It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:39 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 823 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:13 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 16394
Location: Secret Lair
I'm having trouble deciding between bridge tongs rack and through the breach emrakul.

Which do you guys think is better in this meta?

Edit: Another option was double meddling mage or double mesmeric fiend or a mix of those things.


Last edited by mjack33 on Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:16 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 2979
All your named cards are illegal in this round?


All cards must have CMC of 4.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:25 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 16394
Location: Secret Lair
Oh. Then Jim has been doing a really really really bad job monitoring pm'd decks for legality.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 10:32 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 09, 2013
Posts: 7454
Location: Mountain View
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him
I just hadn't gotten around to finalizing my decklist until late last night. If your PM is still in your outbox, I haven't read it.

_________________
if someone said this about me i'd make it my signature


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 10:19 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jul 26, 2015
Posts: 276
Identity: Male
Okay, so for 3CM Season 11 I have to submit two alternative rounds, but because I'm new to this I have absolutely no idea what kind of things would be cool, so I've come up with a few and am keen for some feedback on which ones look like fun to play. Obviously, none of them at all could get picked, so it might not matter anyway.
Alternate round ideas

I'm out for the moment. Any look promising?


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 10:28 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '11
YMtC Pro Tour Champion
YMtC Idol Winner
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 10665
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/my/mine/himself
Football can't possibly be balanced. edit: Yeah Llanowar Elite is kind of crazy.
Pirates is cool.
Can't Touch This doesn't seem very interesting.
idk what to think about CS.
Not sure how much half-life changes things. Second Rite for the win I guess.
1CM is probably a terrible idea.

_________________
[Warchief] Custom EDH Project
you're like the kind of person who would cast Necropotence irl


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 6:20 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 16394
Location: Secret Lair
1 CM would have to have a stupidly long special ban-list. There are too many things like Karn Liberated that are just stupid if you cast them turn 1.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 6:35 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Posts: 4649
Location: Alchemist's Refuge
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
Not to mention how pointless any form of removal would become since you can cast cards from anywhere. Grave Titan owns the format.

Maybe add an additional life cost for each time the card is cast from somewhere other than the hand?

Football should probably have a stipulation for when the kicker cost is free. Like only if the kicker cost is less than or equal to the mana cost of the card. That way you don't get a 6/6 trampler for 1, but you can still get value out of cards like Gigantiform or Benalish Emissary. And the thing about only kicking once for free needs to be extended to cards with multiple kicker costs, not just multikicker.

_________________
Former Rules Advisor (RA program ended 5-3-16)

Up High, Down Low, Whoops, Too Slow.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 6:58 pm 
Offline
YMtC Champ '11
YMtC Pro Tour Champion
YMtC Idol Winner
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 10665
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/my/mine/himself
Yeah. Value out of Gigantiform.
Good luck with that :v

_________________
[Warchief] Custom EDH Project
you're like the kind of person who would cast Necropotence irl


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 7:03 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Posts: 4649
Location: Alchemist's Refuge
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
I don't have every Kicker card in existence memorized, so sue me. P:

_________________
Former Rules Advisor (RA program ended 5-3-16)

Up High, Down Low, Whoops, Too Slow.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 12:33 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
Skullwinder looks like an interesting little card for Lotus rounds. The classic Anurid Scavenger deck is probably generally better, and it's probably no match for dual lotus...but who knows?

At the very least we have a new Leonin Squire for medallion rounds...

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 5:17 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 2979
Oh, that's nice. Sure, it's weak to round boogeymen FoW and Tabernacle (and Revoker)... but Black Lotus - Skullwinder - Liliana of the Veil would actually have 6-0d my deck last round (a feat no submitted deck accomplished). Now, Leonin Squire or Nether Spirit instead of Skullwinder would have done the same, mind... but there's something pleasing about that deathtouch that would allow it to at least trade with anything nonevasive.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:30 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
Hmm, that might just be better than Scavenger just because it's a turn faster on the kill removal or can discard on turn 1. I was looking at True-Name Nemesis but Lily does a nice job.

I found another fun deck I want to use soon:

Gigantoplasm
Dryad Arbor
Sand Silos

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 3:40 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... edit#gid=1

Ok, I went back and checked Season 2 Round 17 and Chaos Lord is giving me a headache. Can someone explain how Deck 8 loses to Deck 10? As far as I can tell, if 8 plays Chaos Lord, 10 plays its land and Lord bounces control every upkeep and no one can attack with it until another permanent is played. But since deck 10 can only play their cards during their main phase, wouldnt that mean if they play anything to make the number of permanents odd, and therefore keep Lord under a player's control, Lord would remain under deck 8's control and deck 8 would be able to attack for the win?

Seems to me the only way for the opponent to permanently control your Chaos Lord is to be able to play a permanent on your turn after Chaos Lord has switch controllers...

Edit: Nvm, I think I figured it out. Broodstar's flying means Lord can't block it, so Lord flickers back and forth while Star flies to the win.

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Last edited by POSValkir on Fri Mar 11, 2016 3:55 am, edited 1 time in total.

Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 3:53 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15598
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
POSValkir wrote:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1r1VbPbSYD7T-ZrmpRiHsXaY3qFUPTQBcsZC4LRUyNoM/edit#gid=1

Ok, I went back and checked Season 2 Round 17 and Chaos Lord is giving me a headache. Can someone explain how Deck 8 loses to Deck 10? As far as I can tell, Chaos Lord bounces control every upkeep and no one can attack with it until another permanent is played. But since deck 10 can only play their cards during their main phase, wouldnt that mean if they play anything to make the number of permanents odd, and therefore keep Lord under a player's control, Lord would remain under deck 8's control and deck 8 would be able to attack for the win?

Seems to me the only way for the opponent to permanently control your Chaos Lord is to be able to play a permanent on your turn after Chaos Lord has switch controllers...

"Chaos Lord can attack as though it had haste unless it entered the battlefield this turn."

:duel:

PS: wait no it triggers on your upkeep. yeah I don't know. why does it even have that clause then?

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 3:56 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
Yeah, but as far as I can tell, Lord can never make it to the main phase. On your upkeep it transfer's to your opponents control. If the opponent didn't play anything on your turn, then the number of permanents is clearly still even. During their upkeep it flickers back.

But I edited in how I think the deck lost. Star has flying so lord can't block it.

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 4:01 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
razorborne wrote:
:duel:

PS: wait no it triggers on your upkeep. yeah I don't know. why does it even have that clause then?

Ha, we're in an edit war. The clause makes a little sense outside of 3CM. You can bust out a Wurm on your opponent's turn and get an attack in.

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 4:06 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15598
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
POSValkir wrote:
razorborne wrote:
:duel:

PS: wait no it triggers on your upkeep. yeah I don't know. why does it even have that clause then?

Ha, we're in an edit war. The clause makes a little sense outside of 3CM. You can bust out a Wurm on your opponent's turn and get an attack in.

yeah, but it's from Ice Age. flash wasn't a big thing then.

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 4:09 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
Kjeldoran Outpost?, Nvm, came after...maybe that's why they made it :P

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2016 9:53 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
Ugh, this round is so unintuitive. Trying to figure out how good my deck is and looking at the Desecration Elemental lines I keep thinking "Isnt that 3-3?" but then I remember you play to win, so Elemental can't come down until the opponent plays out, but if the opponent plays out first, Elemental wins...so no one does anything.

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 823 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group