 points

Posts:

Player A
Player B
Player A
Player B
Player A
Player B
Player A
Player C

Player A now has 3 points and player B has no points?

Or, alternatively, if player B had the last post in the counter-chomp chain, Player A now has 0 points and player B has 1 point.

Yep. (and chomp)

I wonder how the development team is taking this criticism.

We won't know until an announcement is made.

Gotta protect TP.

Cuz when you work in the bush, like me, TP is an essential resource. XD

Zing!

When do I get hungry?

Enlighten me.

I think I understand. 48 hours with no posting from yourself.

I totally forgot about that bit.

Nom chomps.

Agh! Chomp.

Go for the combo TP.