It is currently Sun Dec 01, 2024 7:15 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 823 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 42  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Wed Mar 11, 2015 7:33 pm 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15599
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
Mown wrote:
Actually, you're right, I'm not even sure if you can do it. I just thought it'd be okay since the discarding is the cost.

no, you're right:

702.36d Any time you have priority, you may turn a face-down permanent you control face up. This is a special action; it doesn’t use the stack (see rule 115). To do this, show all players what the permanent’s morph cost would be if it were face up, pay that cost, then turn the permanent face up.[...]


you pay the cost before you turn it up.

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 1:53 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
Assault Formation could have some potential. There were some others, but I don't have time to look them up before work. I don't think there will ever be a format in which that new red Mythic and Braid of Fire work out but maybe?

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Last edited by POSValkir on Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:24 am, edited 1 time in total.

Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:03 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15599
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
I can't imagine Assault Formation doing anything.

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:06 am 
Offline
YMtC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Oct 17, 2013
Posts: 3486
Preferred Pronoun Set: He
Lotus-Figure of Destiny-Braid of fire

Oh wait no that is terrible.

_________________
The cake is a differential manifold with group structure.
Knife Life


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:13 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15599
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
Dr_Demento wrote:
Lotus-Figure of Destiny-Braid of fire

Oh wait no that is terrible.

many things are terrible

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:21 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
Yeah, I haven't found a Braid deck that isn't just better with storage lands.

As for formation...
Nyx-Fleece Ram
Savannah
Assault Formation

is kinda meh, but maybe you can just ignore Ass Forms second ability and concentrate on the first. Is there a high toughness 2 CMC non-defender creature with a relevant ability that's been overlooked before?

Isn't there a dasher too?

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:30 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15599
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
POSValkir wrote:
Yeah, I haven't found a Braid deck that isn't just better with storage lands.

As for formation...
Nyx-Fleece Ram
Savannah
Assault Formation

is kinda meh, but maybe you can just ignore Ass Forms second ability and concentrate on the first. Is there a high toughness 2 CMC non-defender creature with a relevant ability that's been overlooked before?
savannah only makes 1 mana.

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:35 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
Is Ram or Ass Form 2 CMC? Links don't work on my work computer anymore. I thought Form was and Ram was

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:43 am 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15599
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
POSValkir wrote:
Is Ram or Ass Form 2 CMC? Links don't work on my work computer anymore. I thought Form was and Ram was

they both cost 2.

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 2:46 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
Ouch, that changes things then. Probably doesn't have potential. Feels like it's sitting right next to Thrummer in my "needs a 4th card" pile.

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 3:05 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
The notion of broken in 3CM is a bit dubious considering its nature. This isn't like Flash Hulk legacy or Trix Extended or Affinity Standard. Even the stuff that has been banned for years have stable formats existing around them. It's just a point of how much exclusion is too much. Lotus is both inclusive and exclusive. There are a number of decks that just aren't good without Lotus, both mainstays and fringe. True, there are a number of decks that are no good because of Lotus, but that's gonna be true for any format with any top card. Without Lotus, you're left with 1-mana.dec, City and Workshop decks, and charge-land decks. Funny thing is, those are all viable decks RIGHT NOW. BridgeTongs is consistently viable, AfflictionThreat catches people off-guard all the time, Tabernacle Karn wrecks unsuspecting formats, and so on. Taking away Lotus doesn't actually open up much except for threat decks designed to work off of two-mana sources, and those get wrecked by the control decks already in the format.

Point is, Lotus isn't a problem in the same way that Blackmail is a problem.

I don't wanna clog up the main board, but this post intrigues me.

What decks aren't viable because Lotus is around? There's a few that get stronger, but those aren't really off the board right now anyways. Elephant Discard still wins on the play vs. Double Lotus and 4/1's Lotus Wasteland Mayor (there are even some versions it can 3-3 or better against). I ask cause I really can't think of any. Other than that I fully agree with your post.

And, to me, I think all banning Lotus does is make a turn 1 play into a turn 3/4 play (and I think LED is an easy Lotus substitute that gets those same threats out on turn 1). The threats from Double lotus still come down in time to win against pretty much all the same decks it's just far more vulnerable to Discard.

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 4:25 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
lol, how you feel about the new Frost Titan Rush?

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 6:01 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 09, 2013
Posts: 7454
Location: Mountain View
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him
Threats with ETB removal tend to lead to 2-2 waiting games. If the opponent never plays their threat, you can't win without playing out Icefall Regent onto an empty board. And then the removal aspect is wasted.

_________________
if someone said this about me i'd make it my signature


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 6:14 pm 
Offline
YMtC Champ '14
YMTC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Jun 04, 2014
Posts: 15599
Location: Freedom
Preferred Pronoun Set: they
POSValkir wrote:
lol, how you feel about the new Frost Titan Rush?

way worse in 3cm, it doesn't work if you play it first.

:duel:

_________________
I tend to agree with Razor.

Mown wrote:
I'll never again complain about raz's criteria.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Thu Mar 12, 2015 7:26 pm 
Offline
YMtC Champ '12
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 5218
Location: California
POSValkir wrote:
What decks aren't viable because Lotus is around? There's a few that get stronger, but those aren't really off the board right now anyways. Elephant Discard still wins on the play vs. Double Lotus and 4/1's Lotus Wasteland Mayor (there are even some versions it can 3-3 or better against). I ask cause I really can't think of any. Other than that I fully agree with your post.

Most charge land decks aren't viable because of Lotus. The only ones that tend to have a shot run Maze of Ith or The Tabernacle at Pendrell Vale, and it's a shot in the dark as to which is best on any given week. This is because Lotus speeds up the aggro decks in the format. Without it, you'd still have Mayor of Avabruck and double Chronomaton and such aggro decks, but those tend to be less dominating. Without Lotus, the number of fast things that can happen goes way down. Charge land decks don't have to worry about first turn Ajani Vengeant, first turn Titans, and so on. Lotus goes hand in hand with Wasteland, though. If you ban one, you should really ban the other.

That said, I think both formats are fine. Lotus is more dynamic.

I think we should try that progressive tournament again, where nothing is banned to begin with, then cards get banned every week if they were in the top X decks. That was interesting.

_________________
Dies to Removal | Karados


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 2:44 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
@New Frost Titan: I'll need to re-read it. I thought it was Etb and on attack, unless its the second ability and I just ran over here laughing since we just banned Titan.

@Rush: I always saw Charge lannds as not viable because of wasteland. Lotus keeps their speed in check, sure, but you already identified some ways around that, and there are other options, like Energy Field and to a lesser degree things like Meekstone have mild potential for success depending on the meta...or some hilarious deck I cant think of off the top of my head.

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 3:19 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 16394
Location: Secret Lair
Valkir, you've said it yourself. Most decks you come up wtih are just 1 or 2 turns away from viability.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 4:35 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
I guess my real argument comes down to the way things are banned. If you want Lotus banned, then why keep LED available and good lord does Wasteland explode in power level. At the same time, with the new seasonal format...you only have to go 2 rounds dealing with a warped meta, and that's pretty fun. In general I'm not entirely certain anything NEEDS banned. Even something so powerful it made the opponent discard their whole hand can be stopped with 2 X Loxodon Smiter type card, Storage Land or 2 X Storage Land, Smiter if you think Wasteland is in the deck and don't want to tie.

That's what I really enjoy about this game, it's not a simple Rock-Paper-Scissors between decks. Each card you play is a round of Rock-Paper-Scissors.

I thought I played a "Scissors" deck this round with Legion, that Mayor was the "Rock" deck, and Channex was "Paper". That line of thinking is entirely wrong.

Legion was Rock, Needle was Scissors.
Channex was Paper, Wasteland was Rock, Threat was Scissors.
Mayor was Rock, Wasteland was Rock
Mayor was Rock, Gut Shot was Scissors

When I played Scissors, Rock came down for the win.

I think I'll use that line of thinking in future meta analysis.

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 7:11 am 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 30, 2013
Posts: 16394
Location: Secret Lair
I'm confused. How did I do so well with all those rocks if I'm scissors?


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 3cm meta discussion
PostPosted: Fri Mar 13, 2015 7:26 am 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Jan 08, 2014
Posts: 4662
Location: Depends on the Day
I mean, it's not a PERFECT analogy. Gut shot's primary purpose was to cut Channex. It just also happened to soften or beat some of the Rocks out there.

_________________
"I love you like Kanye love Kanye" - Dan Rawdon


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 823 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 ... 42  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group