This is another one of those threads that I've been wanting to start for a while, and I thought I'd better get it out there while I still have the time and still care about
Magic Dominaria enough to put in the energy.
So, I've been wondering about the story of those paladins from 7th Edition and how they fit into the bigger picture. 7th Edition tried this weird thing where all the cards had new artwork and there were hints at an overarching story that revolved around the conflict between the
Northern Paladin and the
Southern Paladin on one side and the
Western Paladin and
Eastern Paladin on the other. What's interesting and potentially tricky about the whole situation is that the flavourtext in the set started the trend of mentioning Oneah, the nation (and island of the same name) on Dominaria that was described in the Harper Prism novel
Ashes of the Sun [insert obligatory comment about how much I love that book]. This along with the fairly consistent look of the art direction for most of the Soldier cards in the set seems to strongly suggest that the conflict between the paladins took place in or around Oneah, even though the flavourtext on
Merfolk of the Pearl Trident seems to be the only one that directly references both (
“The paladins would be wise not to forget about the Pearl Trident. The merfolk warriors have turned the tide of more than one human war … and I have no doubt they shall do so again.” —Onean scholar). There's also the text on
Staunch Defenders that quotes the Southern Paladin, and the soldiers in the artwork are wearing the same kind of armour and uniform as, say,
Crossbow Infantry, which has flavourtext referencing Oneah (only added in 8th Edition, though), or
Shield Wall (which is actually from 7th Edition).
Leaving the setting aside for a moment, what do we actually know about those paladins? Well, not much. The best piece of info I could find is from an old
Ask Wizards article. If anyone knows other sources or perhaps even has a 7th Edition deck insert that gives us more information, that would be super appreciated. Anyway, here's what the source says:
July 10Q: "What is up with the
Northern Paladin's left eye? It seems that several cards in Seventh Edition picturing the
Northern Paladin, such as
Glorious Anthem,
Final Fortune, and
Reprisal, all show the left eye as simply white. What happened to him? Or is this just a mistake?"
A: From
Brandon Bozzi, creative administrator:
"Actually, all four of the paladins have a missing eye. In the Seventh Edition backstory, when someone is 'confirmed' as a paladin he trades one of his eyes for a magical gemstone which increases his spell casting ability. Take a look at
Infernal Contract,
Grapeshot Catapult, and
Oppression for other examples of the replaced eye."
https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/a ... 2002-07-01You know those cases when unrelated pieces of old lore come together with other unrelated circumstances and everything ends up fitting way better than anyone could have planned for? Well, look no further than the updated creature types of
Western Paladin and
Eastern Paladin, which would be Phyrexian Zombie Knight (formerly just Zombie Knight). Why do I think this does anything for the 7th Edition story? It's because the lore about the paladins' eye implants reminds me of the
Eye of Yawgmoth the Phyrexians put inside of
Belbe, Corrupted Observer. Yeah, it wasn't literally in her
eye, but it was a device that allowed Yawgmoth to directly observe her at all times. Funnily enough, Belbe's (updated) typeline also says Phyrexian Zombie Elf. I thought the Zombie type was super weird on Belbe when the card came out, even considering her origin story, but apparently WotC is also using the type for the kind of not-really-undead Phyrexian creation that Belbe is. This, in turn, would help to explain why the black paladins from 7th Edition look like regular living people (apart from the eye implants) and not like the undead monstrosities they were printed as in
Urza's Saga. They probably started out as normal dudes that were then killed, dissected and put back together again as Phyrexian cyborgs. It helps that
Phyrexian Hulk was also reprinted in 7th Edition and even received new flavourtext, which is an "Onean children’s rhyme" apparently. The possibility of a Phyrexian presence in Oneah was already baked into the story of 7th Edition right from the start!
I stated above that the Oneah connection in the flavourtext of 7th Edition was "potentially tricky", and here is why. Bruce Holland Rogers, the author of 'Heart of Shanodin' in the
Tapestries anthology, must have been as in love with
Ashes of the Sun as I am, because the story references much of the lore from that book in great detail while adding some of its own. We learn that Khairt, the protagonist of 'Heart of Shanodin', survived the fall of Oneah in the Goblin War and used to be a wrestler in the same wrestling school as Ayesh, the protagonist of
Ashes of the Sun. (And let me get this awesome detail out there, even though it's not relevant to the overall thread: Khairt is actually mentioned by name in
Ashes of the Sun as one of the other wrestlers Ayesh used to know at least twice, as far as I can tell. He even uses at least one of the same Onean idioms - "Gods and gashes" - in his speech as Ayesh! Just how cool is that level of detail!? A casual reader would probably never pick that up, but it's there!).
To get to the heart of the issue, Khairt tells his companion this: "That is why I wandered far until I found a master who would teach me the art of broadsword.
Edged weapons were forbidden in Oneah. Sin resides in steel" (
Tapestries, p. 168, emphasis mine). Me being the nerd I am, I went through
Ashes of the Sun cover to cover to see whether this is explicitly contradicted or confirmed there (Well, technically I went through AotS first looking for that reference about edged weapons, only to realise it was in that other story all along. D'oh!). I'm pretty confident in saying that it doesn't clearly come up either way in the novel, so there is no contradiction and the info in
Tapestries fits the exisiting canon. The only part of AotS that comes close to touching on the subject is this little bit about the Onean wrestlers specifically: "For just a moment they [the goblins] froze at the sight of the wrestlers, men and women too pure to fight with weapons [...]" (
Ashes of the Sun, p. 83). This doesn't necessarily tell us much about Oneah as a whole or all kinds of weapons in general, but it certainly fits the bigger picture.
Okay, so if edged/bladed weapons were forbidden in Oneah, that might explain why it was completely destroyed by goblins, but it's also at odds with the knights and soldiers depicted in the art of several 7th Edition cards, at least if we assume those are supposed to be Onean. My suggested solution? Well, Khairt refers to the status quo in Oneah during the time of its fall, at the very end of the civilisation about 40 years before the Phyrexian Invasion. But we know that Oneah was old, presumably older than Benalia (which was founded at least 1,000 years ago) since one of
Torsten Von Ursus's seven lieutnants was in fact from Oneah. (Small caveat: I haven't been able to get my hands on
Sisay's Quest yet, in which the
Weatherlight visits the ruins of Oneah, so I have no idea whether there are any super specific details regarding the matter in that source). Clearly something must have changed between the story of the paladins and the Goblin War that ended Oneah. My theory is that it was the war between the paladins itself that led to bladed weapons being outlawed. In fact, I think the conflict was probably a civil war between the seven cities of Oneah that was caused by Phyrexian agents in human disguise pulling the strings. This would explain the somewhat arbitrary division between south and north VS east and west, especially as there isn't anything on the map that this could refer to other than citites. In fact, the 7th Edition flavourtext on
Wall of Bone mentions "the city of the Eastern Paladin". Even the existence of a paladin tradition that opposes black mana in the north of Oneah would make sense since noth of Oneah beyond the Red Mountains lies the kingdom of Amjad, which is known for its evil king, its blighted bogs and its
Black Knights (which Khairt has joined after the fall of Oneah). The anti-red order in the southern parts of Oneah was probably concerned with fighting off goblins and the like, so even that fits. An Onean civil war and the ensuing ban on edged weapons to prevent this from ever happening again might explain why the ban is justified with "Sin resides in steel" by Khairt, and maybe this development was what gave rise to the Onean wrestling tradition in the first place. Heck, this would actully mirror the history of the Garan elves from
The Prodigal Sorcerer, which is kinda cool IMO.
It's not quite clear from the cards whether there were several paladins of each type or only one. The art and flavourtext make it look like it's only one of each, but the cards themselves aren't legendary. Maybe there was an entire order or faction of paladins for each cardinal direction, each of them with a single leader who was referred to as THE Southern/Northern/Western/Eastern Paladin. As I outlined with the Southern and Northern Paladin(s), though, I think they each must have had a specific kind of enemy to defend Oneah from (goblins and the kingdom of Amjad), so it makes sense for them to be entire factions and not just a single individual each. The black orders in the east and west could have been founded specifically to stir up a civil war.
TL;DR and ConclusionSo, to sum it all up again, my theory for the possible reconstruction of the story is something like this:
- At some point in Oneah's history, at least two orders of white-aligned paladins with magical eye-implants existed
- The Phyrexians infiltrated Oneah by turning at least two of its paladins into brainwashed cyborgs with their own version of the eye-implants that probably functioned like Belbe's
Eye of Yawgmoth- A civil war broke out between the Onean cities controlled by or allied with the black paladins against their white counterparts
- The civil war ended, edged weapons were forbidden in Oneah to prevent another civil war from happening again
- The Phyrexians may or may not have continued to pull the strings behind the scenes, perhaps intentionally banning edged weapons and disbanding the paladins to make Oneah more vulnerable to external threats
- About 40 years before the Phyrexian Invasion, Oneah is destroyed by hordes of goblins from the surrounding Red Mountains