It is currently Sat Nov 30, 2024 11:59 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 2:38 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Apr 01, 2016
Posts: 870
Electrolyze is a fairly good card, but what if it costed:
? Would it still be playable?
? Would it be broken?
? Would it be used in mono blue?
? Would it be used in every deck?

Just wondering.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 2:41 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 7801
In order:
-Not really.
-Yes.
-Of course it would it if it weren't banned. Also it would be a major break of the color pie as that is not what Hybrid is for.
-No because it would certainly be banned across all formats and casual players would hate it too.

_________________
magicpablo666 wrote:
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 2:49 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 3084
In Order:
#1 - Would still be used in every blue/red deck in Limited, but wouldn't see a lot of Constructed use.
#2 - Maybe not in Legacy, but certainly everywhere else.
#3 - Yes, of course it would. 1 mana for 2 damage and a card? Huge upgrade over Shock, even an upgrade (can target multiple targets) over the cycling effect of Deem Worthy for (insanely) lower cost.
#4 - Yes. Every deck. Maximum amount. Why wouldn't you?

_________________
Quote:
"If you refuse to use rock, you will never beat scissors." — Galef, Dakka Dakka Forums


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 2:55 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Apr 01, 2016
Posts: 870
Yarium wrote:
In Order:
#1 - Would still be used in every blue/red deck in Limited, but wouldn't see a lot of Constructed use.
#2 - Maybe not in Legacy, but certainly everywhere else.
#3 - Yes, of course it would. 1 mana for 2 damage and a card? Huge upgrade over Shock, even an upgrade (can target multiple targets) over the cycling effect of Deem Worthy for (insanely) lower cost.
#4 - Yes. Every deck. Maximum amount. Why wouldn't you?


#4, Deck thinning is nice, but if you've got your deck pretty well set out to deal with everything you might not?


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 2:59 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 25, 2013
Posts: 3084
gd1w wrote:
#4, Deck thinning is nice, but if you've got your deck pretty well set out to deal with everything you might not?

That doesn't really follow. It'd be like asking you "Would you like to play with a 56 card deck?" and you saying "No thanks. My deck's pretty well set out to deal with everything.". You should be saying "heck ya!" and tossing out a few cards to better improve your odds of drawing the right cards.

_________________
Quote:
"If you refuse to use rock, you will never beat scissors." — Galef, Dakka Dakka Forums


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:02 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 7801
Also those four "free" cards are Shock+ and "draw a card" as the same time. There is no reason at all to ever not run four in any deck ever.

_________________
magicpablo666 wrote:
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:05 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Apr 01, 2016
Posts: 870
AzureShade wrote:
Also those four "free" cards are Shock+ and "draw a card" as the same time. There is no reason at all to ever not run four in any deck ever.


But what if you accidentally draw your last card? Just kidding.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 24, 2017 3:11 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 7801
gd1w wrote:
AzureShade wrote:
Also those four "free" cards are Shock+ and "draw a card" as the same time. There is no reason at all to ever not run four in any deck ever.


But what if you accidentally draw your last card? Just kidding.
Then you win?

_________________
magicpablo666 wrote:
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 1:43 pm 
Offline
YMtC Pro Tour Champion
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 14370
at :0: you would run 4 in every deck even if that took you to 64 cards because it replaces itself and has a positive effect. Street Wraith wasn't the universal include people thought it would be, because the deck thinning isn't worth the life most of the time (My sole disagreement with Yarium: a 56-card deck isn't *that* good on its own). When you are doing something for nothing at no opportunity cost? You have no excuse. Gitaxian Probe is already heavily played as a 0-mana cantrip (unlike Wraith it can do its cantrip thing on a random spare :u: instead of life, and it has a positive effect)

_________________
"Enjoy your screams, Sarpadia - they will soon be muffled beneath snow and ice."

I have a blog. I review anime, and sometimes related media, with an analytical focus.

I'm a (self) published author now! You can find my books on Amazon in Paperback or ebook!
The Accursed, a standalone young adult fantasy adventure.
Witch Hunters, book one of a young adult Scifi-fantasy trilogy.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 8:01 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 2979
Probe isn't heavily played anymore (in Modern, where it was a staple for years). Banning will do that.

A lot of speculation Wraith may join it next week. Now the 4th most frequently played creature in Modern.

And let's not get into the absurd prices Mishra's Bauble have reached.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 9:27 pm 
Offline
Member

Joined: Oct 07, 2015
Posts: 312
There is a slight cost to zero-mana card draw: loss of information. Getting them in your starting hand makes your mulligan decisions harder, since you don't know what cards will replace them. You can also have that uncertainty during the game if you don't immediately cast them as you draw them.

(The benefits can still easily outweigh this cost, especially for this hypothetical where you get a significant effect added on. I'm just saying the cost isn't completely nonexistent.)


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 25, 2017 10:37 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 22, 2013
Posts: 7801
That uncertainty is completely negated by the card also being a free good burn spell.

_________________
magicpablo666 wrote:
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders - The most famous of which is "never get involved in an thread with GM_Champion" - but only slightly less well-known is this: "Never go in against AzureShade when card design is on the line!"


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 1:31 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: May 09, 2014
Posts: 4575
i like the idea of a zero mana cantrip because it causes one to question what strength is

to simplify the case even further:

Ghostly Cantrip -
Instant
At the beginning of the game before you draw any cards, if ~ is in your deck you may reveal it and exile it.
Do Nothing

So this effectively just lets you run an actual 56 card deck, and every deck in magic benefits from using it, but none are improved that much for it. The card is run in every single deck, but might result in an increase of winrate that is significantly less than a card that is only run in some decks (even within a certain archetype).

_________________
"That winter, the fireplace was never without a crackling blaze in its belly. The boiled wine we drank was undoubtedly middling and cheap, but she said, with a smile, "I've never had wine this good before." And though I didn't say anything, I felt the same way."


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 26, 2017 6:25 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sep 23, 2013
Posts: 14004
Identity: Chaoslight
Preferred Pronoun Set: She
Why make the card if every deck would run it other than to drive sales in a horrible way? Making 56 the deck limit is far easier on production.

_________________
altimis wrote:
I never take anytihng Lily says seriously, except for when I take it personally. Then it's personal.
WotC_Ethan wrote:
People, buy more stuff.
#WotCstaff
Spoiler

Image


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 27, 2017 1:53 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: May 09, 2014
Posts: 4575
the point is to question the meaning of card strength and not to justify bad cards

_________________
"That winter, the fireplace was never without a crackling blaze in its belly. The boiled wine we drank was undoubtedly middling and cheap, but she said, with a smile, "I've never had wine this good before." And though I didn't say anything, I felt the same way."


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:07 pm 
Offline
Member
User avatar

Joined: Oct 04, 2015
Posts: 4649
Location: Alchemist's Refuge
Identity: Male
Preferred Pronoun Set: he/him/his/his/himself
Storm Crow is a meme.

_________________
Former Rules Advisor (RA program ended 5-3-16)

Up High, Down Low, Whoops, Too Slow.


Like this post
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group