It is currently Wed Dec 04, 2024 3:12 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 578 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 29  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 7:07 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 31, 2013
Posts: 1749
Or you know, Alt might be waiting for some prompting. Actively seeking out more information about the puzzle, could be the puzzle? Which is specifically why Im bringing it up, in the hope we get more information, as a result of talking about it.

And as I've said a few times now, within the context of a D1 mass claim, its unverifiable. Presumably the only people who can know more than their own individual role, before night, is the mafia. Is the role unverified, in the big picture? Yes, definitely, Obviously! Is the role verifiable during a D1 mass claim? No. The only true results a day 1 mass claim can produce are internal. As in 'I know that guy is probably lying, because he said my role!' Otherwise, D1 claims are unverifiable within D1.

I'd love to establish you're a town aligned cop. But its impossible for that to be shown either way right now. Right now, its someone waving a flag around and saying 'Now everyone line up and tick the box for me, so I can compare it with my future secret results!'

And lets extend that, right now, you've claimed cop. That means you could be a cop, and survive the night thanks to a doctor saving you, or scaring the mafia into targeting elsewhere to avoid a doctor. Or you could not be a town aligned, survive the night thanks to not offing yourself, then pick a town at random, call vanilla and hope the NGA vanilla heavy trend holds true.

Honestly the fact you're saying 'Im a cop' and then jumping on someone who is prepared to say 'But yeah, you might be, or you might be lying.' is iffy to me. Any town should know to take everything with a grain of salt, especially day one.

And if you arent a cop, and one does speak up, it devolves into he said/she said.
So yes, you might be a cop. But you might not be, hence the concern about posturing. A D1 cop claim means the waters are muddied if you're not on the level.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 7:09 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 31, 2013
Posts: 1749
Alt posted while I did, so thats awkward...

Now to determine whether 'I have this on record' is him taking offense at my jab, or acknowledging that the puzzle is being sought out....

:P


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 9:11 am 
Offline
PBP Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Dec 23, 2013
Posts: 1270
15377 wrote:
To those that oppose the mass claim, Scar and PopPa, tradition isn't winning games for town. When something doesn't work, it's time to try a new tactic. Be more flexible.

You know as well as I do, or at least I hope since I've been playing this game for over a decade now, that tradition has nothing to do with the reason why I'm against it.

As you said yourself, the doc will pretty much never come forward, so the notion of getting all the role-information of the game is flawed from the get-go.
Additionally the mind-game between probable doc and mafia, whilst fun on its own, can and often does lead to a very lazy town who waits for the cop(variant) to give information.
Mass-claims very rarely lead to more discussion after they're done. On the contrary, the player base here so far has shown that if it can lean on power roles, it will do so.
And a silent town in the early days is bound to lose in the last ones.

I must say, I don't think I have almost never seen a power role claim in the appropriate time on this site (a severe wagon heading your way, yet timely so it can be steered away, or a mathematically correct cop (even a certain amount of town results and no scums is a good claim at a certain point during the game)). And mass claims are imo never a good time.

_________________
Moderator of the PbP-area.
Creating and playing forum games and Mafia since 2004.

Will you play with me? It only costs one coin.
Because when we're done, you won't continue!

--Flandre Scarlet, Touhou Project 6.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 9:42 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Nov 23, 2014
Posts: 1106
So, it appears the mass claim idea is dead in the water with a good portion of the town opposing it. I will freely admit a part of the reason I want one to happen is to be able to lean on it. I've never understood why there is the whole negativity associated with wanting to use the tools available to us just because doing so might make some players more comfortable and less likely to seriously play. Yes, some people will probably be content if we use the mass claim to rely on whatever claimed power roles we have, but that is no reason to complete paint it like nothing useful can come about because of it.

If we're worried about a silent town, prod and poke and threaten to vote people or just policy lynch until people actually start showing up with the intent to play and discuss and scumhunt. Don't argue we shouldn't massclaim because some people might sit on their rears afterwards.

On a side note, the whole Neo dragging unrelated stuff from prior games leaves a bad taste in my mouth. It's nothing that my suspicions rise much, but the whole pointless discussion that it generated felt more like an attempt to be active.

_________________
"In the end, both heroes and villians are naught but furballs."

9:02 AM - Mown: Honestly though most anime characters don't look that anime.
4:06 AM: Grue: you can't put all ur problems on enchantments


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 10:28 am 
Offline
Desperately Wants A Custom Title
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 4754
Identity: Man
Elijin wrote:
Alt posted while I did, so thats awkward...

Now to determine whether 'I have this on record' is him taking offense at my jab, or acknowledging that the puzzle is being sought out....

:P


Oh, the gauntlets are off :p

Also, I remember what I forgot to mention.
No editing, and to unvote you need to bold (colored is prefered)
EDIT: I can edit :p

VOTES (5 to lynch)
(1) NeoSilk - 15377


DAY ENDS: 117.5 hours from this post

_________________
quotes wrote:
squinty_eyes: Alt, you have fantastic logic. And zero political prowess.
CKY: Through a convoluted series of events involving three tons of garden gnomes and a pickup truck, Henderson’s Magikarp defeats the Deoxys terrorizing the city.

My Cube | My Designs | My Art
Silver Soraka Main


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 11:43 am 
Offline
PBP Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Dec 23, 2013
Posts: 1270
Niklor wrote:
So, it appears the mass claim idea is dead in the water with a good portion of the town opposing it. I will freely admit a part of the reason I want one to happen is to be able to lean on it. I've never understood why there is the whole negativity associated with wanting to use the tools available to us just because doing so might make some players more comfortable and less likely to seriously play. Yes, some people will probably be content if we use the mass claim to rely on whatever claimed power roles we have, but that is no reason to complete paint it like nothing useful can come about because of it.


There is fine line between using tools and abusing tools.

And though I don't like mass claims in general, I have nothing against them in the mid-game. But for a day one?
Heck, the only information that would realistically be gotten from a mass claim this early is the existence of a cop-variant (everyone who does not want their role to be known will just claim vanilla). And we already know that. So what exactly is the point of a mass claim again?

_________________
Moderator of the PbP-area.
Creating and playing forum games and Mafia since 2004.

Will you play with me? It only costs one coin.
Because when we're done, you won't continue!

--Flandre Scarlet, Touhou Project 6.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:36 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Aug 05, 2014
Posts: 6083
Location: Here. Always.
Numbers wants to lock people into what they say now so that if, in the future, he finds them lying it is a sure-sign they are mafia. With exception to the doc -- who he encourages to lie for obvious reasons.

I, honestly, don't see the big deal. If you're for a mass claim, well that's that. You'll participate. If you're against a mass claim, you don't have to claim. Numbers already went gun-ho and claimed without forcing others to claim. If you want to participate, you're free to do so.

@Lilan: There is no benefit to having an open doc. Open cop sure, if you trust them.

_________________
Spoiler


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2015 5:06 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 1468
Location: America's Wang
Identity: Numerical
@Eli, there's more than a few fundamental problems with your logic. First is that you assume you know how everybody's roles function. This is the only scenario in which you can actually claim to know that the roles cannot be verified today. As I've pointed out you have no probable way of knowing everybody's roles and thus cannot justify your claim. It is, as you say, unverifiable.

Secondly, you're trying to place this mass claim in a pocket bubble. The flaw in this logic is that a pocket bubble can be set up anywhere. Let's say day 4 I claim as an alignment cop. I say Bob, Sue, and Carl are town. I have no scum results. Am I verified? No. Can I verify my role that day? No. Does this mean I should not claim that day? No. You can never look at anything in a pocket bubble in mafia. Doing so only benefits the mafia who want to disjoint and contort information.

Third, you're not taking anything with a grain of salt. You're actively trying to deny the flow of information, as I pointed out earlier. You've responded to that with "Maybe Alt needs prompting" while actively ignoring that I already did just that netting no new information.

@Scar, you assume the point of the exercise is to figure the game out in the first day. That assumption is wrong. I am using the tools in my tool bag to scum hunt to the best of my ability. My actions, however, are not in convention, which is probably a more correct term than tradition.

@KoD, you always get me. <3

_________________
This is a signature.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 12:22 pm 
Offline
PBP Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Dec 23, 2013
Posts: 1270
I'm sure you use it as a scum hunt tool. But I am warning for the other side of the mass claim coin.
This will not be able to be used as information on the roles and everyone does need to be reminded of that before it's used in the wrong way. After all, 2-3 people will probably be lying.

_________________
Moderator of the PbP-area.
Creating and playing forum games and Mafia since 2004.

Will you play with me? It only costs one coin.
Because when we're done, you won't continue!

--Flandre Scarlet, Touhou Project 6.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:28 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 1468
Location: America's Wang
Identity: Numerical
"2-3 will lie, this invalidates every claim that will be made."

Yeah I don't believe for a second that you believe that statement either. The fact of the matter is that claiming today will be no different than claiming day 4. So unless your stance is mass claims should never be done, then your argument is invalid. The information gathered today will only be verified or denied in later stages of the game. To say that we won't be able to figure out if an individual is lying or not later on is a completely unjustifiable statement, and in most cases completely untrue.

Here's an argument I haven't seen any of the against people try to tackle, forcing a claim this early forces mafia to lie before they have a chance to figure out the game, making their lie more succeptable to being contridicted later in the game. Please reconcile.

_________________
This is a signature.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 1:43 pm 
Offline
PBP Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Dec 23, 2013
Posts: 1270
Quote:
"2-3 will lie, this invalidates every claim that will be made."
Don't put words in my mouth, thank you. I always play by Occam's razor until a contradiction happens. Right now I'm playing with the thought that you are a cop variant in mind.

I also said that I play by LaL. So yeah, having 25-33% of the players lie is kind of a deal breaker for me.

Quote:
Here's an argument I haven't seen any of the against people try to tackle, forcing a claim this early forces mafia to lie before they have a chance to figure out the game, making their lie more succeptable to being contridicted later in the game. Please reconcile.

>Vanilla
Now what.

Your 'it doesn't matter which day it is done' is also slightly flawed.
If a certain cop variant has a result that counters a vanilla claim, claiming time matters.
Now that a cop variant is claimed, the odds of a certain slip actually happening has decreased, because mafia can keep the existence of a variant in their mind when they make up their fake claims.
However, if cop claims late, after others have claimed, catching them in lies is immediate and there is nothing mafia can do against it, because they would not know of the cop's existence.

_________________
Moderator of the PbP-area.
Creating and playing forum games and Mafia since 2004.

Will you play with me? It only costs one coin.
Because when we're done, you won't continue!

--Flandre Scarlet, Touhou Project 6.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:01 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Aug 05, 2014
Posts: 6083
Location: Here. Always.
Vanilla exactly.

If everyone really felt like claiming, mafia could just be honest and claim exactly what they are (as in vanilla with no special power) thereby making it impossible to tell if they are lying if the cop is able to tell they are lying by roles.

Stances and conversation aside, here is a serious question (directed at Numbers). So far, you're the only one to have claimed. You've got some people who are against mass claiming. So, for the question, how are you going to go about getting claims if they don't want to claim? I ask this because it seems like a serious waste to claim like you have now rather than later as outlined by Scarlet.

_________________
Spoiler


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 4:45 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 1468
Location: America's Wang
Identity: Numerical
Don't put words in my mouth, thank you. I always play by Occam's razor until a contradiction happens. Right now I'm playing with the thought that you are a cop variant in mind.


Let's see, you said the other side of the mass claim coin was that the role information gathered from that would not be able to be used "after all 2-3 people will be lying." Seems like you're saying exactly what I said to me. Perhaps you'd like to rephrase to better clarify your position?

Quote:
I also said that I play by LaL. So yeah, having 25-33% of the players lie is kind of a deal breaker for me.


A typical mafia game runs 25% mafia. So in a typical mafia game if you mass claimed Day 1, that's a minimum of 25% potential liars. If you mass claim in LyLo with no dead scum you're looking at numbers closer to 50% (with the specific number being determined by the number of players of the game). So you're advocating that you don't believe in mass claims ever now then, ja?

Quote:
Quote:
Here's an argument I haven't seen any of the against people try to tackle, forcing a claim this early forces mafia to lie before they have a chance to figure out the game, making their lie more succeptable to being contridicted later in the game. Please reconcile.

>Vanilla
Now what.


Tracker targets you and sees your not vanilla. You've been caught in a lie. But had the mass claim happened later and you knew beforehand there was a tracker, you'd know not to claim a role that doesn't have a targeting function. Thanks for proving my point.

Quote:
Your 'it doesn't matter which day it is done' is also slightly flawed.
If a certain cop variant has a result that counters a vanilla claim, claiming time matters.
Now that a cop variant is claimed, the odds of a certain slip actually happening has decreased, because mafia can keep the existence of a variant in their mind when they make up their fake claims.
However, if cop claims late, after others have claimed, catching them in lies is immediate and there is nothing mafia can do against it, because they would not know of the cop's existence.


Claiming time doesn't matter. What matters is the liars knowledge before his claim. Scum aren't dumb. They are going to assume there's some kind of cop in the game. So to claim they'd screw up a lie because they assumed there wasn't a cop is just poor logic. I get the impression that you're not really paying attention to things though. Yes, I have claimed to be some kind of cop. Again, this isn't going to grant scum magical lying powers just knowing there's a cop of some kind in the game, it's a safe assumption on their part 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999% of the time. I have not revealed what kind of cop I am though. So you see, forcing them to claim now puts them into the exact position of lack of knowledge that you're claiming can only be achieved by pretending there's no cop for days upon days and then letting them claim. The difference here is they have to do it quick, they have to do it when they weren't prepared, and they have to do it knowing that I'm going to be scrutinizing their claim in a method they will not be able to decipher before they are forced to claim. So tell me again how it's better to pretend there's no cop until near game end, hope he lives, and then hope scum claim before he does just so you can catch them in a lie because you think they'll think there's no cop in the game.

@KoD: As I stated earlier, I was already considering a Day 1 claim regardless of the mass claim suggestion. It has actually not had much influence upon my decision to claim. It does, however, allow me a direct method of pressuring people into making them talk when they'd otherwise say nothing for the better part of the day (such as Scar usually does).

_________________
This is a signature.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 5:51 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Aug 05, 2014
Posts: 6083
Location: Here. Always.
That doesn't quite answer my question, unless you fully intended to say that pressuring was your answer to people not claiming to get them to claim.

_________________
Spoiler


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 18, 2015 6:19 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 1468
Location: America's Wang
Identity: Numerical
I intended to say that you've misunderstood my intentions in claiming. It isn't a waste because it was never aimed at a mass claim or forcing other people to claim. In the context of a mass claim I have undermined one of the fundamental arguments against a mass claim, yes, but not to force the issue, but rather to force those taking the easy way out to come up with viable justifications for trying to shut down a mass claim.

Suffice to say, I won't sweat it if nobody else claims. The exchange itself has already proven far more valuable in terms of scum hunting than the random Day 1 banter that would have taken place. That is not to say, though, that I wouldn't like to see the mass claim.

_________________
This is a signature.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 8:48 am 
Offline
PBP Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Dec 23, 2013
Posts: 1270
15377 wrote:
Don't put words in my mouth, thank you. I always play by Occam's razor until a contradiction happens. Right now I'm playing with the thought that you are a cop variant in mind.


Let's see, you said the other side of the mass claim coin was that the role information gathered from that would not be able to be used "after all 2-3 people will be lying." Seems like you're saying exactly what I said to me. Perhaps you'd like to rephrase to better clarify your position?
Those were 2 separate points in 2 separate posts. I have no idea why you mashed them together, but when you actually read them separate they make sense.

1) You said I thought I was going against the mass claim because of game information. To which I said that in this meta, people have shown to take information like that for granted (especially with a cop) and town becomes lazy and silent, so they lose.

2) After that point, you went ahead on the 'lie' part. To which I replied that 25-33% will definitely lie and mathematically, it is possible that more than that percentage do so.

However, neither of these points are arguments against "every claim ever" like you said I would've said. They are solely grounds for concern regarding mass claims on early days.
Heck, I even said that because of my play style, I'm trusting your claim for now.

Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Here's an argument I haven't seen any of the against people try to tackle, forcing a claim this early forces mafia to lie before they have a chance to figure out the game, making their lie more succeptable to being contridicted later in the game. Please reconcile.

>Vanilla
Now what.


Tracker targets you and sees your not vanilla. You've been caught in a lie. But had the mass claim happened later and you knew beforehand there was a tracker, you'd know not to claim a role that doesn't have a targeting function. Thanks for proving my point.

Quote:
Your 'it doesn't matter which day it is done' is also slightly flawed.
If a certain cop variant has a result that counters a vanilla claim, claiming time matters.
Now that a cop variant is claimed, the odds of a certain slip actually happening has decreased, because mafia can keep the existence of a variant in their mind when they make up their fake claims.
However, if cop claims late, after others have claimed, catching them in lies is immediate and there is nothing mafia can do against it, because they would not know of the cop's existence.


Claiming time doesn't matter. What matters is the liars knowledge before his claim. Scum aren't dumb. They are going to assume there's some kind of cop in the game. So to claim they'd screw up a lie because they assumed there wasn't a cop is just poor logic. I get the impression that you're not really paying attention to things though. Yes, I have claimed to be some kind of cop. Again, this isn't going to grant scum magical lying powers just knowing there's a cop of some kind in the game, it's a safe assumption on their part 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999% of the time. I have not revealed what kind of cop I am though. So you see, forcing them to claim now puts them into the exact position of lack of knowledge that you're claiming can only be achieved by pretending there's no cop for days upon days and then letting them claim. The difference here is they have to do it quick, they have to do it when they weren't prepared, and they have to do it knowing that I'm going to be scrutinizing their claim in a method they will not be able to decipher before they are forced to claim. So tell me again how it's better to pretend there's no cop until near game end, hope he lives, and then hope scum claim before he does just so you can catch them in a lie because you think they'll think there's no cop in the game.
I'll take these 2 together, because the tracker/watcher was exactly what I had in mind.

An average mafiate in a small game will not think of the tracker/watcher. Especially the less experienced players will just keep a 'normal' cop in mind. Therefor, there is a chance they slip up when they do not account a tracker.
However, because you did not claim cop, but you claimed cop variant, you already came out and said 'hey, remember that tracker is a thing!', so you removed the chance for the slip-up.
Timing matters.

_________________
Moderator of the PbP-area.
Creating and playing forum games and Mafia since 2004.

Will you play with me? It only costs one coin.
Because when we're done, you won't continue!

--Flandre Scarlet, Touhou Project 6.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 9:20 pm 
Offline
Desperately Wants A Custom Title
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 4754
Identity: Man
Lilan is being hydronified.
Lilan has expressed concern about keeping up with the game. I have contacted Rubik and together we have come to a conclusion that they will be a hydra player.
Lilan = Rubik
Rubik = Lilan
They will both act as one player.

==xx==

VOTES (5 to lynch)
(1) NeoSilk - 15377


DAY ENDS: 58.5 hours from this post

_________________
quotes wrote:
squinty_eyes: Alt, you have fantastic logic. And zero political prowess.
CKY: Through a convoluted series of events involving three tons of garden gnomes and a pickup truck, Henderson’s Magikarp defeats the Deoxys terrorizing the city.

My Cube | My Designs | My Art
Silver Soraka Main


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 11:27 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 31, 2015
Posts: 2574
Location: California
Identity: Rubik
Hello!

I think mass claiming is a terrible idea unless people have a solid reason for doing so.

Here is me debating with Lilan about massclaiming


I am going to vote for the player who, to me, felt the least like he was saying anything today.

Vote: Garren_Windspear


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 11:55 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Aug 05, 2014
Posts: 6083
Location: Here. Always.
Numbers gave a solid foundation for a mass claim. I take it you are not in agreement with that given your stance in your post despite having debated about it with Lilan?

_________________
Spoiler


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2015 12:29 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 1468
Location: America's Wang
Identity: Numerical
Those were 2 separate points in 2 separate posts. I have no idea why you mashed them together, but when you actually read them separate they make sense.


Negative. What I'm responding to is you saying "This will not be able to be used as information on the roles and everyone does need to be reminded of that before it's used in the wrong way. After all, 2-3 people will probably be lying." It's two separate sentences, but that's as far as the separation goes. You state the information will not be able to be used. Then you connect the notion of people lying by use of "after all". So again, perhaps you'd like to rephrase for clarity.

1) I said you oppose the mass claim because of convention/tradition. You've since gone on to explain that you oppose a mass claim because of that very reason.

2) You said 25-33% of potential liars is a deal breaker for you on a mass claim. I pointed out that with each town death with no mafia lynches, that number only increases and then asked you to justify how greater numbers aren't a deal breaker for you.

My point is not that you have a problem with mass claims at any point, my point is that your arguments do not strictly apply to early game mass claims, often times (such as in the case of liar percentages) becoming an even greater issue later on.

Quote:
I'll take these 2 together, because the tracker/watcher was exactly what I had in mind.

An average mafiate in a small game will not think of the tracker/watcher. Especially the less experienced players will just keep a 'normal' cop in mind. Therefor, there is a chance they slip up when they do not account a tracker.
However, because you did not claim cop, but you claimed cop variant, you already came out and said 'hey, remember that tracker is a thing!', so you removed the chance for the slip-up.
Timing matters.


So you're making an argument that the mafia will lack any sort of experience and bank on the notion that this game can't include what has been the predominant cop role used in this meta? Tell me again how you're not banking on flawed logic to crutch up your point. But let's go down your road. Let's say we make it to LyLo and there hasn't been a mass claim yet. One ensues. Bob claims vanilla. Joe claims tracker having tracked Bob. Bob claims Joe is lying scum trying to swing a mislynch for victory. Aren't you glad you waited until Joe doesn't have time to verify his role before having him claim? No? Me either.
I think you mistake my intentions. I do not intend to catch somebody in a slip up. I intend to apply pressure on the claims and force scum to give us honest information least they be susceptible to being outed for choosing to lie. To that end, please everybody be aware that I could be an alignment cop (under which umbrella I could be Sane, Insane, Paranoid, Naive, Random, a day cop, a macho cop, an Amnesiac), role cop, vanilla cop, tracker, watcher, fountain watch, coroner, flavor cop, gunsmith, or even the dreaded lie detector. That should cover just about everything.

I hope the hydra is at odds all game for the lolz.

_________________
This is a signature.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 578 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 29  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group